McCain has an 88% rating. Good but not great. Obama has an abysmal 18% rating, and his runningmate actually managed to score a zero.
That’s not change we can believe in.
Greg Jarrett, Fox: You focused on two things really as I understand it, earmarks, and we will get to it in a moment, but wasteful spending talk to us about how the candidates break down on this.
Tom Schatz, CAGW: There is a long track record in both cases, some of which goes to Senator Obama in the Illinois Legislature. We do not analyze the states. But just on the votes in 2007, Senator Obama voted correctly only 10% of the time, and Senator McCain voted 11 out of the 35 times. He did vote correctly every time. His lifetime rating 88% is the sixth-highest in the Senate. Senator Obama’s lifetime rating is 18% in the years that he has been a Senator. So there is a vast difference on the question of spending and taxes and those results are consistent with other analyses and organizations that track all of these various votes.
Jarrett: Is Obama at the bottom?
Schatz: He is not quite at that the bottom. Actually, Senator Biden is at the bottom. He has a zero rating in 2007. But Senator Obama is pretty close at 10%.
Jarrett: So Biden would be the most wasteful in your judgment, and again you are a non-partisan group, would be the most wasteful Senator?
Schatz: He wasn’t the only one. There were 13 Senators with a zero rating, but he was one of those that failed to vote a single time to cut waste or cut taxes are even preserve tax cuts.
Jarrett: And again, we are out of time, but John McCain, zero earmarks. Right?
Schatz: That is it. Zero.
Jarrett: Big goose egg. I mean that is amazing in Congress.
Schatz: It is difficult to say no, but he is one of the few who has.
So much for Obama/Biden being the reform ticket.