Write-in? C’mon!
By
ShoeMart
on February 7, 2008 at 11:40 pm
I originally posted this on the Bismarck-Mandan blog:
C’mon; you can’t be that childish, can you?
“My guy didn’t win, so I’ll vote for their guy; or cast my vote for Marty McFly.”
That’s like saying the Nazis didn’t win, but I’ll vote for the Imperial Japanese; or, at least, Mao.
I don’t want to start a kerfluffle here, but didn’t you state that Christianity is your most important factor ((I’m not into identity-based voting, but Christianity trumps any other principles.))?
Please check McCain’s record on abortion, same-sex marriage, church/state separation (the misinterpretaion of that amendment). . .
McCain is the most Christian candidate there has been in this ordeal.
His record on immigration is “spotty”.
His intentions with McCain/Feingold were good; he’s since regretted that bill - (strike 2, I know).
His opposition to Bush’s tax cuts are excused, since he wanted a decrease in government spending to accompany them - how is that a liberal position, again?
He’ll get my vote; I don’t expect that you’ll agree with him on all issues (I sure don’t), but I expect you’ll vote for him when it comes time. McCain’s my guy; however, if he doesn’t/hadn’t gotten the nomination, I would still vote for the GOP nominee; to not would be out of spite, plain & simple. And, please, don’t draw the Ford-begat-Carter-begat-Reagan line. Reagan was already well-established in ‘80. Who do we have, Ted Nugent?
C’mon; you can’t be that childish, can you?
“My guy didn’t win, so I’ll vote for their guy; or cast my vote for Marty McFly.”
That’s like saying the Nazis didn’t win, but I’ll vote for the Imperial Japanese; or, at least, Mao.
I don’t want to start a kerfluffle here, but didn’t you state that Christianity is your most important factor ((I’m not into identity-based voting, but Christianity trumps any other principles.))?
Please check McCain’s record on abortion, same-sex marriage, church/state separation (the misinterpretaion of that amendment). . .
McCain is the most Christian candidate there has been in this ordeal.
His record on immigration is “spotty”.
His intentions with McCain/Feingold were good; he’s since regretted that bill - (strike 2, I know).
His opposition to Bush’s tax cuts are excused, since he wanted a decrease in government spending to accompany them - how is that a liberal position, again?
He’ll get my vote; I don’t expect that you’ll agree with him on all issues (I sure don’t), but I expect you’ll vote for him when it comes time. McCain’s my guy; however, if he doesn’t/hadn’t gotten the nomination, I would still vote for the GOP nominee; to not would be out of spite, plain & simple. And, please, don’t draw the Ford-begat-Carter-begat-Reagan line. Reagan was already well-established in ‘80. Who do we have, Ted Nugent?
