Looks like the now debunked rumor has caught a few liberal mouth pieces tits in a wringer too.
To the extent several websites, most notably liberal Alaska blogger Shannyn Moore, are now
claiming as “fact” that Governor Palin resigned because she is “under federal investigation” for
embezzlement or other criminal wrongdoing, we will be exploring legal options this week to
address such defamation. This is to provide notice to Ms. Moore, and those who re-publish the
defamation, such as Huffington Post, MSNBC, the New York Times and The Washington Post,
that the Palins will not allow them to propagate defamatory material without answering to this in
a court of law. The Alaska Constitution protects the right of free speech, while simultaneously holding those “responsible for the abuse of that right.” Alaska Constitution Art. I, Sec. 5. http://ltgov.state.ak.us/constitution.php?section=1. These falsehoods abuse the right to free
speech; continuing to publish these falsehoods of criminal activity is reckless, done without any
regard for the truth, and is actionable.
Some opine that Sarah defending herself against the leftie slimers is a violation of free speech, but I think citizens have the right to defend themselves against attack. When Clinton was being investigated, and rightly so, for his many criminal acts, nobody criticized him for constantly attacking the investigators, and no one accused him of threatening free speech for doing so.
robert108 - 08:07am on 07/05/2009
Of course the lefty moonbats will go on and on about her being under investigation.
goon - 08:07am on 07/05/2009
Some opine that Sarah defending herself against the leftie slimers is a violation of free speech
Please link us Big 180, to anywhere anyone wrote that “Sarah defending herself…is a violation of free speech”
realitybasedbob - 08:07am on 07/05/2009
Being ignorant is no excuse, little parrot. It’s not my job to educate you.
robert108 - 09:07am on 07/05/2009
So nothing then?
Not one fact you can link us to?
Nothing?
realitybasedbob - 09:07am on 07/05/2009
Here’s something from one of your little idiot buttboys:
Again, your ignorance humiliates you. The full article upon which this thread is based also contains that opinion.
Are you stupid, or just lazy?
robert108 - 09:07am on 07/05/2009
Not one fact you can link us to?
“Opine” means to state an opinion, little parrot. Opinions are not facts. Get it?
SMACK!
robert108 - 09:07am on 07/05/2009
Big 180, that is a story about Sarah “I Quit” Palin looking into whether or not she can legally take away someone else’s right of free speech.
You wrote:
Some opine that Sarah defending herself against the leftie slimers is a violation of free speech,
As much as I do appreciate your attempt to change the subject, I will ask you again, do you have anything to back your claim?
realitybasedbob - 09:07am on 07/05/2009
If you could link us to someone somewhere “opining” “that Sarah defending herself against the leftie slimers is a violation of free speech”, that would be a FACT.
If you can’t then by your own definition you are a liar.
A statement is a lie if it’s not true… If you make a statement without knowing it’s true, and it isn’t true, you have lied.
Looks like the now debunked rumor has caught a few liberal mouth pieces tits in a wringer too.
To the extent several websites, most notably liberal Alaska blogger Shannyn Moore, are now
claiming as “fact” that Governor Palin resigned because she is “under federal investigation” for
embezzlement or other criminal wrongdoing, we will be exploring legal options this week to
address such defamation. This is to provide notice to Ms. Moore, and those who re-publish the
defamation, such as Huffington Post, MSNBC, the New York Times and The Washington Post,
that the Palins will not allow them to propagate defamatory material without answering to this in
a court of law. The Alaska Constitution protects the right of free speech, while simultaneously holding those “responsible for the abuse of that right.” Alaska Constitution Art. I, Sec. 5.
http://ltgov.state.ak.us/constitution.php?section=1. These falsehoods abuse the right to free
speech; continuing to publish these falsehoods of criminal activity is reckless, done without any
regard for the truth, and is actionable.
7/4/09 release
Some opine that Sarah defending herself against the leftie slimers is a violation of free speech, but I think citizens have the right to defend themselves against attack. When Clinton was being investigated, and rightly so, for his many criminal acts, nobody criticized him for constantly attacking the investigators, and no one accused him of threatening free speech for doing so.
Of course the lefty moonbats will go on and on about her being under investigation.
Please link us Big 180, to anywhere anyone wrote that “Sarah defending herself…is a violation of free speech”
Being ignorant is no excuse, little parrot. It’s not my job to educate you.
So nothing then?
Not one fact you can link us to?
Nothing?
Here’s something from one of your little idiot buttboys:
http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/palin_position_paper_1_abolish_the_free_press_and_censor_internet_speech/
SMACK!
Again, your ignorance humiliates you. The full article upon which this thread is based also contains that opinion.
Are you stupid, or just lazy?
“Opine” means to state an opinion, little parrot. Opinions are not facts. Get it?
SMACK!
Big 180, that is a story about Sarah “I Quit” Palin looking into whether or not she can legally take away someone else’s right of free speech.
You wrote:
As much as I do appreciate your attempt to change the subject, I will ask you again, do you have anything to back your claim?
If you could link us to someone somewhere “opining” “that Sarah defending herself against the leftie slimers is a violation of free speech”, that would be a FACT.
If you can’t then by your own definition you are a liar.