Minnesota, Missouri Considering Gun Confiscation Bills

Exchange Gun Auction

In Missouri, Democrats have introduced a bill requiring anyone owning an “assault weapon” or high-capacity magazine to “Remove the assault weapon or large capacity magazine from the state of Missouri” or “Surrender the assault weapon or large capacity magazine to the appropriate law enforcement agency for destruction.”

Minnesota is considering a similar bill:

10.20 Sec. 7. PERSONS POSSESSING ASSAULT WEAPONS ON EFFECTIVE DATE ACT; REQUIRED ACTIONS.

Any person who, on February 1, 2013, legally owns or is in possession of an assault weapon has until September 1, 2013, to do any of the following without being subject to prosecution under Minnesota Statutes, section 624.7133:

(1) remove the weapon from the state;

(2) surrender the weapon to a law enforcement agency for destruction;

(3) render the weapon permanently inoperable; or

(4) if eligible, register the weapon as provided in Minnesota Statutes, section 624.7133, subdivision 5.

EFFECTIVE DATE.This section is effective the day following final enactment.

It’s hard to imagine the courts upholding these laws in light of the Supreme Court’s ruling in DC vs. Heller, McDonald vs. Chicago and US vs. Miller.

Heller upheld the 2nd amendment as an individual, not collective, right. McDonald applied the interpretation of the 2nd amendment as an individual right to states. Miller held that the 2nd amendment upholds the right to keep and bear arms “in common use.”

Unless the folks in Missouri and Minnesota can argue that so-called “assault weapons” aren’t in common use, these laws aren’t going to pass constitutional muster. Because “assault weapons” such as the AR-15 platform, one of the most popular weapons of all time, are very much “in common use.”

In related news, in Minnesota in 2011 more citizens were killed by knives and fists than rifles.

Rob Port is the editor of SayAnythingBlog.com. In 2011 he was a finalist for the Watch Dog of the Year from the Sam Adams Alliance and winner of the Americans For Prosperity Award for Online Excellence. In 2013 the Washington Post named SAB one of the nation's top state-based political blogs, and named Rob one of the state's best political reporters. He writes a weekly column for several North Dakota newspapers, and also serves as a policy fellow for the North Dakota Policy Council.

Related posts

  • schreib

    Buck Minnesota and Missouri dems. They are ill informed of our constitution and our heritage. In short they are useful idiots.

  • S33 Y0^

    This is just utterly ridiculous with all these intolerable acts of the government placing on
    the people.

    • slackwarerobert

      Don’t forget homeland security says they are releasing the criminals from jail this week. And they still claim there is no need to have a rifle that will stop hordes of criminals roaming the streets.

  • Roy_Bean

    Wouldn’t this amount to Minnesota and Missouri seceeding from the rest of the US?

    • slackwarerobert

      If that is all it takes, I will press my state reps to pass similar bill. I won’t obey it, but if it gets me away from the feds it will be worth having it on the books.

  • WOOF

    Obviously there are too few firearms.
    “in Minnesota in 2011 more citizens were killed by knives and fists than rifles.”
    Americans prefer handguns when available , six shooters or 14 shooters.
    Half of murders are accomplished by handguns.
    “. Of the 12,664 murders in 2011 reported to the FBI’s Uniform Crime Report, 6,220 were committed with handguns’

  • borborygmi

    Two laws going absolutely nowhere

    • John_Wayne_American

      If they had a snowballs chance in hell, the very first confiscated firearm would be taken to Federal Court faster than you can say “2nd amendment, shall not be infringed”

      • John_Wayne_American

        I do hope they at least bring it to a vote, one way to get rid of a whole shitload of worthless gun grabbing Dem legislators. I can see the those ads now..

  • slackwarerobert

    The heck with Heller, what about taking property without just compensation clause. They will have to PAY for the guns they take. But I don’t see the cops turning in there REAL assault weapons.
    Guess it is time for a waterproof box so they can hang out in the waterways outside the states jurisdiction.

  • RCND

    We’ll just open up shops on the border next to the fireworks stands. Their loss is our gain

    • John_Wayne_American

      We cant do that, ‘cuz they will through in the Chicago logic, that state that their gun control laws work just fine , its the evil neighbor states that the gang bangers smuggle guns in from”

      So by that logic … adjoining states will also have to turn in their guns..

      I would set up a guns for smoke shop, MN wants to raise taxes on cig’s buy a 1.80 per pack. trade your AR for 52, cartons part of the “carton per week” special for MN residents only.

  • slackwarerobert

    So has the democratic party apologized to the republican party yet? The NY courts have ruled that the rape is only legitimate if you penetrate her vagina.

  • JoeMN

    What a great opportunity to showcase real (unfiltered by the media) liberalism to the gun owning Minnesotan.

  • Opinion8ed

    Do the citizens of these states know this

  • Greg

    What is MN’s assault rifle definition???

    • slackwarerobert

      Probably on the lines of, gee it looks real evil. The courts will really have to twist themselves in knots over this one, yep plastic stock is banned, wooden ones a-ok when it is the same gun. Worst case you remove the stock and posses a legal ar or ak pistol. Go to your local jeweler and have pistol engraved on the lower, and add a “-P” on the end of the serial number if you are really paranoid.

  • yy4u2

    After both those states can show there isn’t any welfare fraud, I’d be happy to discuss this. Until then, go pound sand.

  • $8194357

    New World Order just over the horizon?

    Wait until Barry writes the EO cutting our nuclear arms in half..
    A one world new world order is just a day or two away afterwards perhaps.

    WOW!!! Poking a stick in the tigers eye!!!
    Doesn’t look like they have much respect for the Obama Administration. Shades of the Carter Administration. Problem is that I don’t see another Ronald Reagan in the wings waiting to reverse the trend. Sad!!!

    Bear Bombers Over Guam

    Posted By Bill Gertz On February 15, 2013 (4:04 pm) In National Security

    Two Russian nuclear-armed bombers circled the western Pacific island of Guam this week in the latest sign of Moscow’s growing strategic assertiveness toward the United States.
    The Russian Tu-95 Bear-H strategic bombers were equipped with nuclear-tipped cruise missiles and were followed by U.S. jets as they circumnavigated Guam on Feb. 12 local time—hours before President Barack Obama’s state of the union address.
    Air Force Capt. Kim Bender, a spokeswoman for the Pacific Air Force in Hawaii, confirmed the incident to the Washington Free Beacon and said Air Force F-15 jets based on Andersen Air Force Base, Guam, “scrambled and responded to the aircraft.”
    “The Tu-95s were intercepted and left the area in a northbound direction. No further actions occurred,” she said. Bender said no other details would be released “for operational security reasons.”
    The bomber incident was considered highly unusual. Russian strategic bombers are not known to have conducted such operations in the past into the south Pacific from bomber bases in the Russian Far E ast, which is thousands of miles away and over water.
    John Bolton, former U.N. ambassador and former State Department international security undersecretary, said the Russian bomber flights appear to be part of an increasingly threatening strategic posture in response to Obama administration anti-nuclear policies.
    “Every day brings new evidence that Obama’s ideological obsession with dismantling our nuclear deterrent is dangerous,” Bolton said. “Our national security is in danger of slipping off the national agenda even as the threats grow.”
    Defense officials said the bombers tracked over Guam were likely equipped with six Kh-55 or Kh-55SM cruise missiles that can hit targets up to 1,800 miles away with either a high-explosive warhead or a 200-kiloton nuclear warhead.
    The F-15s that intercepted the bombers were based at Kadena Air Base, Japan, and were deployed to Guam for the ongoing annual Exercise Guahan Shield 2013.
    Two U.S. B-2 strategic bombers were deployed to Guam in late January and last fall advanced F-22 fighter bombers were temporarily stationed on the island. Three nuclear-powered attack submarines and the Global Hawk long-range drone also are based in Guam.
    About 200 Marines currently are training on the island. Earlier news reports stated that Japanese and Australian military jets joined U.S. jets in the Guam exercises.
    Guam is one of the key strategic U.S. military bases under the Obama administration’s new “pivot” to Asia policy. As a result, it is a target of China and North Korea. Both have missiles capable of hitting the island, located about 1,700 miles east of the Philippines in the Mariana island chain.
    This week’s bomber flights are a sign the Russians are targeting the island as well, one defense official said.
    Guam also plays a key role in the Pentagon’s semi-secret strategy called the Air-Sea Battle Concept designed to counter what the Pentagon calls China’s anti-access and area denial weapons—precision guided missiles, submarines, anti-satellite weapons, and other special warfighting capabilities designed to prevent the U.S. military from defending allies or keeping sea lanes open in the region.
    Defense officials disclosed the incident to the Free Beacon and said the Russian bomber flights appeared to be a strategic message from Moscow timed to the president’s state of the union speech.
    “They were sending a message to Washington during the state of the union speech,” one official said.
    The bomber flights also coincided with growing tensions between China and Japan over the Senkaku islands. A Chinese warship recently increased tensions between Beijing and Tokyo by using targeting radar against a Japanese warship.
    The U.S. military has said it would defend Japan in any military confrontation with China over the Senkakus. The bomber flights appear to signal Russian support for China in the dispute.
    Meanwhile, Obama on Wednesday telephoned Japan’s Prime Minister Shinzo Abe to reiterate U.S. nuclear assurances to its ally following North Korea’s third detonation of an underground nuclear device.
    A White House statement said the president told Abe, who visits Washington next week, that the United States “remains steadfast in its defense commitments to Japan, including the extended deterrence offered by the U.S. nuclear umbrella.”
    “It shows that the Russians, like the Chinese, are not just going to sit idly by and watch the United States ‘pivot’ or ‘rebalance’ its forces toward Asia,” said former State Department security official Mark Groombridge.
    “One could argue the Russians were poking a bit of fun at the Obama Administration, see ing how they flew these long-range bombers close to Guam on the same day as the state of the union address,” he said.
    “But the broader implications are more profound,” said Groombridge, now with the private strategic intelligence firm LIGNET. “The Russians are clearly sending a signal that they consider the Pacific an area of vital national strategic interest and that they still have at least some power projection capabilities to counterbalance against any possible increase in U.S. military assets in the region.”
    Airspace violations by Russian Su-27 jets triggered intercepts by Japanese fighters near Japan’s Hokkaido Island last week. The Feb. 7. incident prompted protests from Tokyo and took place near disputed territory claimed by both countries since the end of World War II.
    The Russian air incursion around Guam was the third threatening strategic bomber incident since June. On July 4th, two Bear H’s operated at the closest point to the United States that a Russian bomber has flown since the Soviet Union routinely conducted such flights.
    The July bomber flights near California followed an earlier incident in June when two Bear H’s ran up against the air defense zone near Alaska as part of large-scale strategic exercises that Moscow said involved simulated attacks on U.S. missile defense bases. The Pentagon operates missile defense bases in Alaska and California.
    Those flights triggered the scrambling of U.S. and Canadian interceptor jets as well.
    The bomber flights near Alaska violated a provision of the 2010 New START arms treaty that requires advance notification of exercises involving strategic nuclear bombers.
    Military spokesmen sought to play down the June and July incidents as non-threatening, apparently reflecting the Obama administration’s conciliatory “reset” policy toward Russia that seeks better relations by tamping down criticism of Moscow, despite growing anti-U.S. sentiments and policies from the regime of Russian President Vladimir Putin.
    Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey questioned his Russian counterpart, Gen. Nikolai Makarov, during a meeting at the Pentagon July 12th.
    The latest Russian nuclear saber rattling through bomber flights comes as the Obama administration is planning a new round of strategic arms reduction talks with Russia. State Department arms official Rose Gottemoeller was recently in Moscow for arms discussions.
    The president was expected to announce plans to cut U.S. nuclear forces by an additional one-third in a new round of arms reduction efforts with Moscow.
    However, the president did not announce the plans and said only during his state of the union speech that he plans further arms cuts.
    “Building Guam as a strategic hub has played a critical role in balancing U.S. security interests in responding to and cooperating with China as well as in shapin g China’s perceptions and conduct,” wrote Government Accountability Office analyst Shirley A. Kan in a September 2012 report.
    “Since 2000, the U.S. military has been building up forward-deployed forces on the westernmost U.S. territory of Guam to increase U.S. presence, deterrence, and power projection for potential responses to crises and disasters, counterterrorism, and contingencies in support of South Korea, Japan, the Philippines, Taiwan, or elsewhere in Asia.”
    Article taken from Washington Free Beacon – http://freebeacon.com
    URL to article: http://freebeacon.com/bear-bombers-over-guam/

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jim-Harris/100000730999225 Jim Harris

    This just shows you how delusional the liberals are in these states and in congress…..they think they can do whatever they want with the people of the United States…..lol…..they’re in for a big surprise when they awaken this sleepin giant….those laws are all unconstituitonal !!

Top