Home (Post) Mobile Authors Say Anything Register Login

Sunday, June 01, 2008

Was the Iraq War Worth It?

By Jeff Lukens

They say if it bleeds, it leads on the nightly news. The recent silence from the mainstream news media on Iraq, however, is speaking volumes. While the war remains unpopular, our success there has been unmistakable. The Iraqi people, with the help of the U.S. led coalition, have succeeded in establishing the world’s first Arab democracy. Their achievement is a milestone in the war on terror and for the cause of liberty.

Beyond the Iraqi Constitution and the elections, Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki has emerged as the true leader of the governing coalition. He has battled and won against fellow Shiite and problem child Muqtada al-Sadr and his militia. The Sunni, Shiite and Kurd people work together in a national Iraqi Army. Together, they are taking their county back from the foreign insurgents that have invaded their homeland. Iraqi troops took the lead in clearing Basra and Sadr City, and are now finishing off the insurgent remnants.

No one likes to go to war, but even an elective war is sometimes necessary. With all the consternation these past years, President Bush may finally be able to say “Mission Accomplished” to what he originally set out to do.

This we know, Saddam had Weapons of Mass Destruction. He even gassed his own Kurd and Shiite populations in the 1980s. What happened to those chemical weapons? Who knows? Whether they buried them in the ground somewhere or trucked off to Syria, we had every reason to believe he had them.

[...]

Following 9/11, we had to show we meant business in the fight on terror. Afghanistan fell quickly, but it was a sideshow. Look at any map of the Middle East and smack in the middle of it is Iraq. Think about it, if we could flip Iraq form a dictatorial state that sponsored terrorism to a democratic republic, there would be profound implications throughout the region. When most of the 9/11 hijackers were Saudi, we needed to show Saudi Arabia, as much as anyone, our resolve. Regime change in Iraq was militarily and politically feasible, so Iraq was where Bush chose to make his move.

[...]

Back in the U.S., however, liberal opposition to the war has at times reached hysterical levels and threatened to unravel all that we sought to achieve. Some things do not change. They have been acting this way since our days in Vietnam. And like our experience there, instead of finding ways to win they sought the worst possible outcome by unilateral surrender.

Liberals have never considered Bush a legitimate president. They have never gotten over the myth that the 2000 election was stolen. For them, Bush’s decision to enter into an elective war that took longer than expected was just too much. His presidency is too emotional a subject for them, and reasoning with them about any aspect of it has become nearly impossible. But for anyone who still cares and is willing to listen, what we are seeing in Iraq today is exactly what we set out to accomplish from the beginning—establish a beachhead for democracy in the Middle East.

Before the war, state sponsors of terrorism in the Middle East were Iran, Syria, Libya and Iraq. Today, only Iran and Syria remain—with a democratic Iraq located between them. And in the information age, don’t believe for a moment that the infectious seeds of freedom are not being sown in those countries and throughout the region. The promise of freedom for the oppressed is America’s greatest strategic weapon in this war. In due time, tyrants in those countries may come to fear their own people more than any army that may threaten them.

We must remember that the struggle in Iraq is only one campaign in the larger global war on terror. History will intimately judge, but yes, early indications are that President Bush’s victory was a worthy step in that overall goal.

Radical Islam is at war with the civilized world because of our tolerant values toward women, different lifestyles and different religions. For Americans, understanding the threat posed by this enemy, finding ways to triumph over them, and mobilizing public opinion to support that effort remain as challenges for the years ahead.

True that.  These truths need to be told over and over again, to combat the volume of propaganda that has been foisted on the American people about what we are doing in Iraq, and against terrorism in general.  It’s about time.

Comments

Same thing we did in Japan after the JAPS were defeated and unconditionally surrendered. 

The Iraqi people, with the help of the U.S. led coalition, have succeeded in establishing the world’s first Arab democracy. Their achievement is a milestone in the war on terror and for the cause of liberty.

This time, the cowards called “al-quaeda” slither away and hide in caves.  Then they sneak out and trick or coerce retarded people to strap bombs on their bodies and kill innocent civilians--all this in the name of some “religious” belief just like the JAPS we defeated in WW II.  How anyone does not understand this is beyond me.  Yes, a democracy in the Mid-east is a good thing!


Communism is evil

Chief RZ on June 2, 2008 at 10:50 am

The war in Iraq was not worth one life, American or Iraqi.
At first many were behind it because some felt that George
1 did not overthrow Saddam. George 2 would show them not to mess with the U.S. But the big, bad U.S. met with an enemy that was more resourceful than we expected. Thus we could not hit and run like we thought. Now after many have lost their lives we say that democracy is winning. I take issue with that. Democracy is not winning. Political stability is winning. The insurgents know that they will have to deal with a new American administration and are preparing for every eventuality. They want one thing: Occupying forces out of Iraq. I believe that everything is focused on that goal. This is a guerilla war. In such a war not all soldiers wear uniforms. They do not have the massive arsenal that we have. ChiefRZ says that retarded people were tricked or coerced into strapping explosives
to their bodies and killing innocent people. Have you ever considered that these were patriotic Iraqis who would make the ultimate sacrifice to force the invaders from their country? As in any war innocents are killed. We had no problem killing innocents when we attacked. As Patrick Henry said “I regret that I have but one life to give for my country.” I wonder how far Americans would go to defend our country if it was invaded. Tell me, ChiefRZ. What do you think about Americans who buy JAP cars and electronics?

ollie-B on June 2, 2008 at 04:41 pm

w: As a result of our victory over the Japanese Empire, and our subsequent occupation and rebuilding of their country, they are now a world power.  Iraq should be so lucky.  It’s moronic lefties like you who have prolonged this war and who have caused needless deaths with all your defeatist propaganda.  Shame on you all.


"Give the lefties a pile of money, and they’ll spend it buying votes.” - Rush Limbaugh on the “bailout”.

robert108 on June 2, 2008 at 05:09 pm

watashiwa.  It was Nathan Hale who said, I regret that I have but one life to give for my country, as he was being hanged as a spy by the British.  I lived in Connecticut and attended Nathan Hale school for one year.

What do you think about Americans who buy JAP cars and electronics?

All.  Please take note how I discriminated between JAPs (the fanatical “spirit warriors” described in Flyboys by James Bradley.  I make the same distinction between NAZIs and German citizens.  The “average” (90% of the Japanese citizens) Jananese was liberated by the US forces in 1945.

I purchased a Japanese car in 1984 as many did to oppose the union monopolies in Detroit. 

Any other questions?

Oh, as you know, the Iraqi people took their lives in their hands three times when they voted for the first time in history there to elect their own government.  Yes, it was and is worth it to defeat Alquaeda or whatever they call themselves there and not here.  The people in our country faced and fought the British soldiers.  We did not blow up innocent civilians in 1776.
If you would now like to debate what percentage of the population feels the need to blow us up, I will be glad to continue.  These people like AlSadar had the opportunity of standing for elections.  They declined.  Instead, they are trying to steal a country by violent means.  All they have to do is elect representatives and they can then vote to expel the USA.  If you noticed, we listened to the Turks when they voted not to allow the 4th Infantry Division to move through their country.


Communism is evil

Chief RZ on June 2, 2008 at 05:34 pm

ChiefRZ:
I knew some brave American said that. I relied on my conservative colleague to make sure. I am prone to make these mistakes. Otherwise, I will forever stand by my statements.

ollie-B on June 2, 2008 at 05:49 pm

watashiwa.  I don’t play “got you” here like some others do.  I was merely keeping things straight.
As you noticed, I don’t worry about typos either.  I will ask for clarification if something seems out of place.

Now, what about the remainder of my post?


Communism is evil

Chief RZ on June 2, 2008 at 06:00 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses. Confirm your email address here.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.