Valerie Plame Incriminates Self and Husband Joe Wilson
PlameGate: Although the criminal investigation and trial are over and didn’t find any wrong doing, there is yet another investigation taking place in Washington DC today by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. We shall call it the PlameGate.
What a dramatic pursuit this is on the part of Democrats to go after their Commander in Chief. After over six years of trying, this is the worst misstep they can come up with to go after the Bush administration. In this highly improbable situation, loaded with exaggerated claims and characters, the effect would be humorous if it weren’t so criminal. This is not going to be forgotten quickly by the voters; Democrats will be remembered for their petty and impotent politics.
In today’s heavily democrat led CIA Leak Investigation probing into why an investigation wasn’t initiated in the Valerie Plame name leak of 2003, it was Plame’s own testimony that could end up incriminating not only herself, but her own husband, Joe Wilson.
Incrimination #1: Valerie Plame, a Democrat by the way, recounted the morning of July 14, 2003, the day Robert Novak used Plame and Wilson’s name in an article he had written for his newspaper column.
Valerie Plame quote from today’s testimony:
“I found out very early in the morning, when my husband came in and dropped the newspaper on the bed and said, ‘He did it,’’ ‘I felt like I had been hit in the gut. Everything goes through your mind in an instant.’ “He did it!”
He did it? He did what? Who is he? Whoever he is, he did it. ‘He’ leaked the real name of Valerie Plame to the world that day. This testimony incriminates Plame because it tells us that she and her husband were both aware that a story leaking her identity was pending, yet they did nothing to try and stop it. Plame knew who ‘he’ was! Plame allowed her identity to be released.
Rep. Tom Davis, R-VA, as I did, questioned why Plame didn’t report to her superiors that this story was pending. One has to wonder why Plame didn’t want anyone to know this.
Incrimination #2: Former US diplomat Joseph Wilson, a Democrat by the way, was sent to Niger as a result of a memo written by his wife, Valerie Plame, to the deputy chief of the CIA’s Counterproliferation Division. In this memo, Plame suggested that her husband be sent to Niger to investigate whether Iraq was seeking uranium there to build nuclear bombs. Plame claims she was told to write the memo by one of her superiors. Dudn’ matter, irrelevant.
Plame testified that her husband, Joe Wilson, did not really want to go to Niger because he had he had already predetermined that he wasn’t going to find anything. This is incriminating in the sense that it implies Wilson was not interested in serving the best interests of his country, but was acting in a politically expedient manner.
Incrimination #3: Also at issue is whether Valerie Plame really was a covert CIA agent. Plame incriminates herself by saying she was a covert agent, but others say she was a desk jockey who walked uncovertly into the office everyday. Plame’s position with the CIA at the time of the leak did not meet the definition of ‘covert’ for several reasons, which is why Patrick Fitzgerald could not charge anyone with the crime of outing a CIA agent. Victoria Toensing, a D.C. lawyer specializing in white-collar criminal defense, has testified that “Plame was not covert”. She worked at CIA headquarters and had not been stationed abroad within five years of the date of Novak’s column.” Which is apparently part of the criteria that go into determining the status of CIA employees.
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Got Stupid: Sitting and standing behind Valerie Plame and others, during their testimonies, were strange looking creatures holding up ‘Got Impeachment?’ signs, and wearing shirts that exclaimed ‘Impeachment Now!’. Why is this permitted? This is disgraceful. Valerie Plame and Joe Wilson may have been good little soldiers at some point in the past, but what they are now is just a couple of opportunists and political activists, who are using this whole situation to line their pockets as a means of moving their political agenda forward.
~~~~~~~~~~~~