Home Mobile Authors Say Anything Register Login

Thursday, April 24, 2008

What does one call it

When a memoir complete with source documentation is at odds with the so called “first draft of history”?

The Real Plan of Attack
By BRET STEPHENS
The Wall Street Journal

April 8, 2008; Page D8

...

Much of what makes “War and Decision” so compelling is that it is, in effect, a revisionist history, never mind that Mr. Feith was at or near the center of the decade’s most important foreign-policy decisions. So far, most of the books written on the subject—from Bob Woodward’s “State of Denial” to Tom Ricks’s “Fiasco”—have painted a picture of an incompetent and paranoid administration fixated on all the wrong enemies for all the wrong reasons. These books, in turn, have sometimes relied heavily on a series of self-serving leaks, distortions and outright fabrications, many of them emanating from the administration’s internal opponents, particularly at the State Department and the CIA.

Mr. Feith’s book does not lack for criticism of how the administration handled itself or even, at times, of how he handled himself. But as the memo cited above illustrates, most of the received wisdom about the dynamics of the first Bush term—pitting “warmongering neocons” and democracy fantasists such as Mr. Feith against more sober-minded realists such as then-Secretary of State Colin Powell and his deputy, Richard Armitage—is bunk, and demonstrably so.

Consider the notion that Mr. Rumsfeld was the author of the administration’s policies on terrorist detainees. On the contrary, writes Mr. Feith, the secretary warned against turning the U.S. military into “the world’s jailer,” deliberately limited the holding capacity of prison facilities at Guantanamo, defended the application of the Geneva Convention for Taliban detainees and argued that the U.S. “should not be holding anyone we did not absolutely need to hold.”

I’d call what we’ve been being fed as “news” a lie, myself.

Hat Tip: Instapundit

War and Decision
By Douglas J. Feith
(Harper, 674 pages, $27.95)

Comments

Randy Grapes
I heard that whatever Feith says in that book is 100% true. Undeniable fact. I see you heard the same thing. Tart.

Sparkie Arbuckle on April 24, 2008 at 03:20 pm

Hmm yes, if Doug Feith said it, it cannot ever possibly be true.

Kos told me so.

Ken McCracken on April 24, 2008 at 03:56 pm

One might assume that Mr. Brett Stephens, having actually read Feith’s book, would be a good deal more knowledgeable than a “philopsopher” from Bernie Sanders’ territory who hasn’t.


“Poverty of goods is easily cured; poverty of the mind is irreparable.”

Bat One on April 24, 2008 at 04:10 pm

Feith has done a few interviews that I have read/listened to. He repeatedly insists on calling what was described to the American public as intelligence “intelligence criticism”. I haven’t read his book, but I know of his personal contempt for the Geneva Conventions that dates back to an article he wrote in ‘85. That article framed the entire rhetoric. Find it and read it. You all we chanting it when the issue was ripe. Namely, if you don’t respect the Geneva Conventions, you don’t get them. Hamden smashed that. What’s more, outside Geneva section3 more protections are afforded, universally. The man single handedly provided the rationale for torture techniques that violate international laws (one’s we have consented to abide in the past). And what’s more, the FBI is flopping on ‘em. Spilling the beans.

Sparkie Arbuckle on April 24, 2008 at 05:49 pm

sparkless you ignorant crank,

Feith presents the source material.  He’s reproduced it all at his website.  You have what, again?


Out Here
Rodney G. Graves

Persia delenda est.
Latin: “Persia (modern day Iran) should be destoyed”

Rodney Graves on April 24, 2008 at 07:40 pm

randy grapes
how do we know if its sources or just ‘source criticism’?

Sparkie Arbuckle on April 24, 2008 at 08:07 pm

considering the amount of blithering he has been doing, it appears to me perhaps his parents didn’t hold him enough when he was a youngster. i’ve heard him do some peevish interviews on the radio, more than one. he really doesn’t interview well. perhaps that’s why he wrote the book. trying to generate sympathy for the next time him and Addington need to leave Austria in a hurry… like Saddam’s guy they picked up the other day had to do in ‘99.

Sparkie Arbuckle on April 24, 2008 at 08:19 pm

Doug Feith

“We certainly understood that these are the things that might happen. That’s why we wrote them down.

Responding to questions about his “list of horribles” that could and did occur from invading Iraq.

Ritual suicide seems the appropriate action for
Doug Feith.

WOOF on April 24, 2008 at 08:59 pm

sparkless,

comments as to style but otherwise the usual nothing.

woof,

had you actually read the article, or heaven forfend, the book, you’d find that quite a bit of what you know is just not so.  Don’t sprain any synapses there old dog.


Out Here
Rodney G. Graves

Persia delenda est.
Latin: “Persia (modern day Iran) should be destoyed”

Rodney Graves on April 24, 2008 at 09:21 pm
Avatar for Hannitized

sparkless you ignorant crank,

Rodney demonstrates:  Had you made an argument, I might respect you.

Sorry...i got that wrong.

Should read; If you make an argument, I will insult you.....it’s what I do.

Hannitized on April 25, 2008 at 12:00 am

sparkless,

With “friends” line hannitized, you should recruit more enemies.


Out Here
Rodney G. Graves

Persia delenda est.
Latin: “Persia (modern day Iran) should be destoyed”

Rodney Graves on April 25, 2008 at 06:15 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses. Confirm your email address here.