Home (Post) Mobile Authors Say Anything Register Login

Saturday, March 29, 2008

Zimbabwe: A Lesson in The Politics of Race and Leftie Economics

Find it here

[...]

Zimbabwe has become a textbook example of how to destroy an economy through heavy-handed governmental intervention in the free market, including forced redistribution of wealth (farms were taken from white farmers to give to blacks) and foolish stopgap measures such as price controls (which not only failed to stop raging inflation but, predictably, created shortages and black markets). Most of Zimbabwe’s current troubles can be laid at the feet of one man: Robert Mugabe.

[...]

The economic collapse of Zimbabwe, once the region’s breadbasket, has dominated the campaign. The opposition accuses Mugabe of misrule and dictatorship. Mugabe, appealing to national pride, blames the West — and charges his opponents as being stooges for former colonial ruler Britain.

[...]

Last July, the government of Zimbabwe was imposing price controls in an effort to stop galloping inflation. It was a predicatble failure. As I wrote at the time:

Things are going just swimmingly in Zimbabwe, where the very government responsible for runaway inflation is attempting to override the laws of supply and demand by mandating that all prices be slashed.

Yeah, that’ll work. Let’s check in and see how it’s going so far, shall we?

Plain-clothes police sought to enforce Zimbabwe’s new price controls by raiding shops yesterday as President Robert Mugabe’s regime waged a desperate struggle against soaring inflation.

They roughed up shop owners and staff and arrested 20 businessmen. Shoppers swarmed over supermarket shelves in the capital, Harare, intent on grabbing “bargains”.

Ministers claim that the inflation rate of 4,500 per cent - the highest in the world - is solely caused by greedy shopkeepers raising their prices for no good reason. Propaganda tries to portray businessmen as the true authors of the economic collapse - deflecting blame from Mr Mugabe.

But economists say that the prime cause of inflation is the government’s huge budget deficit, which it deals with by printing more money. This immense borrowing requirement is, in turn, the result of the wider economic failure caused mainly by the seizure of white-owned farms.

Instead of dealing with the deficit, the regime has imposed draconian price controls. Last week, the authorities ordered shops to cut basic food prices by 50 per cent after retail prices had risen by 300 per cent in only seven days.

. . . . Shelves in supermarkets across Harare are swiftly emptying and police in full riot gear linger outside.

The new controls force supermarkets to sell food at below its cost from wholesalers. Unless the regime relents, there will be food shortages, empty shelves and, eventually, the closure of all shops.

“We won’t be restocking. If need be, we might have to close shop rather than stick to government prices,” said the manager of one store.

Doesn’t anybody understand basic economics in Zimbabwe?

In October, after having imposed the price controls, Zimbabwe ran out of bread:

Zimbabwe’s bakeries have shut and supermarkets have warned there will be no bread for the foreseeable future as the government admitted that wheat production had collapsed following the seizure of white-owned farms.

The agricultural ministry announcement that the wheat harvest is only about a third of what is required, and that imports are held up by lack of hard currency, came as a deadline passed today for the last white farmers to leave their land or face prosecution for trespass.

The maize harvest is expected to be equally dire and price controls to contain hyperinflation have emptied the stores of most other foodstuffs. The World Food Programme says at least 3 million people - one in four of the population - will need food aid in the coming months. It describes hunger in some parts of the country, which used to be a food exporter, as “acutely serious”.

Around the world, too many on the left still believe that unequal distribution of wealth is the primary explanation for intractable problems of hunger and poverty. They support policies such as heavily taxing the rich and redistributing some of that wealth to the poor. They do not realize that poverty is a symptom of deeper troubles, not the cause. A nation’s poverty is a usually a symptom of bad governmental and economic policies, including laws that interfere with the free market and destroy incentives to produce. Corruption, violence, and lack of basic human freedom don’t help either.

“This is what Robert Mugabe has done to us, turned us into a nation of peddlers and beggars,” she said flatly, allowing her thoughts to then wander off into the future. “If he remains, we will just die.”

Zimbabwe started out as a prosperous breakbasket. Now, thanks to its forcible redistribution of wealth, it has turned itself into an economic basket case. A nation that once helped feed the world has no bread to feed its own people.

There is no surer way to make everyone poor than to take from the rich and give to the poor.

That’s exactly what the Dems want to do.

Comments

Sherman, set the WABACfor 1979.  I meet South Africans (Sooth EFF-rikanz)for the first time in Munich, Germany.

Over the next few years see how the US and its allies have been getting their heads handed to them in places like SE Asia, Iran, Central and South America, Africa and even losing elections to Communists, like in Portugal.

More accurately, how a Dem Congress and Jimma Carter continually pulled the rug out from under our allies in SE Asia, Central America, Africa and the Middle East in a non-stop cavalcade of criminal stupidity.

Teddy Kennedy wakes up from his drunken stupor long enough to pound the podium and demand withdrawal of support and indeed an embargo on Rhodesia and South Africa (then the RSA) against such Marxist-backed terrorists like SWAPO, ZANU and ZAPU.

He secures a US and European embargo against Rhodesia and South Africa, even though both have been doing a bang-up job fighting communism in the region in actions like Operations Smokeshell and Protea and fielding excellent units like Greys Scouts, the Selous Scouts and 32 Battalion. (ah.. but for the Grace of God.... )

Consistently ... it was the US Demoncratic Party that handed victories to Communists worldwide by feeding our allies to the wolves… and whom to this day remain blissfully unvexed by the bloodbaths of innocents that invariably ensued.

If there has been anything proven over time, it is the fact that the Demoncrat Party is in league with the enemies of truth and freedom, whatever banner it my fly under.

They are truly the domestic enemy.


...for great justice

2eaqln4.jpg

Move_Zig on March 29, 2008 at 09:28 pm

Move_Zig.  Well put:

They are truly the domestic enemy.

I saw this written for the first time in an Anne Coulter book.  I agree, unfortunately.  Maybe they are cowards, maybe they are trying to explain their cowardice at not fighting for our freedom.  Maybe they are thieves and want to be those who take from the workers.


Communism is evil

Chief RZ on March 30, 2008 at 02:17 pm

Thanks Chief,

I would not simply attribute this pattern of behaviour to simple cowardice.  Leftists are capable of great effrontery—they can be very invasive and violent in their demonstrations, be it keying your car because it has a Christian fish symbol on the back, to reaching out and attacking a speaker or protester they disagree with, to trying to pie Anne Coulter or whomever.

This pattern goes deeper than cowardice.  There is a seething hatred that drives the Leftist, a feeling of being victimized or associating themselves with some purported victim class and they see themselves as the avenging champion.  As such, any means is justified in accomplishing their ends.

But to arrive at their stage of foaming rage, they have to have a distorted concept of reality.  They do not and cannot objectively process data of the world around them. 

In short, they are not all there.  These are the kids on the short bus with hockey helmets and drool bibs.  You wonder why the Leftist trolls on this push continue to spout their drivel and are impervious to anything you have to say.  No matter how many times you expose what they have to say as a lie, they will come back and repeat the same lie time after time in an autistic mantra.

Given their alignment with the enemies of America—during the 1930’s it was Stalin and before that Lenin, after that Mao and Ho Chi Mihn, after that Nelson Mandela and every tinhorn dictator or tyrant that had troops machine gun a protesting crowd, the pattern is there for all who have eyes to see.

The Dims have consistently come down on the side of evil.

You will know them by their fruits.
-- Matt. 7:16

Moreover, you are judged by the company you keep and the vitriol that comes out of your mouth.

I think somebody once said…

Hear and understand: Not what goes into the mouth defiles a man, but what comes out of the mouth, this defiles a man. . . . Do you not see that whatever goes into the mouth passes into the stomach, and so passes on? But what comes out of the mouth proceeds from the heart, and this defiles a man
-- Matt. 15:10–11, 17–18

Listen to the words and lies of Abbie Hoffman and Ted Kennedy, Schumer, Fonda, and now Wright.  If the eyes are the window to the soul, words are its’ billboards.


...for great justice

2eaqln4.jpg

Move_Zig on March 30, 2008 at 03:57 pm

Well put again.  I am not being sarcastic, but brutally honest with this question:
Do you think that most liberals have or are under the influence of illegal drugs like LSD, marijuana, peyote or similar hallucinogens?


Communism is evil

Chief RZ on March 30, 2008 at 04:12 pm

A non-fiction book that shows the “workers” throwing off the communists is documented in brutal detail that I recommend:  The Bridge at Andau by James Michener


Communism is evil

Chief RZ on March 30, 2008 at 04:23 pm

Do you think that most liberals have or are under the influence of illegal drugs like LSD, marijuana, peyote or similar hallucinogens?

I can’t say that all are.  Given what I have learned over a lifetime of interacting with them, I would say they have a greater propensity to use narcotics than Conservatives. 

I’m not saying that the Liberal mindset is caused by drug use.  I would think the mindset lends itself to want to experiment and to continue to use drugs.  Liberalism is about defying governmental authority, until of course, it turns into Leftist authority, and thereafter the authority must be rigidly obeyed.

Thus drug laws are to be ignored.  Then again, new prohibitions, such as speech codes, and denial of self-defense rights are erected, against the clear prohibitions against their interference by the Constitution.

Perhaps a good illustration of this mindset are actions of Hollywood celebrities.  They are constantly going into and coming out of rehab.  The Liberal (e.g. Leftist) mindset lends itself to the use of mind-altering drugs.

To continue my sweeping generalization, I would guess that Conservatives, for their part, are more likely to abuse alcohol, like beer or the harder stuff, if they abuse anything at all.


...for great justice

2eaqln4.jpg

Move_Zig on March 30, 2008 at 09:54 pm

MZ: It’s harder to think under the influence of drugs, but it’s easier to feel.  Get what I mean?


"Give the lefties a pile of money, and they’ll spend it buying votes.” - Rush Limbaugh on the “bailout”.

robert108 on March 30, 2008 at 10:40 pm

I would say they have a greater propensity to use narcotics than Conservatives.

Not meth! That’s a red state drug. Libs prefer smack.


Yun Chu said, “You must strictly not express in words what is very significant. Both dragon and snake are killed in one blow.”

Sparkie Arbuckle on March 30, 2008 at 10:42 pm

MZ: It’s harder to think under the influence of drugs, but it’s easier to feel.  Get what I mean?

Are you trying to say you are under the influence of drugs right now? Or you expect MZ to ‘feel’ your meaning?


Yun Chu said, “You must strictly not express in words what is very significant. Both dragon and snake are killed in one blow.”

Sparkie Arbuckle on March 30, 2008 at 10:43 pm

I said what I said, not what you said.  Another word for “get” is “understand”.  Get it?
Since you seem incapable of simple logic, here it is:  Conservatives like to think, so they tend not to take drugs, because that makes it harder to think.  With me so far?  On the other hand, lefties go on “feelings”, so drug use makes things easier for them, because it disables that pesky “thinking”.


"Give the lefties a pile of money, and they’ll spend it buying votes.” - Rush Limbaugh on the “bailout”.

robert108 on March 30, 2008 at 11:08 pm
Avatar for Hannitized

Get it?
Since you seem incapable of simple logic, here it is:  Conservatives like to think, so they tend not to take drugs, because that makes it harder to think.  With me so far?  On the other hand, lefties go on “feelings”, so drug use makes things easier for them, because it disables that pesky “thinking”.

Yeah.

And did you know Republicans = Good and Democrats = Bad?

Also:

Dems hate their country, Repubs love it.

Dems poop sitting down, Repubs stand.

Er...don’t confuse me

Hannitized on March 30, 2008 at 11:16 pm

Er...don’t confuse me

Too late!

What’s bad for America is good for the Dems; you got one right, even though you are confused.


"Give the lefties a pile of money, and they’ll spend it buying votes.” - Rush Limbaugh on the “bailout”.

robert108 on March 30, 2008 at 11:19 pm

None of this off-topic leftie bullshit has anything at all to do with the abject failure of leftie redistributionist policies in Zimbabwe.  The black racism doesn’t help, either.


"Give the lefties a pile of money, and they’ll spend it buying votes.” - Rush Limbaugh on the “bailout”.

robert108 on March 30, 2008 at 11:20 pm

robert108.  Good comment and it fits actually.  Is there anyone out there who seriously thinks that Jane Fonda was not under the influence in the 1960s when she hooked-up with Tom Hayden?  Remember Timothy Leary? 

It’s harder to think under the influence of drugs, but it’s easier to feel.  Get what I mean?

For them, it is all about feelings.  I believe that they think that even plants and rocks have feelings.  Everyone’s feelings are important, but some feelings (liberals)are more important than others.


Communism is evil

Chief RZ on March 31, 2008 at 01:53 pm

Everyone’s feelings are important, but some feelings (liberals)are more important than others.

Well put, Chief.


"Give the lefties a pile of money, and they’ll spend it buying votes.” - Rush Limbaugh on the “bailout”.

robert108 on March 31, 2008 at 01:58 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses. Confirm your email address here.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.