The scientific and mathematical details of Viscount Monckton’s paper may be beyond the layman; however this paragraph near the end stands out and is comprehendible to all:
“It is of no little significance that the IPCC’s value for the coefficient in the CO2 forcing equation depends on only one paper in the literature; that its values for the feedbacks that it believes account for two-thirds of humankind’s effect on global temperatures are likewise taken from only one paper; and that its implicit value of the crucial parameter κ depends upon only two papers, one of which had been written by a lead author of the chapter in question, and neither of which provides any theoretical or empirical justification for a value as high as that which the IPCC adopted.” (Emphasis Added)
[...]
Despite all the leftie bullshit about “scientific consensus”, the facts just don’t support the AGW position.