Home (Post) Mobile Authors Say Anything Register Login

Friday, February 15, 2008

Tom Tancredo Tells Off the President of Mexico

Find it here

Tancredo Letter to Mexican President Calderon

President Calderon:

I was disappointed by misguided comments you recently made regarding U.S.-Mexico relations and U.S. immigration laws. Purveying misinformation and absurd allegations is hardly a positive step to building a constructive partnership.

According to the Associated Press you recently said, “You have two economies. One economy is intensive in capital, which is the American economy. One economy is intensive in labor, which is the Mexican economy. We are two complementary economies, and that phenomenon is impossible to stop.” Yes, both countries benefit by the 85% of Mexico’s manufacturing exports that come to the U.S., but people are not commodities. While I appreciate your concern for our joint prosperity, the economic and social ills that plague your country cannot be resolved by simply exporting your citizens to the United States.

It is undeniable that Mexico faces major challenges. Endemic corruption and the power of violent drug cartels still dominate everyday life across Mexico. Beyond the headlines, Mexico has deep institutional maladies. Mexico’s absurdly antiquated Napoleonic-inquisition styled legal system and the squandering of robust energy-industry opportunity by a poorly managed, state-run Pemex monopoly are just two examples of the kind of self-inflicted wounds that hobble your troubled nation.

I understand that you are attempting to resolve some of these problems and applaud your leadership in trying to do so. But what would contribute more to the long term stability of your economy and your country would be to focus more energy on addressing your domestic challenges and less on lobbying the U.S. to provide amnesty for Mexicans who have illegally entered this country with the blessing of your government. In doing so, you might be able to keep Mexico’s “best and brightest young men” in Mexico – where they can contribute more to Mexico’s economy than remittance payments. Unfortunately, your recent comments indicate that Mexico will continue its policy of encouraging illegal immigration and treating the United States as little more than a dumping ground for your social and economic problems.

In your speech yesterday to the California State legislature, you lectured the American people on how to improve our immigration policies. Why did you not propose that we model our policies on Mexico’s own policies toward illegal entry across your own southern border? Mexico expends enormous resources to prevent Guatemalans, Hondurans and Salvadorans from entering the country illegally, but you castigate the United States for wanting secure borders. Mr. President, in my neighborhood that is called hypocrisy.

[...]

President Calderon, I respectfully suggest that the next time you visit our country, rather than trying to influence U.S. policymakers or our election process, you take time to listen to Americans rather than lecture them. If you want to make changes in government policies, apply your energies to Mexico’s laundry list of problems rather than meddling in domestic American politics.

Read the whole thing.  Real “straight talk” from a real conservative.

Comments

Real “straight talk” from a real conservative.

Who was soundly rejected by the free market of our election system.


“If a conservative is still a republican after the last 13 years, he is blind to the fact that his party of choice has failed him utterly.” – Realitybasedbob

realitybasedbob on February 15, 2008 at 05:55 pm

Master Baiter: Our elections aren’t a “free market”.  They are an oligopoly.  Missed again.


Media uncovers more Palin stories in one weekend than Obama stories in two years. Still no bias detected

Obama: more experienced than Bristol Palin

robert108 on February 15, 2008 at 06:01 pm

And not only does this gem not become president...the poor election results have convinced him to abandon his seat.

Sad day. Sad day.

Master Baiter: Our elections aren’t a “free market”.  They are an oligopoly.  Missed again.

Oligopoly? Ehhh, I think that’s pushing it.

Elections are more like a WWE writing bloq. The writers tell us who they’re pushing, and we decide out of that group who we like...if anyone. No one looks at the undercard or jobbers, even though they may be some of the most talented people in the race.

Our elections don’t really resemble free markets or oligopoly.


Obama/Biden is not change. It’s more of the same.

Kenny on February 16, 2008 at 01:07 am

Oligopoly? Ehhh, I think that’s pushing it.

Not really; “oligopoly” means “few sellers”, which is a pretty accurate description of an election.  I was simply replying to Master Baiter’s idiotic claim that elections are a “free market”.  Perhaps “rigged market” would also have been accurate.


Media uncovers more Palin stories in one weekend than Obama stories in two years. Still no bias detected

Obama: more experienced than Bristol Palin

robert108 on February 16, 2008 at 09:07 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses. Confirm your email address here.