Home (Post) Mobile Authors Say Anything Register Login

Tuesday, June 12, 2007

What is “free speech”?

In 2004, Dickinson State University invited a self-proclaimed communist and admitted bomber of the anti-war Vietnam era to campus on the public dime. I was the Chairman of the campus College Republicans at the time.

This speaker, named Bill Ayers, was a member of The Weather Underground, a homegrown terrorist group that wanted to overthrow the American Government to end the Vietnam War, was paid for with student fees.

The 2004 College Republicans opposed this speaker (see press release text below) on the basis that it was a misallocation of student and public funds. We were accused by supporters of this man that we were opposing free speech. The fact is, that the Bill Ayers event in 2004 was not free speech - after all, it was paid speech, using student tuition dollars.

Which brings us to today, where the largest newspaper in the state of North Dakota has decided to attack those that are simply practicing true free speech and hurting no one in the process. The editorial is simply a parroting of the Democratic Talking Points.

So the lesson in all of this is that free speech is only good when it comes to one point of view, but not another.

Text of Opposition Press Release

FOR RELEASE: October 27, 2004

CONTACT: Dustin Gawrylow, Chairman - DSU College Republicans

DSU College Republicans Oppose Visit by Communist, Terrorist



Opposition to the Appearance of Bill Ayers on the DSU Campus




Use of student fees or public money.
The use of student fees to promote the agenda of a man such as Bill Ayers is an affront to the students of DSU who are accumulating debt due to the rising cost of tuition and student fees. The students of DSU, or any other public institution must be able to trust those institutions for which are becoming indebted. The use of public money is a disservice toward teachers in general for whom we constantly hear are not paid enough for what they do. If there is enough public money to be spent to bring in self-proclaimed Communists who were involved in the most violent era our country has seen since the Civil War, then surely there can not be that large of a problem for education funding.

Morality of bringing an Self-Proclaimed Communist and admitted bomber to the DSU Campus .

Beyond the public funding issue, as you will find in the enclosed packet of articles retrieved from the internet, this man Bill Ayers is quoted on the record with the following:

“I don’t regret setting the bombs, I feel we didn’t do enough.”

“Everything was absolutely ideal on the day I bombed the Pentagon. The sky was blue. The birds were singing. And the bastard were finally going to get what was coming to them”

“We tried to sound a piercing alarm that was unruly, difficult and sometimes probably wrong...I describe what led some people in despair and anger to take some very extreme measures.”

“We had hoped that the bombs would have done some serious work beyond the blast, tearing through windows, walls, and yes, people too.”

“We’re against everything that’s good and decent in honky America. We will burn and loot and destroy.”

“There’s something about a good bomb. Big buildings and wide streets, cement and steel were no long permanent. They, too, were fragile and destructible. A torch, a bomb, and they too would become undone or knocked down.”

“We’d already bombed the Capital, we’d cased the White House. The Pentagon was leg two of the trifecta.”



DSU’s Image.
Is it in the best interest of the school to have such a controversial person with a violently un-American history? Is it in the interest of the Alumni? Is it in the interest of the students that are attending DSU for the education opportunities? Is it a responsible way to spend public funds and student fees? These are the questions that should be asked before such a person is asked to speak.

###

Comments

Avatar for Hawk

I read nothing in that editorial that said that Grover Norquist did not have the right to be there.  You are mistaking free speech rights with the right to speak without criticism.

Hawk on June 12, 2007 at 07:56 am

The only positive achievement this speaker could have is to point out that your Student Council sucks big time. (then possibly some of you would see fit to take over those positions) It’s been several years since I held a position on the SC of a University but from what I remember, the right to allocate money for school events is given to the SC Finance Committee.  From the looks of it ... too many on your SC were from the “other side”


flag002.gif washC.gif Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Anna on June 12, 2007 at 09:30 am

Ayers was a criminal who advocated the commission of criminal acts; what’s the “free speech” issue?


Hope and change, in a free world, are the private possessions of motivated individuals.

robert108 on June 14, 2007 at 06:57 am

I don’t see free speech being an issue here.  Free speech is not affected by the University sponsoring this terrorist. 

The guy is free to spout his garbage on his own.  What we have here is support of a hater.


What’s going to happen to US industry when the global warming extremists like John McCain double the price of electricity?  I would think all these factories will close and set up in countries where they aren’t scared of technology.


The Whistler's signature
The Whistler on March 26, 2008 at 02:40 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses. Confirm your email address here.