Say Anything Blog

Find it here

Soaring food prices have inspired British farmers to place increased production ahead of moonbattery. The Observer is not pleased:

Government-backed environment schemes (ELS, or entry level stewardship) are having to compete with market pressures on farmers as crop values escalate. […] The Observer can reveal that a survey by the National Farmers’ Union shows that two-thirds of farmers who signed up to the schemes failed to renew them when contracts expired. They cited high commodity prices as well as ‘disenchantment’ with the way the schemes were now run.

At the most basic level, the schemes pay farmers £30 a hectare (2.49 acres) to replace cultivated areas with grassy margins, or to restore and manage hedgerows. At a higher level, larger payments are targeted at preserving rare and valuable features and species. The schemes have been hailed a huge success, improving farmland and wading bird numbers, restoring populations of rare stone curlews and cirl bunting, and protecting the traditional cornflower and small mammals such as the harvest mouse.

You read correctly: farmers are being paid with public funds to protect mice instead of grow crops.

[...]

British bureauweenies ought to follow the lead of Zimbabwe. Just confiscate the land, and redistribute it to people who have no idea how to farm. That would put an end to all this awful food production, and allow the sacred mice and weeds to flourish.

That’s the problem with collectivism: Some individual is always getting some type of idea that doesn’t go along with the ideology.  Coercion is required to make collectivism “work”.(or “not work”, in this case)