The two children chosen to front Richard Dawkins’s latest assault on God could not look more free of the misery he associates with religious baggage. With the slogan “Please don’t label me. Let me grow up and choose for myself”, the youngsters with broad grins seem to be the perfect advertisement for the new atheism being promoted by Professor Dawkins and the British Humanist Association.

Except that they are about as far from atheism as it is possible to be. The Times can reveal that Charlotte, 8, and Ollie, 7, are from one of the country’s most devout Christian families.

Their father, Brad Mason, is something of a celebrity within evangelical circles as the drummer for the popular Christian musician Noel Richards. Now a web designer and photographer, Mr Mason has been supplementing his income for years by providing photographs to agencies who sell them on to newspapers and advertising campaigns.

He said: “It is quite funny, because obviously they were searching for images of children that looked happy and free. They happened to choose children who are Christian. It is ironic. The humanists obviously did not know the background of these children.”

He said that the children’s Christianity had shone through. “Obviously there is something in their faces which is different. So they judged that they were happy and free without knowing that they are Christians. That is quite a compliment. I reckon it shows we have brought up our children in a good way and that they are happy.

Gerald Coates, the leader of the Pioneer network of churches, which Mr Mason and his family used to attend before they moved to Dorset, said: “I think it is hilarious that the happy and liberated children on the atheist poster are in fact Christian.”

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article6925781.ece

Of course the British Humanist Campaign, like good political spin doctors say it doesn’t matter. They just object as does Dawkin’s to parents labeling their Children as Christians; that is, until they are mature enough to reject Christianity. Of course the truth is, the children they found to be the happiest looking for their ads looked that way because of the joy of the Lord in their hearts.

The problem is, while these Children will grow up to discover Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy are myths, their inner knowledge of God rarely fades and even more rarely is rejected outright. The Bible tells us if we raise up Children to respect God, when they grow up they will not depart from Him.

Plus, who is Dawkin’s to tell parents they should not raise their children in their faith or to demand like some intolerant liberal that only morons believe in God and no intelligent human being ever would? Which tells innumerable scientists, even many of the greatest in world history that believed in God, they were all intellectually inferior to Dawkin’s and all of his God hating disciples.

Dawkin’s like any Communist is sure that belief in God is evil and must be stamped out for the human race to progress; and if he had the power, I suspect he would be just as bloodthirsty and ruthless in dealing with those damn Christians.

The real goal? A One-World Government using fear of climate change to get the support they need.

Coca-Cola is spearheading a coalition of more than 100 companies pushing a United Nations climate treaty to bind the U.S. to cap-and-trade emissions regulation, commit the world’s wealthiest nations to a potential $10 trillion in foreign aid and, possibly, form a proposed international “super-grid” for regulating and distributing electric power
worldwide.

Together with the SAP and Siemens corporations, Coca-Cola launched a website called Hopenhagen, leading up to the U.N. Climate Change
Conference in Copenhagen, Denmark, which opens on Dec. 7. The website invites the citizens of the world to sign a petition demanding world leaders draft binding agreements on climate change and advertises, as of today, “16 days left to seal
the deal.”

Other “friends” of Hopenhagen include media outlets Newsweek, Discovery Channel, Huffington Post, Cosmopolitan, Seventeen, The Wall Street Journal and Clear Channel, among others, Internet giants Yahoo, Google and AOL and dozens of other companies and organizations.

As was reported, however, Lord Christopher Monckton, a former science adviser to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, asserts the real purpose of the U.N.‘s meeting in Copenhagen is to use concern over “global warming
” as a pretext to lay the foundation for a one-world government.

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=116310

I believe Lord Obama will sign on completely and that our Democrat, filibuster proof Congress will pass the necessary legislation.

Many people scoff at any real one-world government happening, at least in the near future, but IMO that was always the goal of the Human Caused Global Warming Scare campaign (Raw, global power) and that along with our global economic crisis will bring what will be for all intent and purposes a one-world government into reality much sooner than most people could ever imagine.

The LHC is expected soon to be running with more energy the world’s current most powerful accelerator, the Tevatron at Fermilab near Chicago. It is supposed to keep ramping up to seven times the energy of Fermilab in coming years.

This will allow the collisions between protons on the machine to give insights into dark matter and what gives mass to other particles, and to show what matter was in the microseconds of rapid cooling after the Big Bang that many scientists theorize marked the creation of the universe billions of years ago.

The two parallel tubes the size of fire hoses send billions of protons whizzing around the collider in opposite directions at nearly the speed of light. In rooms the size of cathedrals 300 feet (100 meters) below the ground the magnets force them into huge detectors to record what happens.

Anyway the Large Hadron Collider after a 40 million dollar breakdown is working again and everyone in the scientific community are excited.

I just thought my detractors would like to see how the dumb scientists directly involved are still saying this will take them back to the Big Bang.

A 12-year-old girl is prohibited from bringing aspirin to California public schools without a note from her mother or father – but in many California districts she may sign herself out of classes, leave her junior-high campus without parental permission, secretly have an abortion and return to school before the end of the day and her own family may be none the wiser.

Parents and educators across the state have been in heated debate over school policies allowing children to be excused during class time without parental notification for “confidential medical services” such as abortions, birth control, and drug and mental health services.

They were debating changing the current policy to reflect school administrators’ interpretation of California Education Code 4601.1, which states:

Commencing in the fall of the 1986-87 academic year, the governing board of each school district shall, each academic year, notify pupils in grades 7 to 12, inclusive, and the parents or guardians of all pupils enrolled in the districts, that school authorities may excuse any pupil from the school for the purpose of obtaining confidential medical services without the consent of the pupil’s parent or guardian.

Pacific Justice Institute staff attorney Matt McReynolds told WND the statute is ambiguous and only says the districts may dismiss students, not that they are required to do so.

“If you use general principles of statutory construction, as we lawyers do in interpreting these things, ‘may’ is very different than ‘must,’” he said. “It doesn’t say they must dismiss them, which is how the ACLU, Planned Parenthood and the National Youth Law Center interpret it. It is a district-by-district decision on whether they will tell parents.”

“They can’t drive themselves anywhere, so some adult or somebody with a driver’s license would have to get them to those so-called ‘confidential’ medical appointments that aren’t so ‘confidential’ after all when you really think about it,” he said. “You’re talking about an older boyfriend, a boyfriend’s parents, maybe even a school official? Somebody has to get them there [and back] when they’re that young.”

McReynolds argues that hiding medical issues from parents may endanger the health and well being of a child [But the students belongs to the State and apparently that is none of the parents business].

”A parent who is 100 percent legally and morally responsible for taking care of their minor child may have no real ability to do so if they don’t know that their child just had a major medical procedure,” he said. “Or in the case of counseling, they may have no idea their child is dealing with substance abuse or suicidal thoughts or any number of other things.”

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=116315

First, I don’t think schools should be in the business of facilitating abortions, especially for minors. They should NOT be in the business of deceiving parents - ever.

In California confidentiality is so bad that even teachers being told by other teachers about life threatening problems of a child can face criminal charges.

I also must ask if this 12-year-old gets an abortion with the help of the school and without parental consent, if there are medical or mental complications following the abortion, who pays these costs? Why the parent, they never approved of the procedure? Then who? Well, probably old sucker taxpayers, making us accomplices to the abortion.

As plain as it comes, the newly “elected” European Union President, Belgian Prime Minister, Herman Van Rompuy, confirms the EU"s desire for a one world government. A New World Order of worldwide oppression and the spread of worldwide Communism. If it didn’t hit you what the EU project is all about, the new EU “president” confirms it for you in this clip. Recorded from BBC News 24, 19 November 2009.

http://video.aol.co.uk/video-detail/new-eu-president-confirms-new-world-order-desire-19nov09/17989978

Some see this speech as heralding a Revived Roman Empire that will rule the world. Well, IMO you cannot take this quite speech that far yet, but there are certainly causes for some real concern that a one-world government built on the backs of the world economic crisis, the desire to move away from the dollar on international markets, the Global Warming legislation that will require some sort of international body to enforce laws on every nation - supposedly good for every one, could create such a system and that in not many years from now.

It will be interesting to watch!

California’s Unemployment Rates rose to 12.5 percent in October to set another modern record, even though more than 25,000 Californians found jobs, the state Employment Development Department reported Friday.

October’s job gains followed 66,000 job losses the month before.

Stephen Levy, senior economist at the Palo Alto-based Center for Continuing Study of the California Economy, [Talk about a grasp of the super-obvious>] said larger job gains are needed to lower the unemployment rate.

“The best we can say is that like the nation, the magnitude of job losses seem to be declining,” Levy said. “This is not a sign that the jobs losses have ended.”

The state has lost 687,700 jobs since October 2008, a decline of about 4.6 percent, according to the state’s survey of 42,000 California businesses.

Nearly 2.3 million Californians were without work in October. The number does not include the nearly 500,000 workers who have taken low-paying or part-time jobs because that’s all they could find, or the 109,000 people who have given up looking for work, according to the state.

1. Isn’t that nearly 3 million in lost jobs?
2. Doesn’t Stephen Levy have a wonderful grasp of the obvious. It reminds me of brilliant football broadcasters that say incredible things like, “unless you get the ball into the end zone, you just cannot win games!’
3. I guess Arnold took “The Terminator” label too seriously and terminated jobs.

A 5-year-old North Carolina girl was raped and killed the same day she was taken from her home, according to an arrest warrant released Friday.

Shaniya Davis was sexually assaulted and asphyxiated Nov. 10, the day her mother reported her missing from the trailer park where she was staying, according to the warrant. Authorities embarked on a nearly weeklong search that ended when the girl’s body was found dumped off a rural road.

Mario McNeill is charged with first-degree murder and first-degree rape of a child in the warrant, which was issued after police said they collected hair and fibers, clothes, and a straw from his 1997 Mitsubishi Galant. He was initially charged only with kidnapping.

The girl’s mother, Antoinette Davis, is charged with filing a false police report, trafficking her daughter and child abuse involving prostitution. Her family members have said they do not believe the charges.

Why, if they have any evidence that the mother sold this child into prostitution would they not charge her with being an accomplice to all of the perpetrator’s crimes. Shouldn’t she face murder charges as well?

It’s like the Grinch trying to steal Christmas: Strict anti-padophile rules on Santa Claus letters close down North Pole

For 55 years, the tiny Alaskan town of North Pole has been diligently answering a deluge of letters addressed to Santa Claus.


But the tradition has come to an abrupt halt after strict new anti-pedophile rules effectively closed down the town’s festive service.

Hundreds of letters which have already arrived from eager children across the States may now be recycled.

The US Postal Service canceled its Operation Santa program which answers 150,000 children’s letter every year, after a volunteer was unmasked as a sex offender.

He was sacked before he could answer any letters, but the incident in Maryland sparked a nationwide clampdown.

Operation Santa had relied on thousands of volunteers to open the post and respond on behalf of Father Christmas, identifying themselves as the his elves and helpers.

These will now be replaced by a computerised system - blocking individuals access to children’s names and addresses.

However, the post office which serves North Pole, near the city of Fairbanks, simply cannot deal with editing out the names and replacing them with codes.

North Pole residents are likening the Postal Service to the Grinch trying to steal Christmas.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1229485/Its-like-Grinch-trying-steal-Christmas-Strict-anti-paedophile-rules-Santa-Claus-letters-close-North-Pole.html#ixzz0XQ0iRpON

A firefighter says he is in hot water with his department after his supervisors noticed his anti-Obama bumper stickers and banned him from parking inside the firehouse based on his political views.

“It’s freedom of speech as far as I’m concerned,” Hartford, Conn., firefighter Mike Di’Giacomo told WFSB-TV. “This is my personal vehicle.”

It seems to me that as a matter of Free Speech and equal protection under the law, either all bumper type stickers should be banned, which I would find odd to ban free political speech on public property; or, if they allow let us say the Pink Ribbons for Breast Cancer Awareness, they must allow all stickers that they do not contain any calls for violence or advocate a crime.

By the way, I love the first sticker!

A lawsuit has been filed in Washington, D.C., challenging a decision by the city’s Board of Elections and Ethics not to allow citizens to vote on the definition of marriage, as had been proposed by an initiative.

“The people of D.C. have a right to vote on the definition of marriage,” said Austin Nimocks, a senior legal counsel for the Alliance Defense Fund. “The D.C. Charter guarantees the people the right to vote, and the council cannot amend the charter for any reason, much less to deny citizens the right to vote.”

Such a vote already has taken place in 31 states, and 31 times voters have approved the biblical one-man-and-one-woman definition for marriage. Most recently, after voters in Maine came to that conclusion, churches whose leaders had supported the biblical definition became targets of homosexual activists.

The D.C. board decided this week an initiative to uphold or reject the traditional definition of marriage would not be put to voters. The board suggested the proposal authorizes “discrimination” that is banned by its own Human Rights Act.

But the ADF said no act unrelated to expenditures passed by the D.C. Council can preclude the right of the citizens to vote as guaranteed by the D.C. Charter, which serves as a constitution for the federally managed enclave.

”The people of the district have the same right as the D.C. Council to propose legislation on any subject not related to appropriations,” said Cleta Mitchell, counsel to Stand for Marriage DC, a proponent of the Marriage Initiative of 2009.

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=116578

Even those who have no problem with gay marriage have said it should be up to the states, but I doubt they meant the voters in those states should have no voice in the matter. Yet, time after time the voters are being denied their rights on this issue.