<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

    <channel>
    
    <title>Say Anything: Reader Blogs</title>
    <link>http://sayanythingblog.com/</link>
    <description></description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>ggoleft@aol.com</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2009</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2009-11-08T17:03:25+00:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.pmachine.com/" />




    
    <item>
      <title>ABC NEWS allies with Obama in a blatant Agenda to promote Nationalized Healthcare</title>
      <link>http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/ABC_news_allies_with_obama/</link>
      <author>dirl126</author>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps during the American Revolution those still loyal to the Queen felt as true conservatives do now: Disappointed, worried, isolated, and on the brink of surrender at the prospects of a nation about to change forever.</p>

<p>Obama puts a stone in my stomach when he proposes legislation that allows the government &#8220;new powers to seize key companies whose failure jeopardizes the financial system, as well as creation of a watchdog agency to look out for consumers&#8217; interests.&#8221;</p>

<p>But on top of this is something new.&nbsp; ABC News is turning programming over to Obama and White House officials to push for government run health care on a show called &#8220;Perscription for America&#8221;.</p>

<p>Despite Obama&#8217;s promise for bipartisanship, the show will exclude the opposing view.<br />
Folks, Obama is INTENT on Nationalized Healthcare.</p>

<p>The story is developing&#8230; I would read more @<br />
<a href="http://www.drudgereport.com/flashaot.htm">http://www.drudgereport.com/flashaot.htm</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2009-06-16T15:18:49+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>


    
    <item>
      <title>It Was Already The Hannity Show!</title>
      <link>http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/http_tvdecoderblogsnytimescom_2008_11_24_one_half_of_hannity_colmes_is/</link>
      <author>dirl126</author>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t you think that Colmes reminds us of our poor, old, weasley, and quiet Letterman?&nbsp; And doesn&#8217;t Hannity remind you of the loud, impending, down-your-throat Bill O&#8217;Reilly?</p>

<p>Sidenote: before anyone attacks, I love Bill O&#8217;Reilly.</p>

<p>They are lesser versions of their more-successfull archetypes in the business.</p>

<p>I don&#8217;t question Colmes for leaving, but really praise a man who made that difference by crossing over and being in FNC.&nbsp; Although FNC may not be &#8220;conservative&#8221;, it is to the liberals.&nbsp; He, in many minds, had taken camp in the heart of enemy territory; quite noble, in my mind.&nbsp; It is what separates him from Letterman, Hannity, but not so much O’Reilly.</p>

<p>I praise not one party over the other, but praise only an instance of what I think are good moral practices in politics.&nbsp; </p>

<p>Colmes should be remembered for his bipartisanship, because he certainly won&#8217;t be remembered for much else, the quiet fool! (...Hahahaha).&nbsp; It is the general idea that this soft-spoken man did not (or could not) do much for his party, but I think he has done something for the cause of bipartisanship.</p>

<p>Goodbye Colmes.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2008-11-25T04:31:00+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>


    
    <item>
      <title>Operation Chaos: Crossing The Line As a Reporter</title>
      <link>http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/http_wwwusnewscom_blogs_mashek_2008_05_09_rush_limbaugh_blowhardhtml/</link>
      <author>dirl126</author>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[The news may be late but the issue is still pertinent.  Is Rush Limbaugh overstepping his responsibilities as a reporter in Operation Chaos: his instructions that his listeners switch over and vote for Hillary in Indiana to create for a chaotic and drawn-out battle against Obama, weakening the nominee?<br />
<br />
The difference he substantiated by his instructions, as reported by him, enabled Hillary to win.  If so, then he has successfully tampered with the votes--an incredible power.<br />
<br />
Is it too much power? The Democrats DO have television, and Rush has talk-radio. I want your thoughts.]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2008-05-09T17:04:00+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    
    </channel>
</rss>