Home (Post) Mobile Authors Say Anything Register Login

Friday, March 21, 2008

You mean….

...that putting a set of blades rotating through the air might be hazardous to birds, especially endangered whooping cranes?

Yup.

Leave it to the environmentalists to both pick our pockets for subsidies (wind power is heavily so) and risk endangered species.

H/T Ralphie.

Comments

Avatar for Steve

Well, see, we can put up big fences around the wind turbines so the birds can’t fly into them.

Steve on March 21, 2008 at 03:47 pm
Rob
Rob
19516 comments
Send a private message

I actually couldn’t care less about dead birds from these wind towers.  What ticks me off is that wind energy isn’t really viable at all right now.  It might be at some point in the future if we develop the technology to store the power these turbines generate, but right now hooking them to the grid is stupid because no matter what you’ve still got to have a baseline source of energy ready to supply all the power demanded during peak times of consumption.

See, if its really hot out and the wind isn’t blowing we’ve still got to get the power for all the air conditioners from somewhere, and that means traditional sources like coal plants.

And you can’t expect to have a coal plant sitting around ready to start pumping out power whenever the wind doesn’t blow.

Really, I’d be a lot more interested in seeing this country forget about wind for now and look at nuclear power.  With the advancement in technology there’s no reason why we couldn’t have clean, affordable electricity from nuke plants all over the country.


When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on March 21, 2008 at 04:32 pm

Certainly the lack of economic viability ought to make us reject this, but those that claim not to care about the monetary cost might actually care about eliminating endangered species.  No?

Probably the big issue isn’t storing the energy, but rather that it simply costs far more to generate using wind than you get for using it.  I’m all for having a little bit of extra capacity in an age when a squirrel getting itself killed at a substation can put all the states around Lake Erie into darkness.  I’d guess you might be the same.

Bike Bubba on March 24, 2008 at 08:08 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses. Confirm your email address here.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.