Home (Post) Mobile Authors Say Anything Register Login

Thursday, March 29, 2007

What if the US attorneys really needed to be fired

A rare media story appears to support the Bush Administration in two of the US attorney firings:

Area U.S. attorney lauded in gun cases
The [Western MO] office could have been a prosecution model for two who were fired, Justice Department report shows.


At least two of the former U.S. attorneys fired last winter were criticized for their inattention to gun prosecutions, according to documents released recently as part of Congress’ investigation.


A performance review of former U.S. Attorney Daniel Bogden of Nevada noted that his staff lawyers “failed to consistently follow (Department of Justice) policies with regard to firearms prosecutions.”

For Carol Lam, former U.S. attorney in Southern California, the criticism was more pointed.

“The president has made clear he expects gun crime to be a significant effort, but (the Southern District of California) has only brought a fraction of the cases of other extra-large districts,” the evaluation read. “Despite its size and population it ranks 91 out of 93 districts in terms of average numbers of firearms cases since (fiscal year) 2000, doing only an average of 18 cases.”


Lam also was criticized for the “modest” quantity of crimes-against-children cases filed in Southern California.

According to U.S. attorney caseload statistics released recently, her district filed four child pornography and abuse cases in 2005, while prosecutors in western Missouri filed 47, the sixth-most out of 93 districts.

It appears to me that these two had ample time to realize that their performance was not sufficient prior to their dismissals.

Comments

Avatar for Hawk

What struck me most about Kyle Sampson’s testimony appears to be the plain incompetence of the senior justice department officials.  They say that she got fired for policy, yet nobody ever called her and discussed the problems they had with her following the policy.  That seems simple. 

Also Sampson, the chief of staff to the attorney general had only prosecuted one criminal case and had been lead attorney on 0 civil cases.  Combined with Alberto Gonzales that adds up to absolutely 1 criminal case they have prosecuted combined.  I understand that it is not a requirement for either of their positions, but experience should be a consideration.

Hawk on March 30, 2007 at 03:58 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses. Confirm your email address here.