Wrestling and Politics
I was thinking and…
Wrestling is a performance art. It is blatantly fake, often incorporating adolescent soap opera-esque narratives involving love and betrayal and folding chairs being smashed over someone’s head. Wrestling is marketed to ‘Marks’ and ‘Smarks’ by ‘Insiders’. Marks are the young, the ones who believe its real, who watch it all the time on cable. The Smarks are the ones who know its fake, who used to wake up early on Saturday to watch it before there was cable; but enjoy it for the aesthetic qualities nonetheless, much like attending a play and knowing its not King Lear on stage. Most Smarks are former-Marks and former-Insiders, but some began watching as Smarks and continue to enjoy the drama as Smarks. The Insiders are the wrestlers, the script writers, the announcers, the CEOs, and so on. Many could be double categorized as Smarks.
Politics, I offer, is not so different from wrestling. The only problem is that there are no Insiders, as this is a people’s government. That leaves us with hordes of Marks and Smarks. Now, the problem I see is that most of our politicians think that we are all Marks. How does it feel to be treated like a Mark? To be marketed to? To have the drama foisted on and be enticed into buying a t-shirt or donning a bumper sticker? To have emotional puff fluffed around for you to become mentally lazy in, to get caught up in the little narrative the Smark in the back room is writing?
Perhaps the country has some sort of schizophrenia where large portions of us switch back and forth from being Marks to being Smarks to being Marks again. That is my current favored theory. What do you think? It strikes me that if you feel I should include Insiders in my schema, you are just a lowly Mark. Is there a difference between Mark pride and Smark pride? Patriotism?
What do you think?