I’m Not Sure Al Sharpton Knows What “Separation Of Church And State” Means

Generally, when we talk about the issue of church and state, what we’re talking about is religion in the public square. Religious monuments on public land, for instance, or prayer on school grounds.

But the Obama administration’s decision, under the auspices of Obamacare, to force religious organizations to pay for health care treatments/procedures they object to exposes a different facet of that argument. While our government should not be in the habit of endorsing any particular religion over another, neither should our government be able to trample the religious beliefs of our nation’s citizens. Which means that Catholics, running schools and hospitals and universities as an expression of their faith, shouldn’t have to do so while embracing (even tacitly) things they have a moral objection to like abortion or contraception.

That, my friends, is separation of church and state. It cuts both ways. But don’t tell Al Sharpton that. “If we are going to have a separation of church and state, we’re going to have a separation of church and state,” he said on MSNBC’s Morning Joe. “Whether I would personally agree with the decision or not, the question is do I have a right to make that law?”

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Clearly, the government does not have the authority to make laws limiting religious expression. That’s in the 1st amendment. The government can’t force Jehova’s Witnesses to take blood transfusions. They can’t force Christian Scientists to get standard medical treatment instead of relying on faith healing. Jews and Muslims can’t be forced to eat bacon, and Catholics can’t be forced to pay for abortion or contraception services.

This is how freedom works. The notion of religious freedom, and separation of church and state, prohibits the government from shoving any one particular flavor of religion down our throats. It prohibits the government from regulating a certain religious belief out of existence.

Rob Port

Rob Port is the editor of SayAnythingBlog.com. In 2011 he was a finalist for the Watch Dog of the Year from the Sam Adams Alliance and winner of the Americans For Prosperity Award for Online Excellence. In 2013 the Washington Post named SAB one of the nation's top state-based political blogs, and named Rob one of the state's best political reporters.

Related posts