<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

    <channel>
    
    <title>Say Anything: Reader Blogs</title>
    <link>http://sayanythingblog.com/</link>
    <description></description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>badguy_redux@yahoo.com</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2010</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2010-03-17T05:30:37+00:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.pmachine.com/" />




    
    <item>
      <title>Harold Ford: Democrats are &#8216;scared&#8217;</title>
      <link>http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/harold_ford_democrats_are_scared/</link>
      <author>sanity</author>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject>Politics</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>

<p>Ford also indicated that Republican Sen. Scott Brown’s win in Massachusetts made <b>a Republican win in New York possible. </b></p>

<p>“They’re scared,” he said of the state’s Democratic establishment. <b>“For anyone to believe our normal messaging will win this election … they are kidding themselves.”</b>
</p></blockquote><p> Read the rest of the story <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0310/33752.html">HERE.</a></p>

<p>Ford is talking about the coming NY race with New York Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D). He has this to say about her&#8230;.</p>

<blockquote><p><b>“Voters don’t know the junior senator,” </b>he said, referring to Gillibrand. <b>“They can’t name one positive outcome from her.” </b></p></blockquote>

<p>If Republicans run someone with a record that New Yorkers can get behind, a win in NY is entirely possible, in which Ford also think is a possibility:</p>

<blockquote><p>Former Rep. Harold Ford Jr. said Tuesday that Democrats are “scared” heading into this fall’s election and that he decided not to run for the Senate from New York because he feared his party would lose the seat after a tough primary.</p>

<p><b>“The fall is going to be a tough, tough fall for whatever Democrat emerges,”</b> Ford said</p>

</blockquote><p>
The Primaries are going to be very interesting&#8230;...</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2010-03-02T13:43:13+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>


    
    <item>
      <title>Is Obama a Liar for his Statements on Taxes?</title>
      <link>http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/is_obama_a_liar_for_his_statements_on_taxes/</link>
      <author>sanity</author>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject>Politics</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[You will not see a dime…...of increased taxes Obama says….(read my lips moment?)<br />
<br />
...Not your payroll tax….<br />
......Not your Income tax…..<br />
...........Not your Capital Gains Tax…..<br />
<br />
<center><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/_en-b1IFFxA&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/_en-b1IFFxA&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></center><br />
<br />
If he makes these promises is he a liar now?<br />
<br />
Why is this not his “Read my Lips” moment?<br />
<br />
I posted this on another threads comments, but thought we should give it more attention.<br />
<br />
Penn & Teller explains Wealth Re-Distribution:<br />
<br />
<center><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/pz2p4EQtEXs&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/pz2p4EQtEXs&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></center><br />
<br />
No, no, no…I’m not TAKING pie from you…I’m GIVING pie to me…<br />
<br />
Now, neither one of us have any pie, so we will find someone else who has pie and NOT take pie from them…but GIVE pie us…..<br />
<br />
Sound familiar?]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2010-02-03T01:40:33+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>


    
    <item>
      <title>Reuter&#8217;s Story &#45; Backdoor taxes to hit middle class has been withdrawn</title>
      <link>http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/reuters_story_&#45;_backdoor_taxes_to_hit_middle_class_has_been_withdrawn/</link>
      <author>sanity</author>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject>Media</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder why Reuters pulled the story critical of this administration.</p>

<blockquote><p>
<b>Backdoor taxes to hit middle class</b><br />
By Terri Cullen – <b>Mon Feb 1, 4:09 pm ET</b></p>

<p>Millions of middle-class households already may be facing higher taxes in 2010 because Congress has failed to extend tax breaks that expired on January 1, most notably a &#8220;patch&#8221; that limited the impact of the alternative minimum tax. The AMT, initially designed to prevent the very rich from avoiding income taxes, was never indexed for inflation. Now the tax is affecting millions of middle-income households, but lawmakers have been reluctant to repeal it because it has become a key source of revenue.</p>

<p>Without annual legislation to renew the patch this year, the AMT could affect an estimated 25 million taxpayers with incomes as low as $33,750 (or $45,000 for joint filers). Even if the patch is extended to last year&#8217;s levels, the tax will hit American families that can hardly be considered wealthy&#8212;the AMT exemption for 2009 was $46,700 for singles and $70,950 for married couples filing jointly.</p>

<p>Middle-class families also will find fewer tax breaks available to them in 2010 if other popular tax provisions are allowed to expire. Among them:</p>

<p>* Taxpayers who itemize will lose the option to deduct state sales-tax payments instead of state and local income taxes;</p>

<p>* The $250 teacher tax credit for classroom supplies;</p>

<p>* The tax deduction for up to $4,000 of college tuition and expenses;</p>

<p>* Individuals who don&#8217;t itemize will no longer be able to increase their standard deduction by up to $1,000 for property taxes paid;</p>

<p>* The first $2,400 of unemployment benefits are taxable, in 2009 that amount was tax-free.</p>

</blockquote><p><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20100201/bs_nm/us_budget_backdoortaxes">Link</a></p>

<p>Four hours later this is now up:</p>

<blockquote><p>
<b>Advisory: Backdoor taxes to hit middle class<br />
Mon Feb 1, 8:07 pm ET</b></p>

<p>The story Backdoor taxes to hit middle class has been withdrawn. A replacement story will run later in the week.
</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20100202/bs_nm/us_budget_backdoortaxes">Link</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2010-02-02T14:47:54+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>


    
    <item>
      <title>Poll: Fox is most trusted name in news</title>
      <link>http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/poll_fox_is_most_trusted_name_in_news/</link>
      <author>sanity</author>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject>Media</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
Fox is the most trusted television news network in the country, according to a new poll out Tuesday.</p>

<p>A Public Policy Polling nationwide survey of 1,151 registered voters Jan. 18-19 found that 49 percent of Americans trusted Fox News, 10 percentage points more than any other network.</p>

<p>Thirty-seven percent said they didn’t trust Fox, also the lowest level of distrust that any of the networks recorded.</p>

<p>There was a strong partisan split among those who said they trusted Fox — with 74 percent of Republicans saying they trusted the network, while only 30 percent of Democrats said they did.</p>

<p>CNN was the second-most-trusted network, getting the trust of 39 percent of those polled. Forty-one percent said they didn’t trust CNN.</p>

<p>Each of the three major networks was trusted by less than 40 percent of those surveyed, with NBC ranking highest at 35 percent. Forty-four percent said they did not trust NBC, which was combined with its sister cable station MSNBC.
</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0110/32039.html">Link</a></p>

<p>Added to this&#8230;.</p>

<blockquote><p>
<b>Fox News Finishes Week #1 in All of Primetime Cable</b></p>

<p>Fox News was the top cable network in primetime last week, averaging the most total viewers between January 18th-24th. The last time FNC topped USA and came in first was during the week of the 2008 presidential election.</p>

<p>In a week dominated by coverage of the earthquake in Haiti and the U.S. Senate election in Massachusetts, FNC drew an average of 3.2 million total viewers in primetime (Mon-Sun).</p>

<p>Fox was ranked 3rd in total day. CNN was 22nd in primetime and 19th in total day, and MSNBC was 25th in primetime and 31st in total day.
</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/fnc/fox_news_finishes_week_1_in_all_of_primetime_cable_150010.asp">Link</a></p>

<p>Let the spittle-flecked flaming of Fox by the left begin&#8230;...</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2010-01-26T22:42:31+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>


    
    <item>
      <title>Indonesia mulls tearing down Obama statue</title>
      <link>http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/indonesia_mulls_tearing_down_obama_statue/</link>
      <author>sanity</author>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject>Politics</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
JAKARTA — Indonesian authorities said Monday they are considering a petition to tear down a statue of US President Barack Obama as a boy, only a month after the bronze was unveiled in Jakarta.</p>

<p>The statue of &#8220;Little Barry&#8221;&#8212;as Obama was known when he lived in the capital in the late 1960s&#8212;stands in central Jakarta&#8217;s Menteng Park, a short walk from the US president&#8217;s former elementary school.</p>

<p>Critics say the site should have been used to honour an Indonesian and 55,000 people have joined a page on social networking website Facebook calling for the statue to be removed.
</p></blockquote><p><a href=http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hFv1KDPbvngI1hk4Y8UFGhAJkDpg">Link</a>
</p><p><center></p><p><img src="http://i50.tinypic.com/kapugk.jpg" /></p><p></center></p>

<blockquote><p>
Obama, who was born in Hawaii, lived for four years as a child in Jakarta from 1967 after his divorced mother married an Indonesian.</p>

<p>The bronze was designed by Indonesian artists and depicts the boy Obama dressed in shorts and a T-shirt with a butterfly perched on his hand.</p>

<p>&#8220;The statue is of Obama as a child, not as the US president. His relatives and friends who erected it said it&#8217;s meant to motivate children to study hard and dream big,&#8221; Bintarto said.</p>

<p>Members of the &#8220;Take Down the Barack Obama Statue in Menteng Park&#8221; group on Facebook say Obama has done nothing for Indonesia.</p>

<p><b>&#8220;Barack Obama has yet to make a significant contribution to the Indonesian nation. We could say Obama only ate and s (expletive) in Menteng.</b> He spent his subsequent days living as an American,&#8221; the web page says.
</p></blockquote><p>
I do not understand why they would believe President Obama has some sort of obligation to Indonesia. He was there a short time as a boy, yes, but just because he is president now, why do they believe he &#8216;owes&#8217; them?</p>

<p>If the statue is meant to inspire then leave it up, but if it is political pandering of &#8220;make a significant contribution to the Indonesian nation&#8221;, then take it down - President Obama doesn&#8217;t &#8216;owe&#8217; you squat.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2010-01-26T12:51:15+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>


    
    <item>
      <title>Where are the Global Warming News Stories / Protests?</title>
      <link>http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/where_are_the_global_warming_news_stories_protests/</link>
      <author>sanity</author>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject>Politics</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Drudgereport.com</p>

<blockquote><p>
Winter Could Be Worst in 25 Years for USA&#8230;<br />
CHILL MAP&#8230;<br />
3 Deaths Due To Cold in Memphis&#8230;<br />
PAPER: GAS SUPPLIES RUNNING OUT IN UK&#8230;<br />
Vermont sets &#8216;all-time record for one snowstorm&#8217;...<br />
Iowa temps &#8216;a solid 30 degrees below normal&#8217;...<br />
Seoul buried in heaviest snowfall in 70 years&#8230; <br />
Historic ice build-up shuts down NJ nuclear power plant&#8230;<br />
Beijing&#8212;coldest in 40 years&#8230;<br />
Miami shivers from coldest weather in decade&#8230; </p>

</blockquote>

<p>&#8220;30 degrees below normal&#8221;</p>

<p>&#8220;Coldest in 40 years&#8221;</p>

<p>&#8220;All time record snow storm&#8221;</p>

<p>Where is the Global warming people?<br />
Where are the protests?<br />
Where is the news media?</p>

<p>Could this be more in the line of global cooling instead?</p>

<p>Perhaps, just perhaps, we should stop all the hysterics and really study this before making massive changes in the way business and citizens live their lives.</p>

<p>The &#8220;we now have more evidence&#8221; is a common occurrence in the science field. We hear it so many times when they have told us milk is bad for you, water is bad for you, and so many others, only to come back years later and say&#8230;&#8220;we now have more evidence&#8221; and eggs aren&#8217;t bad for you (I JUST heard that one a week ago).</p>

<p>So, perhaps instead of rush to judgement, we can have actual true scientific studies. Not slanted, not biased, but truly scientific studies. The world is not ending, the oceans are not rising so fast to swallow California - there is time, time to do things correctly.</p>

<p>And a side note, we can take the same approach to healthcare. We have time to do it right, take the time, make it something the US people can be proud of.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2010-01-05T11:42:28+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>


    
    <item>
      <title>Christamas Day Terrorism In Detroit, MI</title>
      <link>http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/christamas_day_terrorism_in_detroit_mi/</link>
      <author>sanity</author>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject>War On Terror</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><br />
<b>Reports: NWA passenger was trying to blow up flight into Detroit</b><br />
<br />
A Northwest Airlines passenger from Nigeria, who said he was acting on al-Qaida’s instructions, tried to blow up the plane today as it was landing in Detroit, law enforcement and national security officials said.<br />
<br />
A senior U.S. counterterror official says a passenger aboard a Delta Air Lines flight in Detroit <b>was planning to blow up the plane but the explosive device failed</b>, the Associated Press reported today.<br />
<br />
<b>Passengers subdued the man and may have prevented him from detonating the explosives,</b> the officials said.<br />
<br />
A White House official said the incident was an attempted act of terrorism.<br />
<br />
Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., ranking GOP member of the House Homeland Security Committee, <b>identified the suspect as Abdul Mudallad, a Nigerian.</b> King said the flight began in Nigeria and went through Amsterdam en route to Detroit. <b>There were 278 passengers aboard the Airbus 330.</b><br />
<br />
There was nothing out of the ordinary until the flight was on final approach to Detroit, said Federal Aviation Administration spokeswoman Elizabeth Isham Cory.<br />
<br />
That is when the pilot declared an emergency and landed without incident shortly thereafter, Cory said in an e-mail message. The plane landed at 11:51 a.m.<br />
<br />
One of the U.S. intelligence officials said the explosive device was a mix of powder and liquid. It failed when the passenger tried to detonate it.<br />
<br />
The counterterror official said the passenger was being questioned this evening.<br />
<br />
The passenger created a disturbance by lighting what was reported to be firecrackers—or perhaps a “powdery substance”—onboard the flight, injuring himself and several other passengers, according to Delta Airlines<br />
<br />
</blockquote><a href="http://freep.com/article/20091225/NEWS05/91225022/1318/Reports-NWA-passenger-was-trying-to-blow-up-flight-into-Detroit">Link</a><br />
<br />
Merry Christmas from Al-Qaida, you are in their thoughts.<br />
<br />
In a time of peace and love during the holidays, we must be ever vigilant against those that would do us harm.<br />
<br />
God Bless the passengers of the flight who subdued the man.]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2009-12-26T00:01:09+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>


    
    <item>
      <title>The Lesson of $50</title>
      <link>http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/the_lesson_of_50/</link>
      <author>sanity</author>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject>Humor</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently asked my friends&#8217; little girl what she wanted to be when she grows up. </p>

<p>She said she wanted to be President some day. </p>

<p>Both of her parents, liberal Democrats, were standing there, so I asked her, If you were President what would be the first thing you would do? </p>

<p>She replied, I&#8217;d give food and houses to all the homeless people.&#8217; </p>

<p>Her parents beamed with pride. </p>

<p>Wow&#8230;what a worthy goal. I told her, But you don&#8217;t have to wait until you&#8217;re President to do that. You can come over to my house and mow the lawn, pull weeds, and sweep my yard, and I&#8217;ll pay you $50. Then I&#8217;ll take you over to the grocery store where the homeless guy hangs out, and you can give him the $50 to use toward food and a new house. </p>

<p>She thought that over for a few seconds, then she looked me straight in the eye and asked, Why doesn&#8217;t the homeless guy come over and do the work, and you can just pay him the $50? </p>

<p>I said, Welcome to the Republican Party. </p>

<p>Her parents still aren&#8217;t speaking to me.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2009-12-23T04:07:07+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>


    
    <item>
      <title>Where is the Transparency you Pledged, Mr President?</title>
      <link>http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/where_is_the_transparency_you_pledged_mr_president/</link>
      <author>sanity</author>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject>Politics</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><b>“The Freedom of Information Act should be administered with a clear presumption: In the face of doubt, openness prevails,”</b> Obama told government offices on his first full day as president. <b>“The government should not keep information confidential merely because public officials might be embarrassed by disclosure, because errors and failures might be revealed, or because of speculative or abstract fears.”</b><br />
<br />
Obama scored points on his pledge by requiring the release of detailed information about $787 billion in economic stimulus spending. It’s now available on a Web site, <a href="http://www.recovery.gov">http://www.recovery.gov</a>. Other notable disclosures include waivers that the White House has granted from Obama’s conflict-of-interest rules and reports detailing Obama’s and top appointees’ personal finances.<br />
<br />
<b>Yet on some important issues, his administration produced information only after government watchdogs and reporters spent weeks or months pressing, in some cases suing.</b><br />
<br />
Those include what cars people were buying using the $3 billion Cash for Clunkers program (it turned out the most frequent trades involved pickups for pickups with only slightly better gas mileage); how many times airplanes have collided with birds (a lot); whether lobbyists and donors meet with the Obama White House (they do); rules about the interrogation of terror suspects (the FBI and CIA disagreed over what was permitted); and who was speaking in private with Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner (he has close relationships with a cadre of Wall Street executives whose multibillion-dollar companies survived the economic crisis with his help).<br />
<br />
<b>The administration has refused to turn over important records.</b> Obama signed a law that let the Pentagon refuse to release photographs showing U.S. troops abusing detainees, and Defense Secretary Robert Gates then did so. The Obama administration, like the Bush administration before it, has refused to release details about the CIA’s “black site” rendition program. The Federal Aviation Administration wouldn’t turn over letters and e-mails among FAA officials about reporters’ efforts to learn more about planes that crash into birds.<br />
<br />
Just last week, a State Department deputy assistant secretary, Llewellyn Hedgbeth, said at a public conference that “as much as we want to promote transparency,” her agency will work just as hard to protect classified materials or information that would put the United States in a bad light.<br />
<br />
<b>People who routinely request government records said they don’t see much progress on Obama’s transparency pledge.</b><br />
<br />
<b>“It’s either smoke and mirrors or it was done for the media,”</b> said Jeff Stachewicz, founder of Washington-based FOIA Group Inc., which files hundreds of requests every month across the government on behalf of companies, law firms and news organizations. <b>“This administration, when it wants something done, there are no excuses. You just don’t see a big movement toward transparency.”</b></blockquote><a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5joOOsTVD57lFwm_InpZY_nRbg4KQD9CDRVOO0">Link</a><br />
<br />
Before our lefty friends get all hot and bothered, start saying BUT BUSH DID THIS, WHAT ABOUT BUSH…that is not going to fly. This isn’t about Bush, his administration or a pledge of transparency. That is Obama’s pledge, Obama’s Administration and Obama’s lack of Transparency.<br />
<br />
It should not have to come to this to get information from our Government:<br />
<br />
<b>Yet on some important issues, his administration produced information only after government watchdogs and reporters spent weeks or months pressing, in some cases suing.</b><br />
<br />
Weeks or months trying to get information, many times when bills and actions are being shoved down the American Citizens throat before they have a chance to have the information to react to.]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2009-12-07T01:03:30+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>


    
    <item>
      <title>Spiegel Rakes Obama&#8217;s Speech over the Coals</title>
      <link>http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/spiegel_rakes_obamas_speech_over_the_coals/</link>
      <author>sanity</author>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject>Politics</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author seriously let&#8217;s Obama have it with both barrels&#8230;
</p><blockquote><p>
<b>Never before has a speech by President Barack Obama felt as false as his Tuesday address announcing America&#8217;s new strategy for Afghanistan.</b> It seemed like a campaign speech combined with Bush rhetoric&#8212;and left both dreamers and realists feeling distraught.
</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,664753,00.html">Link</a><br />
That was just the OPENING&#8230;.</p>

<blockquote><p>
Just minutes before the president took the stage inside Eisenhower Hall, the gathered cadets were asked to respond &#8220;enthusiastically&#8221; to the speech. But it didn&#8217;t help: <b>The soldiers&#8217; reception was cool.</p>

<p>One didn&#8217;t have to be a cadet on Tuesday to feel a bit of nausea upon hearing Obama&#8217;s speech. It was the least truthful address that he has ever held. He spoke of responsibility, but almost every sentence smelled of party tactics. He demanded sacrifice, but he was unable to say what it was for exactly.</b></p>

<p>An additional 30,000 US soldiers are to march into Afghanistan&#8212;and then they will march right back out again.
</p></blockquote><p>
Even though Cadet Commanders tried to give artificial support for the President&#8217;s speech, Cadets response was &#8220;cool&#8221;. Not cold, just cool.</p>

<p>But to be fair, 30,000 troops being sent is more than what was expected, and it&#8217;s got Liberals all tied up in knots. Is that a bad thing then?</p>

<p>Take for instance, Maxine Waters: <b>What are we going to have to do? Transition that government into a democracy? It doesn’t work for me.</b> Waters said Obama&#8217;s strategy &#8220;doesn&#8217;t work for me,&#8221; and that she &#8220;will not support&#8221; Obama&#8217;s efforts. Waters indicated Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee feels the same way. <a href="http://storyballoon.org/videos/maxine-waters-d-ca-reacts-to-president-obamas-afghanistan-speech-at-west-point/">Video Link</a></p>

<p>I know we screamed bloody murder when during the Bush Administration timetables were being bandied about, but I am hoping this is a GOAL not an actual timetable. 18 Months is a long time, and alot of progress can be made in that time. Obama also is not one to keep his promises very well, so even if this is a goal it most likely will not see the reality of Obama truly enforcing it. We shall see when the time comes.</p>

<blockquote><p>
It was a dizzying combination of surge and withdrawal, of marching to and fro. The fast pace was reminiscent of plays about the French revolution: Troops enter from the right to loud cannon fire and then they exit to the left. And at the end, the dead are left on stage.</p>

<p>Obama&#8217;s Magic No Longer Works</p>

<p>But in this case, the public was more disturbed than entertained. Indeed, one could see the phenomenon in a number of places in recent weeks: <b>Obama&#8217;s magic no longer works. The allure of his words has grown weaker.</b></p>

<p>It is not he himself who has changed, but rather the benchmark used to evaluate him. For a president, the unit of measurement is real life. A leader is seen by citizens through the prism of their lives&#8212;their job, their household budget, where they live and suffer. And, in the case of the war on terror, where they sometimes die.</p>

<p>Political dreams and yearnings for the future belong elsewhere. That was where the political charmer Obama was able to successfully capture the imaginations of millions of voters. It is a place where campaigners&#8212;particularly those with a talent for oration&#8212;are fond of taking refuge. It is also where Obama set up his campaign headquarters, in an enormous tent called &#8220;Hope.&#8221;</p>

<p>In his speech on America&#8217;s new Afghanistan strategy, Obama tried to speak to both places. It was two speeches in one. That is why it felt so false. Both dreamers and realists were left feeling distraught.</p>

<p><b>The American president doesn&#8217;t need any opponents at the moment. He&#8217;s already got himself.</b>
</p></blockquote><p>
Ouch - Spiegel does not pull any punches with this review of Obama&#8217;s Speech. Really is too bad that Journalism seems to be dead in America and the outside Journalists do a better job than the ones closer to home.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2009-12-02T17:26:11+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    
    </channel>
</rss>