Home (Post) Mobile Authors Say Anything Register Login

Thursday, September 04, 2008

Unintelligence in Federal Intelligence Agencies

Unintelligence in Federal Intelligence Agencies

Joel S. Hirschhorn

The Bush administration has found yet another way to waste taxpayer money while providing huge sums to private contractors.  According to a survey of activities in 2007 by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, about a third of the federal professional intelligence workforce now consists of contractors, mostly in the Washington, DC area.

Out of a total workforce of about 100,000 people some 37,000 are private employees that cost the government (we taxpayers) about $207,000 annually, compared with about $125,000 for civilian federal employee’s salaries and benefits.

Contractors have lured people with important skills with higher salaries and benefits and have also siphoned off federal employees.  With this outsourcing, taxpayers are the losers.

What does this $82,000 worker cost gap amount to yearly?  About $3 billion annually is being provided to private contractor businesses that could be avoided by hiring government employees.  This is incredible Bush administration fiscal insanity, but totally consistent with how Republicans changed their views on the federal government.

In the past, Republicans used to focus on shrinking the federal government and its spending.  But then it shifted because they saw how increased federal spending could be used to increase revenues to the corporate sector, even though this requires incredible deficit spending, borrowing and costly debt.  What has happened in the intelligence sector has also happened in the defense area.  In other words, huge numbers of contractors perform in Iraq in addition to our military personnel.

To be clear, all these figures do not include workers such as food-service employees or contract guards, but only those actually performing or assisting intelligence functions.  Here is the breakdown for the latter: about 27 percent do intelligence collection and operations, just under 25 percent are involved in information technology services, about 20 percent are in analysis and production, and 20 percent work in administration and support functions.

Tim Shorrock, author of “Spies For Hire: The Secret World of Intelligence Outsourcing,” noted that the new data “shows that private contractors are operating in the most sensitive areas of intelligence.” He has also noted that “an astounding 70 percent of the U.S. intelligence budget is spent on private contracts. With the post-Sept. 11 hikes in intelligence spending, spying for hire has become an industry worth nearly $50 billion a year.”

IntelligenceCareers.com is a recruitment firm headed by William D. Golden, a former Army intelligence officer.  Golden says his company can hardly keep up with the demand for intelligence contractors. “The government has become addicted to the use of private industry in the world of intelligence,” he said.

If Obama wins the election and actually tries to undo most of the awful and fiscally stupid things done by the Bush administration, then he should mount an effort to de-privatize and in-source federal agencies, starting with the intelligence sector, saving many billions of dollars annually.

[Contact Joel S. Hirschhorn through http://www.delusionaldemocracy.com.]

Comments

Avatar for Hawk

This is amazingly bad public policy. 

Because they make a profit if there is more conflict they are incentivized to report intelligence that drives more conflict. 

There companies will also lobby for war. 

It is the same fundamental problem I have with having contractors in combat roles such as with Blackwater. 

The individuals might not be bad people, but it fosters a corrupt system.

Hawk on September 4, 2008 at 01:13 pm

Hawk,

Just out of curiosity, how can you honestly assess the efficacy of this “public policy” without both examining the alternatives and evaluating the accuracy of the final product?

Obviously, you have attempted to do neither, but then I don’t see that you’re in much of a position to do so.


“Poverty of goods is easily cured; poverty of the mind is irreparable.”

Bat One on September 4, 2008 at 01:33 pm
Avatar for Hawk

Well I was in intelligence for 8 years so I know a little of how it works, but you are right, I no longer have any visibility of it.

But if you incentivize people to give one sided intel, than you will get one sided intel.  When you make the gathering of intel a profit industry you incentivize them to make more dire assessments.

Hawk on September 4, 2008 at 03:45 pm

Hawk,

While I certainly endorse the notion that incentives promote results, no matter what the field of endeavor, I’m not at all convinced that you’ve established that the incentives described above by Mr. Hirschhorn are producing “one-sided” intelligence as claimed.

Besides, I’m inclined to think that intelligence, whether civilian or military, is not the proper venue for this sort of equality of opportunity versus equality of results type discussion.  I too have experience in both collection and analysis, and though its been quite a while, I don’t recall that being a full-time US government employee made an individual any more accurate or reliable in either field.

It seems to me you are confusing the development of intelligence with the development of policy.  They are not the same thing, and you know it.


“Poverty of goods is easily cured; poverty of the mind is irreparable.”

Bat One on September 4, 2008 at 04:31 pm
Avatar for Lestat

It seems to me you are confusing the development of intelligence with the development of policy.  They are not the same thing, and you know it.

It’s not a matter of competence, but of bias.  I think it is far more likely that a free market intelligence company will develop a policy and make the intelligence fit it.

Also what are the owners of the company doing?  Do they hire lobbyist to lobby for war?  There is certainly an incentive to do so.

Matters of national security should not be contracted out.

Lestat on September 4, 2008 at 06:54 pm

I think it is far more likely that a free market intelligence company will develop a policy and make the intelligence fit it.

Lestat,

Do you ever bother to actually read what you write?  Never mind what others write in response?


“Poverty of goods is easily cured; poverty of the mind is irreparable.”

Bat One on September 5, 2008 at 08:32 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses. Confirm your email address here.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.