Home (Post) Mobile Authors Say Anything Register Login

Wednesday, November 15, 2006

Time For ND Republicans to Earn Their Majority

Now that the elections are over, there is still one major task that the citizens and voters of this state must undertake.  We must tell our representatives that we will not accept a 12.7% increase of the total state budget again; and that we will not accept such a large overall increase while the education budget is increased by only 3.5%. 

During the last legislative session spending on quote “general government” increased by 26.3% ($79million) while funding for education increased by 3.5% ($31 million).  While the document these figures are cited from does not define “general government,” it is certainly not a stretch to say these numbers are a little lopsided and should probably have been reversed. 

If the current majority wants to prove that it still is a vehicle for fiscal conservatism it will make actual cuts in the cost of “general government;” actual cuts, not just cuts in the rate of growth.  These cuts can then be added to the governors plan to increase education funding without a tax increase and without tapping the surplus.

There are still reasons that North Dakota votes for Republicans, and it is not to increase spending by 12.7%.  The voters of this state must not allow their elected representatives to squander their money.  It is bad enough that the taxpayers of this state were overcharged in the first place, but the surplus must not be used to pump up the ongoing budget outlays for the state, in turn causing future increases in taxation to be needed.

One priority for the surplus must be used to relieve property taxes by increasing funding to education. That increased state funding must be tied to local subdivisions either cutting property taxes or developing their own rainy-day fund.  Any state relief must be tied to the understanding that the funding is not for new spending.

A portion of the surplus must also be used to stem the skyrocketing cost of college tuition.  If the rate of tuition is not restrained the state will lose the competitive advantage of cost over schools in Minnesota and elsewhere.

No matter what the surplus is spent on, our representatives must be held responsible.  If the surplus is squandered on pet projects and obscene increases of spending, it can be assured that the current majority party will lose even more seats than it did last Tuesday.  The people elected them as conservatives, now it is time for them to be conservative.

Comments

I still say with that surplus, the state of North Dakota needs to eliminate the State Income Tax.  Also, I agree with more state funding for education while rolling back property taxes.

bak72 on November 15, 2006 at 08:36 pm

I still say with that surplus, the state of North Dakota needs to eliminate the State Income Tax.

I can go for that.

The state has no responsibility for property tax.  Property taxes are assessed by local entities. 

You’re fooling yourself to think that giving more money to school districts will cut property taxes.

They’ll merely spend the money as they’ve done the last five years.

In the last five years at least in Grand Forks the other local entities have increased taxes just as much as the school districts.


What’s going to happen to US industry when the global warming extremists like John McCain double the price of electricity?  I would think all these factories will close and set up in countries where they aren’t scared of technology.


The Whistler's signature
The Whistler on November 16, 2006 at 04:34 am
Rob
Rob
19444 comments
Send a private message

I still say with that surplus, the state of North Dakota needs to eliminate the State Income Tax.  Also, I agree with more state funding for education while rolling back property taxes.

So we’d get rid of the income tax and just keep the straight sales tax?  Sounds like a winner to me.  Not only would it make ND’s tax code simpler, it would also put more money in the pockets of North Dakotans.

As for more money for ND’s schools, I think we spend enough now.  I’d rather see them institute some accountability measures for how that money is spent.


When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on November 16, 2006 at 04:49 am
Avatar for Puzzlefeet

First of all, the income tax is here to stay in ND.  But I think it would be an interesting challenge for the Nodakers on this blog to go through the governor’s budget when it is released in early December.  I challenge each of you to go through it and decide which programs can be cut and how much they should be cut.  Now keep in mind that ND has an increasing aging population with nursing homes in almost every community and on almost every nursing home board sits a legislator.  And also keep in mind that there is health care, which also increases more than the cost of living and affect the senior population in ND.

The 2007-09 budget will be on the states website soon after the Governors budget speech in early December during the organizing pre-legislative session.

Puzzlefeet on November 16, 2006 at 07:51 am

Keep in mind that when lefties talk about “cuts”, what they really mean is a decrease in the rate of increase.
Lefties lie.


"Give the lefties a pile of money, and they’ll spend it buying votes.” - Rush Limbaugh on the “bailout”.

robert108 on November 16, 2006 at 07:54 am

the income tax is here to stay in ND

“We fear change.”

keep in mind that ND has an increasing aging population with nursing homes in almost every community

I’ve been wondering how much of the state budget is spent on Nursing Homes.  I certainly accept that if a person has no assets and can no longer work we need to take care of them.  Do you have any idea?


What’s going to happen to US industry when the global warming extremists like John McCain double the price of electricity?  I would think all these factories will close and set up in countries where they aren’t scared of technology.


The Whistler's signature
The Whistler on November 16, 2006 at 07:55 am

Do you have any idea?

Yes.  A Social Security system that really provides social security.  That would be one that is based on an investment model, not a pyramid scheme that continues to rip off the taxpayers, and is essentially a welfare program.


"Give the lefties a pile of money, and they’ll spend it buying votes.” - Rush Limbaugh on the “bailout”.

robert108 on November 16, 2006 at 07:59 am

Also, I agree with more state funding for education…

Yes, they are doing so well, let’s just give them more taxpayer money!  Great idea!(not)
Here’s a general hint: Especially with declining school enrollment, having to spend more money on education each year is a sign of failure!  Anything above the rate of inflation is a waste.


"Give the lefties a pile of money, and they’ll spend it buying votes.” - Rush Limbaugh on the “bailout”.

robert108 on November 16, 2006 at 08:02 am

I still say with that surplus, the state of North Dakota needs to eliminate the State Income Tax.

Any state income tax that’s related to the payment of federal income tax is baseless. Most say something like, “if you pay a federal income tax you must” There is no law authorizing fed income tax on individuals. The 16th amendment did not include any new taxation laws despite what the IRS would have you believe. Smoke and mirrors to the tune of 950 billion a year.


Yun Chu said, “You must strictly not express in words what is very significant. Both dragon and snake are killed in one blow.”

Sparkie Arbuckle on November 16, 2006 at 08:31 am

robert108,

North Dakota public education isnt as bad as the rest of the country.  Our teachers are the lowest paid in the country and the student score among the top 4 states every year.

So we are actually getting fairly good value for our money.  Sure there is room for improvement, but it’s not as bad here as many places so additional state level spend is actually over due.

freerepublicans.com on November 16, 2006 at 08:58 am

So we are actually getting fairly good value for our money.

Only if you compare it to the rest of a bad system.  Where do you stand in the world?  Your attempt to justify throwing good money after bad is still wrong.


"Give the lefties a pile of money, and they’ll spend it buying votes.” - Rush Limbaugh on the “bailout”.

robert108 on November 16, 2006 at 09:02 am
Avatar for Bat One

First of all, the income tax is here to stay in ND.

Gee, Puzzle,

I thought Democrats were the ones who had all those “new ideas.” Your take on the state income tax sounds like the same old Democrat love affair with taxes.  Period.  No new thinking there.

In Georgia, Republican Governor Sonny Perdue (overwhelmingly re-elected), and the GOP controlled State Legislature are publicly committed to the elimination of the state income tax.

Perhaps if Democrats were less committed to talking about new ideas, and more committed to actually coming up with some…

Bat One on November 16, 2006 at 09:25 am

Any state income tax that’s related to the payment of federal income tax is baseless.

Snarky the ND income tax is no longer tied to the federal income tax. 

Of course the state snuck in a huge tax increase when they pulled that maneuver to delink the state income tax from the federal income tax. 

That’s one of the reasons why we have a surplus.


What’s going to happen to US industry when the global warming extremists like John McCain double the price of electricity?  I would think all these factories will close and set up in countries where they aren’t scared of technology.


The Whistler's signature
The Whistler on November 16, 2006 at 09:45 am
Avatar for Puzzlefeet

B1, snarky as usual today, eh?  So your idea is the use of the sales tax as the primary tax, now that’s real original new idea.

Puzzlefeet on November 16, 2006 at 10:56 am
Rob
Rob
19444 comments
Send a private message

So your idea is the use of the sales tax as the primary tax, now that’s real original new idea.

It’s an idea that’s been discussed a lot, but not tried a lot.

Personally, I like the idea of a consumption tax.  I’ve advocated for it on the national level, and I certainly think it’s right for North Dakota.

It is eminently fair.  Those who buy more pay more.  Those who buy less pay less.  But everyone pays some.

As for the Governor’s budget, I’ll have you know that this conservative plans on being very critical of Republicans (and Democrats) up to and including the Governor if we get a bunch of spending this legislative session with no real tax relief.


When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on November 16, 2006 at 11:02 am
Avatar for Puzzlefeet

Whistler, here is a link to testimony given during the last legislative session on senior services:  http://www.nd.gov/humanservices/info/testimony/house-approp-hr/hb1012-ltc-hcbs-2005-01-13.html.  I should have also added the home and community based services as well.  more and more elderly are wanting to remain in their homes and it is cheaper to keep the elderly in their homes than in a nursing home. 

R108, you and I will never agree on SS but the average 55 year old has about $50,000 in their 401 K.  Not hardly enough to live off when they turn 65 or 70 or 75.  Social Security is not meant to be an investment it is a safety net. 

Oh, and this comment of yours: 

Especially with declining school enrollment, having to spend more money on education each year is a sign of failure! 

Wrong!

For example in ND with declining enrollments, you still have to have a classroom with a teacher etc… The state has been trying to get schools to consolidate between communities but this is extremely difficult because most small communities know that when the school is closed, the town will soon dry up as well, so there is reluctance to consolidate. it is not a sign of failure.  But you go ahead and stick to your talking points as usual.

Puzzlefeet on November 16, 2006 at 11:06 am

R108, you and I will never agree on SS but the average 55 year old has about $50,000 in their 401 K.

How much money is in their Social Security account?  HAHA.

The problem is that the government takes a huge chunk of your earnings so it’s hard to save for retirement.  In fact Social Security taxes amount to about 14% of your income.  That’s plenty to build a nice retirement.  Unfortunately FDR raided the first Social Security surplus and every politician after has followed suit.

Why do you condone theft Puzzled?


What’s going to happen to US industry when the global warming extremists like John McCain double the price of electricity?  I would think all these factories will close and set up in countries where they aren’t scared of technology.


The Whistler's signature
The Whistler on November 16, 2006 at 11:11 am

Puzzled.  Thanks for the link though.  Am I reading it right that ND aid to nursing home bound seniors is under $20 million.  I would have thought it was a lot more.

So thanks but I do have to take issue with this:

For example in ND with declining enrollments, you still have to have a classroom with a teacher etc…

The problems with out of control school spending are with the big districts where they can streamline their offerings.  That’s where the big tax increases have come about, not because of need, but because property values went up.  Whee Free Money for local governments to spend!


What’s going to happen to US industry when the global warming extremists like John McCain double the price of electricity?  I would think all these factories will close and set up in countries where they aren’t scared of technology.


The Whistler's signature
The Whistler on November 16, 2006 at 11:20 am
Avatar for Puzzlefeet

Actually, no Whistler, that is not correct.  Take alook at the quarterly report and scroll all the way to the bottom and you can get a feel for the cost of all senior services in ND.  Now again, the feds pay a portion through medicaid, FMAP (but there is a match) etc.. but this at least gives you a peek:  http://www.nd.gov/humanservices/info/pubs/docs/qtrly-budget-insight-july03-june05.pdf.

The point in my school response was to r108 and his statement that declining enrollments and more education money for those schools meant failing schools. I said he was wrong and he is wrong on that.

Puzzlefeet on November 16, 2006 at 11:49 am

Thanks for the link puzzled.  So long-term care amounts to $358 million for the biennium.  Medical assistance which wouldn’t be just for seniors was $370 million.

That’s a more believable number.


What’s going to happen to US industry when the global warming extremists like John McCain double the price of electricity?  I would think all these factories will close and set up in countries where they aren’t scared of technology.


The Whistler's signature
The Whistler on November 16, 2006 at 11:58 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses. Confirm your email address here.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.