Guest Post: Fargo Leaders Aim At Spending More Than Necessary For Flood Protection


It is my understanding that the proposed 2nd street tunnel project in Fargo would provide the same protection that a flood wall would, only at a far greater cost, with the added benefits of green space and beautification. Why are we so eager to spend more than necessary to meet the objective of flood control?

This is an issue because the people of Fargo were motivated in large part by fear to vote in favor of another half-cent sales tax in order to get the flood protection the city promised. Now the people are seeing projects that are unnecessarily expensive. It drives me to assume that we are overtaxed considering, that we could, in fact, have the same protection for far less.

Additionally, we are forcing a long-time Fargo business, the Howard Johnson/Side Street, to either bend to the whim of the city or be bought out, two unattractive options.

I feel that I might know how the city commission may refute my objections. They’d argue the city needs to invest in the downtown area, and that investment has brought downtown Fargo back from the ashes.

My rebuttal is twofold.

One, “investment” by government causes bubbles and those bubbles tend to burst, at any level. Two, I would rather the city tax less, allowing people to keep more of their money and invest where they see fit, instead of central planners driving economic development. Central planning to often leads, as exemplified in this project, to government excess.

The bottom line question is this: The people of Fargo voted twice for flood sales tax because they were told by the commission that we did not have enough money for flood protection. With this project, we are spending $88,000 just to see if it might work. And if plausible, we will spend millions more than is necessary for the same objective of flood protection. If we have extra money lying around for this project, instead of a flood wall that would provide the same level of security, why were we being asked to raise taxes over and again? Why should people stand for that kind of spending?

The answer is we shouldn’t.

Build a flood wall, give the people the protection you promised, and eliminate frivolous expenses that do nothing to enhance flood protection.

Tony Gehrig

Tony Gehrig is a candidate for Fargo City Commissioner.

Related posts

  • camsaure

    Fargo will probably force the (most expensive) diversion on all of us. That said they will still want to steal all the land along the river(greenway). Ever notice how the feds are always finding ways to get control of all the land that they can along any waterway or body of water? The Corps of Engineers is a buch of inept idiots who screw up everthing they touch and cost us all way more in tax dollars. This is another Federal entity that ND needs to wean itself from.

  • fredlave

    This is nuts. I would not vote reelect any “city leaders” or to add to our tax burden. Remember, city-wide special assessments have to go to a vote of the people.

    • Marcus

      Fred, do you recall when Fargo voters went to the polls to approve the $50+ million dollar Davies HS, built in a known flood plain?

      You’re on the right track with not re-electing “city leaders”.

      Fargo residents need to take it a step further and start impeaching reckless city leaders…starting with Walaker and Mahoney.

  • Lynn Bergman

    Plea to Fargo citizens; end the diversion, widen the overbank to accept floodwaters, begin to make some sense.