RON PAUL LEADS THE SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC REFORMATION OF AMERICA
...over a cliff!
Proof - 07:02pm on 02/04/2008
RON PAUL LEADS THE SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC REFORMATION OF AMERICA
J,
Why don’t you ask real, real, nicely and see if Neiman will give up his Avatar for you and the other Lili-Paulians. It would certainly be appropriate, although a dubious credit to Sr. Cervantes.
Bat One - 08:02pm on 02/04/2008
He’s posted this drivel at least 5 times. Each time I have shot it down, yet, like a liberal, J keeps reposting it, hoping, I guess, that repetition of this lie will overcome the truth.
Kenny - 09:02pm on 02/04/2008
...yet, like a liberal, J keeps reposting it, hoping, I guess, that repetition of this lie will overcome the truth.
Kenny,
Democrats have been using this tactic, with some success, for decades. The truth, to them, is never an issue.
Bat One - 09:02pm on 02/04/2008
What are “Impenetrable Military Defenses?” I don’t know of any except for perhaps the Maginot Line. Playing strictly defense will make you lose the game. Even George Washington recognized this important fact.
Politically Incorrect - 10:02pm on 02/04/2008
“The phrase was also used in a report prepared during the war by the United States Office of Strategic Services in describing Hitler’s psychological profile:
His primary rules were: never allow the public to cool off; never admit a fault or wrong; never concede that there may be some good in your enemy; never leave room for alternatives; never accept blame; concentrate on one enemy at a time and blame him for everything that goes wrong; people will believe a big lie sooner than a little one; and if you repeat it frequently enough people will sooner or later believe it.
Does anyone recognize these tactics?
Anyone still think that Slick Willy invented the Big Lie?
These techniques have been honed and refined by Statists and tyrants through the ages. A study of history is the study of repetition.
Move_Zig - 10:02pm on 02/04/2008
Kenny,
Democrats have been using this tactic, with some success, for decades. The truth, to them, is never an issue.
I’m aware of this Bat One. The problem is that a large part of the libertarian base (that people often call the far right, a misnomer) follow these tactics too. While, I consider myself a libertarian, the pure unadulterated amount of crap that the libertarians and Paulistas have been spewing about Paul sickens me.
I’m tired of hearing that he has such a stellar pro-life record (it’s mixed at best). I’m tired of hearing how he’s the small government guy, when he’s the only Republican to consistantly vote against entitlement reform. I’m tired of hearing about his pro-military stance when it is nonexistant.
...over a cliff!
J,
Why don’t you ask real, real, nicely and see if Neiman will give up his Avatar for you and the other Lili-Paulians. It would certainly be appropriate, although a dubious credit to Sr. Cervantes.
He’s posted this drivel at least 5 times. Each time I have shot it down, yet, like a liberal, J keeps reposting it, hoping, I guess, that repetition of this lie will overcome the truth.
Kenny,
Democrats have been using this tactic, with some success, for decades. The truth, to them, is never an issue.
What are “Impenetrable Military Defenses?” I don’t know of any except for perhaps the Maginot Line. Playing strictly defense will make you lose the game. Even George Washington recognized this important fact.
“The phrase was also used in a report prepared during the war by the United States Office of Strategic Services in describing Hitler’s psychological profile:
Does anyone recognize these tactics?
Anyone still think that Slick Willy invented the Big Lie?
These techniques have been honed and refined by Statists and tyrants through the ages. A study of history is the study of repetition.
I’m aware of this Bat One. The problem is that a large part of the libertarian base (that people often call the far right, a misnomer) follow these tactics too. While, I consider myself a libertarian, the pure unadulterated amount of crap that the libertarians and Paulistas have been spewing about Paul sickens me.
I’m tired of hearing that he has such a stellar pro-life record (it’s mixed at best). I’m tired of hearing how he’s the small government guy, when he’s the only Republican to consistantly vote against entitlement reform. I’m tired of hearing about his pro-military stance when it is nonexistant.