<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

    <channel>
    
    <title>Say Anything: Reader Blogs</title>
    <link>http://sayanythingblog.com/</link>
    <description></description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>handnhalfsword@aol.com</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2009</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2009-11-21T14:49:30+00:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.pmachine.com/" />




    
    <item>
      <title>Hadley CRU Hacked—Freedom of Information Files Publicly Released?</title>
      <link>http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/hadley_cru_hackedfreedom_of_information_files_publically_released/</link>
      <author>Carrick</author>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Tuesday on the Air Vent (a global warming skeptic website), <a href="http://noconsensus.wordpress.com/2009/11/13/open-letter/#comment-11917">this comment was left</a>:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>We feel that climate science is, in the current situation, too important to be kept under wraps.<br />
<br />
We hereby release a random selection of correspondence, code, and documents.<br />
Hopefully it will give some insight into the science and the people behind it.<br />
<br />
This is a limited time offer, download now: <a href="http://ftp.tomcity.ru/incoming/free/FOI2009.zip">http://ftp.tomcity.ru/incoming/free/FOI2009.zip</a><br />
<br />
Sample:<br />
<br />
0926010576.txt * Mann: working towards a common goal<br />
1189722851.txt * Jones: “try and change the Received date!”<br />
0924532891.txt * Mann vs. CRU<br />
0847838200.txt * Briffa & Yamal 1996: “too much growth in recent years makes it difficult to derive a valid age/growth curve”<br />
0926026654.txt * Jones: MBH dodgy ground<br />
1225026120.txt * CRU’s truncated temperature curve<br />
1059664704.txt * Mann: dirty laundry<br />
1062189235.txt * Osborn: concerns with MBH uncertainty<br />
0926947295.txt * IPCC scenarios not supposed to be realistic<br />
0938018124.txt * Mann: “something else” causing discrepancies<br />
0939154709.txt * Osborn: we usually stop the series in 1960<br />
0933255789.txt * WWF report: beef up if possible<br />
0998926751.txt * “Carefully constructed” model scenarios to get “distinguishable results”<br />
0968705882.txt * CLA: “IPCC is not any more an assessment of published science but production of results”<br />
1075403821.txt * Jones: Daly death “cheering news”<br />
1029966978.txt * Briffa – last decades exceptional, or not?<br />
1092167224.txt * Mann: “not necessarily wrong, but it makes a small difference” (factor 1.29)<br />
1188557698.txt * Wigley: “Keenan has a valid point”<br />
1118949061.txt * we’d like to do some experiments with different proxy combinations<br />
1120593115.txt * I am reviewing a couple of papers on extremes, so that I can refer to them in the chapter for AR4</blockquote><br />
The data size of this download is 61 MB, it expands to 168 MB when uncompressed.  There are 1071 formerly confidential emails in this archive. <br />
<br />
The authenticity of many of the (formerly confidential) emails has already been confirmed.    It is too soon to tell if the data are legitimate, but if so, most of that data has not been publicly available before.<br />
<br />
<b>However, it is too soon to tell (as some of us suspect) whether or not “spiked” emails were inserted among otherwise legitimate emails.</b><br />
<br />
I’m not going to reproduce any of the emails here (some degree of caution is probably good in this case), but there are threads you can follow if you’re interested.  Let’s just say this stuff would make the Pentagon Papers look tame, if it’s true and accurate.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7801#comment-366001">Climate Audit thread.</a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://noconsensus.wordpress.com/2009/11/19/leaked-foia-files-62-mb-of-gold/#comment-11989">Jeff ID’s Air Vent article.</a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://rankexploits.com/musings/2009/real-files-or-fake/">Lucia’s  Blog: Real or Fake?</a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/19/breaking-news-story-hadley-cru-has-apparently-been-hacked-hundreds-of-files-released/">Watt’s Up With That.</a><br />
<br />
Update: <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-9111-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner~y2009m11d19-Global-warmings-hidden-files">Thomas Fuller's Comments at the SF Examiner</a>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2009-11-20T01:00:15+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>


    
    <item>
      <title>Global Warming and the Shredding Credibility</title>
      <link>http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/global_warming_and_the_shredding_credibility/</link>
      <author>Carrick</author>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Another example of climate scientists  shredding the credibility of climate science in specific and science in general emerged with the following crock of sh*t story.  First the story:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>“Abstract<br />
<br />
The current observed value of the ratio of daily record high maximum temperatures to record low minimum temperatures averaged across the U.S. is about two to one. This is because records that were declining uniformly earlier in the 20th century following a decay proportional to 1/n (n being the number of years since the beginning of record keeping) have been declining less slowly for record highs than record lows since the late 1970s. Model simulations of U.S. 20th century climate show a greater ratio of about four to one due to more uniform warming across the U.S. than in observations. Following an A1B emission scenario for the 21st century, the U.S. ratio of record high maximum to record low minimum temperatures is projected to continue to increase, with ratios of about 20 to 1 by mid-century, and roughly 50 to 1 by the end of the century.”</blockquote><br />
<br />
<img src="http://www.ucar.edu/news/releases/2009/images/temps_2med.jpg"><br />
<br />
Basically what they have done is normalize the bars to be equal length, and shade in the fraction of record high temperatures and record cold temperatures in blue.<br />
<br />
Here’s what happens if instead of fixing the length of each bar, then make the length proportional to the total number of records for each year:<br />
<br />
<img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2630/4110509261_489eff8a8e.jpg"><br />
<br />
When we do it this way, we see the truth:<br />
<br />
The decade 2000-2010 had the <i>fewest</i> minimum and maximum temperatures of any decade since records started being widely kept.<br />
<br />
They stopped their graphic in 1950, by accident or purposely selected to exaggerate the recent warming trend (by lopping off the prior warmest and wildest decade of weather in US recorded meteorological history, the 1930s).<br />
<br />
Once again they have undermined their own and the communities at large credibility by wildly exaggerated stories that are so easily demonstrated to be false.<br />
<br />
Hat tip <a href="http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/16/hall-of-record-ratios/#more-12867">the analysis of which the above replotted graphic is based upon.</a>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2009-11-17T01:24:13+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>


    
    <item>
      <title>Oregon lowballed cost of green tax breaks</title>
      <link>http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/oregan_lowballed_cost_of_green_tax_breaks/</link>
      <author>Carrick</author>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[More bits of tasty schaudenfreude from <a href="http://www.oregonlive.com/news/index.ssf/2009/10/state_lowballed_cost_of_green.html#_login">the lobotomized state of Oregon:</a><br />
<br />
<blockquote>State officials deliberately underestimated the cost of Gov. Ted Kulongoski’s plan to lure green energy companies to Oregon with big taxpayer subsidies, resulting in a program that cost 40 times more than unsuspecting lawmakers were told, an investigation by The Oregonian shows. <br />
<br />
Records also show that the program, a favorite of Kulongoski’s known as the Business Energy Tax Credit, has given millions of dollars to failed companies while voters are being asked to raise income taxes because the state budget doesn’t have enough to pay for schools and other programs. <br />
<br />
The incentives are now under intense scrutiny at the Oregon Department of Energy, which is scrambling to curb their skyrocketing costs. </blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2009-11-02T16:13:29+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>


    
    <item>
      <title>Karma is a  Be&#45;yatch: Old Person Redux</title>
      <link>http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/karma_is_a_be&#45;yatch_old_person_redux/</link>
      <author>Carrick</author>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject>Humor</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/mr8KrF8vNPM&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/mr8KrF8vNPM&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

<p>(Notice the air bag coming out.&nbsp; *gloats* )</p>

<p>(h/t <a href="http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/10/14/video-how-some-skeptics-might-view-the-rush-to-save-the-planet-now-meme/#more-11695">Anthony Watts</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2009-10-15T02:44:33+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>


    
    <item>
      <title>Why Obama Failed in Copenhagen</title>
      <link>http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/why_obama_failed/</link>
      <author>Carrick</author>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><a href="http://blogs.dailymail.com/donsurber/archives/789">It comes down to respect.</a><br />
<br />
President Obama showed none.<br />
<br />
And in the end, the Olympics committee returned the favor by humiliating the president of the United States, according to stories in the Berlingske Tidende newspaper in Copenhagen.</blockquote><br />
<br />
Nothing to gloat about over our national humiliation or the continued amateur hour at the White House, at least from my corner.  This is just sickening.]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2009-10-05T00:16:20+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>


    
    <item>
      <title>Sunday Night Funny: SNL Tears into Obama</title>
      <link>http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/sunday_night_funny_snl_tears_into_obama/</link>
      <author>Carrick</author>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<object width="512" height="296"><param name="movie" value="http://www.hulu.com/embed/OlZo4Fre6QDpvi0rsFwLgQ"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.hulu.com/embed/OlZo4Fre6QDpvi0rsFwLgQ" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowFullScreen="true"  width="512" height="296"></embed></object>

<p>There&#8217;s a reason they call him Zero.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2009-10-04T20:52:08+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>


    
    <item>
      <title>Cato weighs in on the disastrous results from the Massachussets health care reform.</title>
      <link>http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/cato_weighs_in_on_the_disastrous_results_from_the_massachussets_health_care/</link>
      <author>Carrick</author>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
<a href="http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=10268">Massachusetts Miracle or Massachusetts Miserable: What the Failure of the &#8220;Massachusetts Model&#8221; Tells Us about Health Care Reform</a></p>

<p>When Massachusetts passed its pioneering health care reforms in 2006, critics warned that they would result in a slow but steady spiral downward toward a government-run health care system. Three years later, those predictions appear to be coming true:</p>

<ul>
<li>Although the state has reduced the number of residents without health insurance, 200,000 people remain uninsured. Moreover, the increase in the number of insured is primarily due to the state&#8217;s generous subsidies, not the celebrated individual mandate.</li>
<li>Health care costs continue to rise much faster than the national average. Since 2006, total state health care spending has increased by 28 percent. Insurance premiums have increased by 8–10 percent per year, nearly double the national average.</li>
<li>New regulations and bureaucracy are limiting consumer choice and adding to health care costs.
Program costs have skyrocketed. Despite tax increases, the program faces huge deficits. The state is considering caps on insurance premiums, cuts in reimbursements to providers, and even the possibility of a &#8220;global budget&#8221; on health care spending—with its attendant rationing.</li>
<li>A shortage of providers, combined with increased demand, is increasing waiting times to see a physician.</li>
<li>With the &#8220;Massachusetts model&#8221; frequently cited as a blueprint for health care reform, it is important to recognize that giving the government greater control over our health care system will have grave consequences for taxpayers, providers, and health care consumers. That is the lesson of the Massachusetts model.</li>
</ul><p>
With the &#8220;Massachusetts model&#8221; frequently cited as a blueprint for health care reform, it is important to recognize that giving the government greater control over our health care system will have grave consequences for taxpayers, providers, and health care consumers. That is the lesson of the Massachusetts model.
</p></blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2009-09-24T00:38:54+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>


    
    <item>
      <title>AP: Obama lied and it is a tax</title>
      <link>http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/ap_obama_lied_and_it_is_a_tax/</link>
      <author>Carrick</author>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090921/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_health_insurance_tax_fact_check">FACT CHECK: Coverage requirement enforced with tax</a></p>

<blockquote><p>WASHINGTON – Memo to President Barack Obama: It&#8217;s a tax. Obama insisted this weekend on national television that requiring people to carry health insurance — and fining them if they don&#8217;t — isn&#8217;t the same thing as a tax increase. But the language of Democratic bills to revamp the nation&#8217;s health care system doesn&#8217;t quibble. Both the House bill and the Senate Finance Committee proposal clearly state that the fines would be a tax.</p></blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2009-09-22T06:08:34+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>


    
    <item>
      <title>Smoking ban heart gains &#8216;massive&#8217;</title>
      <link>http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/smoking_ban_heart_gains_massive/</link>
      <author>Carrick</author>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8267523.stm">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8267523.stm</a></p>

<blockquote><p>Bans on smoking in public places have had a bigger impact on preventing heart attacks than ever expected, data shows.</p>

<p>Smoking bans cut the number of heart attacks in Europe and North America by up to a third, two studies report.<br />
This &#8220;heart gain&#8221; is far greater than both originally anticipated and the 10% figure recently quoted by England&#8217;s Department of Health.</p>

<p>The studies appear in two leading journals - Circulation and the Journal of the American College of Cardiology.</p>

<p>Heart attacks in the UK alone affect an estimated 275,000 people and kill 146,000 each year.
</p></blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2009-09-22T03:13:03+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>


    
    <item>
      <title>Brits: Obama out of his depth</title>
      <link>http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/brits_obama_out_of_his_depth/</link>
      <author>Carrick</author>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/barackobama/6210152/President-Barack-Obama-is-beginning-to-look-out-of-his-depth.html">President Barack Obama is beginning to look out of his depth</a></p>

<blockquote><p>The President&#8217;s domestic critics who accuse him of being the sinister wielder of a socialist master-plan are wide of the mark. The man who has run nothing more demanding than the Harvard Law Review is beginning to look out of his depth in the world&#8217;s top job. His credibility is seeping away, and it will require concrete achievements rather than more soaring oratory to recover it.</p></blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2009-09-21T03:49:43+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    
    </channel>
</rss>