Home (Post) Mobile Authors Say Anything Register Login

Monday, April 07, 2008

The Real Meaning of “Uncle Tom”

By Bruce Walker


Who’s an Uncle Tom?

As the Democrats’ nomination process descends into the ugly area of racial politics, it may be helpful to explore and to learn about the origin of some of the equally ugly racial mockeries that have become a part of American political life. The term “Uncle Tom” was used extensively during the decade of civil rights reform to describe a black man who simply did what white people wanted. Where did this term come from?

The literary reference, of course, comes from Harriet Beecher Stowe’s Uncle Tom’s Cabin, the passionate and simple anti-slavery novel published before the Civil War. The pejorative term comes out of the decade of Reconstruction. While the Union Army remained in the South, blacks were allowed to participate in state and federal elections. But they could not do that alone. The support of white Republicans was essential .

There has been much written about the horrors of Reconstruction, of illiterate blacks being elected to state legislatures, and the need to withdraw Union troops to bring peace. Unfortunately, that history is largely false. The blacks who could not read were blacks who could not read because slave owners had made it an actual crime to teach blacks to read. Many black leaders in the South came from the North and had excellent college educations. Some had the same electrifying eloquence of Frederick Douglass and nearly all simply wanted to live in peace and have a fair transition from slavery to liberty.

[...]

Blacks and Republicans in the South

Working together, white Republicans and black Republicans were able to elect fourteen black members of the House of Representative during Reconstruction and two blacks Senators. Significant numbers of black Republicans were also elected to state offices.

While black and white Republicans competed with white Democrats in the South for political power, the death of Lincoln caused a similar conflict in Washington. Andrew Johnson, Lincoln’s Vice President, was a Democrat and a supporter of slavery. During the 1860 Presidential Election, Johnson had supported Breckenridge, the racist Democrat candidate from the Deep South.

Almost as soon as Johnson took office, he clashed with his anti-slavery Republican cabinet. Democrat Johnson spoke of the need for “White man’s government,” and he told Governor Fletcher of Missouri: “This is a country for white men, and by God, as long as I am President, it shall be a government for white men. Everyone would, and must, admit that the white race is superior to the black.”

While Democrats in the South and in Washington were fighting to keep blacks down and Republicans were fighting to elevate blacks to full equality, the Ku Klux Klan began to terrorize Republicans as a way of breaking the political stalemate. A federal grand jury in North Carolina in 1871 found that: “The operations of the Klan were exercised in night, and were invariably directed against members of the Republican Party by warnings to leave the country, by whippings and by murder.”[7]

Whites as well as blacks were victims of Klan violence and Klan terrorism, but the only whites who were terrorized by the Klan during this period were Republicans and, to a large extent, blacks who were Republicans were terrorized by the Klan rather than blacks who were Democrats. Why was the Klan, the terrorist arm of the Democrat Party, so intent upon wiping out the Republican Party in the South?

Contrary to what many people think now, the South had a very vigorous two party system in the years following the Civil War. Democrats and Republicans had rough parity in political power. I have studied the congressional election returns from the South during this period: elections were often won by very close margins. As long as black and white Republicans could stand together, Democrats could never establish the sort of one-party state necessary to enact Jim Crow and the utter debasement of blacks.

[...]

But there was one way to disenfranchise blacks: Turn the South into a region in which only the Democratic Party held any political power at all. This is why the Ku Klux Klan focused on the extinction of the Republican Party so much. Blacks could have whatever theoretical rights Washington and Republicans wanted to give them, but if the South was a one-party state and that one party of the Democrat Party, it did not matter.

[...]

And it worked. There was a vigorous two party system in the South in 1876, but by 1896 there were hardly any Republicans elected to any state or federal offices at all. Why? Republican whites left the South and Republican blacks joined the Democrat Party instead. Many black men, supported by strong black women who could not vote but who could speak, resisted as long as they could, but when medical care for their families and purchasing supplies at stores was even denied to them, they relented. Black women had a name for men who quit the Republican Party and became Democrats - this process was known as “Crossing the Jordan” - and that name was “Uncle Tom.”

Will we ever reach a time when Dixiecrat politicians like Bill Clinton cease to own black voters? Perhaps we will, if enough people know the truth about the history of Uncle Tom. Perhaps then Democrats will lose their stranglehold on black America and blacks will begin to see that the party founded to make them free is their friend.


Read the whole thing. As I have posted before, the Democrat Party is the historical reservoir of racism in this country.

Comments

Proof
Proof
11127 comments
Send a private message

the Democrat Party is the historical reservoir of racism in this country.

Reservoir? Or cesspool?



For any voter trying to choose between the two candidates for commander in chief, there is no better test than this: When American strategy in a critical theater was up for grabs, John McCain proposed a highly unpopular and risky path, which he accurately predicted could lead to success. Barack Obama proposed a popular and politically safe route that would have led to an unnecessary and debilitating American defeat at the hands of al Qaeda.

Frederick W. Kagan

Proof on April 7, 2008 at 12:42 pm

Reservoir? Or cesspool?

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.


Media uncovers more Palin stories in one weekend than Obama stories in two years. Still no bias detected

Obama: more experienced than Bristol Palin

robert108 on April 7, 2008 at 01:10 pm
Proof
Proof
11127 comments
Send a private message

...or the beer holder!



For any voter trying to choose between the two candidates for commander in chief, there is no better test than this: When American strategy in a critical theater was up for grabs, John McCain proposed a highly unpopular and risky path, which he accurately predicted could lead to success. Barack Obama proposed a popular and politically safe route that would have led to an unnecessary and debilitating American defeat at the hands of al Qaeda.

Frederick W. Kagan

Proof on April 7, 2008 at 01:59 pm

Open your eyes.
It’s 2008 not 1878.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

Reagan , Lott, Thurmon, Goldwater, Burns & Allen.

Many elected Black Republicans serving?

WOOF on April 7, 2008 at 02:07 pm

Woof: Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it; that is a message to you lefties.
You keep playing the race card for political purposes, just like the Dems have always done.  Get over your racism!


Media uncovers more Palin stories in one weekend than Obama stories in two years. Still no bias detected

Obama: more experienced than Bristol Palin

robert108 on April 7, 2008 at 02:16 pm
Avatar for HG

Many elected Black Republicans serving?

How utterly pathetic.  So what, whoever has the most blacks wins Woof?  Does thier politics, record, experience, and character matter at all? 

That is a rather offensive question Woof.

HG on April 7, 2008 at 02:19 pm
Proof
Proof
11127 comments
Send a private message

WOOF: No mention of your favorite racist Democrat, Robert KKK Byrd ?



For any voter trying to choose between the two candidates for commander in chief, there is no better test than this: When American strategy in a critical theater was up for grabs, John McCain proposed a highly unpopular and risky path, which he accurately predicted could lead to success. Barack Obama proposed a popular and politically safe route that would have led to an unnecessary and debilitating American defeat at the hands of al Qaeda.

Frederick W. Kagan

Proof on April 7, 2008 at 02:27 pm

You know history RBot.
You know the racist southern Democrats became dixiecrats and
then Republicans.

No

whoever has the most blacks wins Woof?

Why are their no Black Federal republican office holders?

WOOF on April 7, 2008 at 02:28 pm
Avatar for HG

Why are their no Black Federal republican office holders?

Because they lost their elections maybe?  Go back and look it up Woof.

HG on April 7, 2008 at 02:31 pm
Proof
Proof
11127 comments
Send a private message

Why are their no Black Federal republican office holders?

Secretary of State isn’t a Federal office?


For any voter trying to choose between the two candidates for commander in chief, there is no better test than this: When American strategy in a critical theater was up for grabs, John McCain proposed a highly unpopular and risky path, which he accurately predicted could lead to success. Barack Obama proposed a popular and politically safe route that would have led to an unnecessary and debilitating American defeat at the hands of al Qaeda.

Frederick W. Kagan

Proof on April 7, 2008 at 02:31 pm
Proof
Proof
11127 comments
Send a private message

Supreme Court justice isn’t a federal office?



For any voter trying to choose between the two candidates for commander in chief, there is no better test than this: When American strategy in a critical theater was up for grabs, John McCain proposed a highly unpopular and risky path, which he accurately predicted could lead to success. Barack Obama proposed a popular and politically safe route that would have led to an unnecessary and debilitating American defeat at the hands of al Qaeda.

Frederick W. Kagan

Proof on April 7, 2008 at 02:32 pm
Proof
Proof
11127 comments
Send a private message

Or are you talking about federal elected offices where the benevolent Democrats will gladly Mau Mau any conservative black who dares run?



For any voter trying to choose between the two candidates for commander in chief, there is no better test than this: When American strategy in a critical theater was up for grabs, John McCain proposed a highly unpopular and risky path, which he accurately predicted could lead to success. Barack Obama proposed a popular and politically safe route that would have led to an unnecessary and debilitating American defeat at the hands of al Qaeda.

Frederick W. Kagan

Proof on April 7, 2008 at 02:35 pm

You know the racist southern Democrats became dixiecrats and then Republicans.

Another leftie lie; those that became Republicans did so because they abandoned the traditional racism of the Dem Party.  The KKK, segregation, Jim Crow and “separate but equal” were all Dem Party platform planks.


Media uncovers more Palin stories in one weekend than Obama stories in two years. Still no bias detected

Obama: more experienced than Bristol Palin

robert108 on April 7, 2008 at 02:38 pm

robert108:  Tell woof and other fools to visit http://www.nationalblackrepublicans.com.


"Here lies, in honored glory, an American soldier, known but to God.”

“As a conservative, I will not be overly enthusiastic about voting for John McCain on November 4 - but I will be sprinting to the polling place to do so!”
Matthew May, conservative commentator, The American Spectator

pparets on April 7, 2008 at 02:50 pm
Avatar for HG

Woof,

The color of a individual’s skin has no bearing on my vote one way or the other.  The individual’s committment to liberty is what I and the vast majority of republicans look for when casting a vote in any election.  That your party obsesses about gender and race to the point of making it a qualification for office is regrettable.

HG on April 7, 2008 at 02:52 pm

robert108, thanks agin for the factual review of history.  Samantha and WataShiwa may be interested in learning some of these perverted and misappropriated words and meanings.  Reminds me of the original use of Willie Horton-- Al Gore.  As well as Mr. Gore, Sr, Faubus from AK who was Bill’s mentor.


Communism is evil

Chief RZ on April 7, 2008 at 02:52 pm

Before we get too far afield in the leftie attempts at distraction, the simple truth is that the Dems use “Uncle Tom” to describe blacks that see the light and become Republican, when the original definition of the word was exactly the opposite: black men who knuckled under to Dem terrorism in the South and became Dems.
It’s ironic to the extreme, IMO.


Media uncovers more Palin stories in one weekend than Obama stories in two years. Still no bias detected

Obama: more experienced than Bristol Palin

robert108 on April 7, 2008 at 02:55 pm

That is a rather offensive question Woof.

It’s the typical leftie “quota” approach to the problem of racism: more racism.


Media uncovers more Palin stories in one weekend than Obama stories in two years. Still no bias detected

Obama: more experienced than Bristol Palin

robert108 on April 7, 2008 at 02:57 pm
Avatar for HG

And a good point it is R108.  Redefining key terms is common liberal deception.

HG on April 7, 2008 at 03:02 pm

You know history RBot.
You know the racist southern Democrats became dixiecrats and
then Republicans.

Actually, this too is a myth. After the dixiecrats broke away from the Democrats and failed miserably as a party, all but one notable member immediately folded back into the Democratic party. With the exception of Strom Thurmond, who slowly transitioned not only to teh Republican party, but to conservative ideals, all notable members went right back to being Democrats. Why wouldn’t they? They were slightly to the left of Democrats, and the Republicans were seen as their antithesis. Russell Long, Sam Erwin, John McClellen, and yes ROBERT BYRD (not to mention Al Gore’s father) were not only Democrats again, but respected members of the party. While Thurmond is universally villified for his position of opposition to federal overreaching...Byrd and his ilk are given a pass on their blatant racism.

The truth is not kind to Democrats.

Why are their no Black Federal republican office holders?

First black Secretary of State was under a republican. First black Supreme Court Judge? A republican. First Hispanic attorney general? Republican.

As for black republicans: one only has to look at the treatment of Michael Steele (people threw oreos at him). Black Republicans face more bile than anyone else in the political arena.

condoleezza rice house nigger: 78,000 hits.
condoleezza rice house slave: 659,000 hits
colin powell uncle tom: 755,000 hits
larry elder house boy: 1,690,000 hits
cosby race traitor: 93,900 hits
cosby uncle tom: 815,000
michael steele uncle tom: 792,000
republican sambo: 192,000
republican houseboy: 31,800,000 hits

That’s all off yahoo. While a lot of links are to republican sites, they’re all talking about smears made against black republicans. On the other hand, “nigger obama” brings up links to Reverand White and Michelle Obama speeches. While the first two links are obamanigger.com (there’s no site if you click on it), and niggerobama.com (a site devoted to the hatred of obama, and reletively tame for the name) message board...the rest are devoted to things that the campaign has said. Search any racial term with a republican, and you’ll find vile hate....use it on google or yahoo with a liberal and you’ll either find things they said, or liberal race baiting ("Hillary aint never been called no nigger!")

Truth is to Democrats what water is to the wicked witch of the west.


Obama/Biden is not change. It’s more of the same.

Kenny on April 7, 2008 at 03:14 pm

Lee Atwater (Reagan and Bush senior’s chief political strategist) in a 1981 interview explaining the evolution of the G.O.P.’s Southern strategy

:

‘’You start out in 1954 by saying, ‘Nigger, nigger, nigger.’ By 1968 you can’t say ‘nigger’—that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states’ rights and all that stuff. You’re getting so abstract now [that] you’re talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you’re talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is [that] blacks get hurt worse than whites.

WOOF on April 7, 2008 at 03:50 pm

Sounds he was describing the Dem strategy for exploiting the race card.  You lie, as usual.  Nice cherry-pick, though.


Media uncovers more Palin stories in one weekend than Obama stories in two years. Still no bias detected

Obama: more experienced than Bristol Palin

robert108 on April 7, 2008 at 04:56 pm

Wow, Woof, one quote, which was in response to a question about Reagan’s policies striking a chord with racists:

http://www.answers.com/topic/lee-atwater?cat=entertainment

Atwater: As to the whole Southern strategy that Harry Dent and others put together in 1968, opposition to the Voting Rights Act would have been a central part of keeping the South. Now [the new Southern Strategy of Ronald Reagan] doesn’t have to do that. All you have to do to keep the South is for Reagan to run in place on the issues he’s campaigned on since 1964… and that’s fiscal conservatism, balancing the budget, cut taxes, you know, the whole cluster…

Questioner: But the fact is, isn’t it, that Reagan does get to the Wallace voter and to the racist side of the Wallace voter by doing away with legal services, by cutting down on food stamps…?
Atwater: You start out in 1954 by saying, ‘Nigger, nigger, nigger.’ By 1968 you can’t say ‘nigger’ - that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states’ rights and all that stuff. You’re getting so abstract now [that] you’re talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you’re talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is [that] blacks get hurt worse than whites.
And subconsciously maybe that is part of it. I’m not saying that. But I’m saying that if it is getting that abstract, and that coded, that we are doing away with the racial problem one way or the other. You follow me - because obviously sitting around saying, ‘We want to cut this,’ is much more abstract than even the busing thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract than ‘Nigger, nigger.’ [4][5][6]

That’s awkward as hell anyways, but it’s clear that he’s distinguishing Reagan’s strategy from the original southern strategy. And he says that “while racism may have had a part in it...he doesn’t really think the original southern strategy was racist at all.”

So he responds to a question about whether it’s racist by pointing out the change in racist attitudes. Woooo, you got us there. All conservatives are racistzors! You proooveded itadoodle!

Moron.


Obama/Biden is not change. It’s more of the same.

Kenny on April 7, 2008 at 05:04 pm

Compare that to the historical voting record, and all the nasty comments from Democrats, not to mention the KKK, segregation, Jim Crow, etc.

Nope, one very lame comment trumps all that.


Obama/Biden is not change. It’s more of the same.

Kenny on April 7, 2008 at 05:08 pm
Proof
Proof
11127 comments
Send a private message

Is anyone surprised that WOOF would take a quote out of context and misrepresent it?

Anyone? Anyone at all? Bueller? Bueller?



For any voter trying to choose between the two candidates for commander in chief, there is no better test than this: When American strategy in a critical theater was up for grabs, John McCain proposed a highly unpopular and risky path, which he accurately predicted could lead to success. Barack Obama proposed a popular and politically safe route that would have led to an unnecessary and debilitating American defeat at the hands of al Qaeda.

Frederick W. Kagan

Proof on April 7, 2008 at 05:12 pm

It’s clear that the Dems originally won the South by using the KKK as a terrorist organization to drive out the Republicans, and that worked until conservatives appealed to the fiscal conservatism of the South, while staying firmly anti-racist, and now the South is solidly Republican.  On the other hand, the race-card politics of the Dems gets 90%+ support in the black community.  You figure it out.


Media uncovers more Palin stories in one weekend than Obama stories in two years. Still no bias detected

Obama: more experienced than Bristol Palin

robert108 on April 7, 2008 at 05:27 pm

You don’t say Nigger, nigger , Reagan says States Rights.

distinguishing Reagan’s strategy from the original

conservatives appealed to the fiscal conservatism of the South

WOOF on April 7, 2008 at 06:03 pm

It’s always the liberals that use the “n” word.  They’re a bunch of racists.


What’s going to happen to US industry when the global warming extremists like John McCain double the price of electricity?  I would think all these factories will close and set up in countries where they aren’t scared of technology.


The Whistler's signature
The Whistler on April 7, 2008 at 06:12 pm

This is what The Truth would reveal.  For the most part, Democrats are closet racists in one way or another.  I just heard today on the radio that race does trump gender.  I wondered how that would play out.


Communism is evil

Chief RZ on April 7, 2008 at 06:19 pm
Proof
Proof
11127 comments
Send a private message

For the most part, Democrats are closet racists in one way or another.

WOOF certainly seems to relish repeating the “N” word!



For any voter trying to choose between the two candidates for commander in chief, there is no better test than this: When American strategy in a critical theater was up for grabs, John McCain proposed a highly unpopular and risky path, which he accurately predicted could lead to success. Barack Obama proposed a popular and politically safe route that would have led to an unnecessary and debilitating American defeat at the hands of al Qaeda.

Frederick W. Kagan

Proof on April 7, 2008 at 06:24 pm

WOOF.  George Wallace said, “I will not be out niggered again.” After he lost an election in the 60s.  The segregationist were Democrats.  What do you think the “solid south” meant?  It was in reaction the the carpetbaggers and emplaced negroes in the statehouses of the Confederacy during reconstruction.
By the way, Strom was probably the only US Senator to be elected on a write-in after the Democrats refused to let him run on their ticket. —robert108, did you know that?!


Communism is evil

Chief RZ on April 7, 2008 at 06:27 pm

What station/host were you listening to when you heard that, RZ?


“If a conservative is still a republican after the last 13 years, he is blind to the fact that his party of choice has failed him utterly.” – Realitybasedbob

realitybasedbob on April 7, 2008 at 06:28 pm

conservatives appealed to the fiscal conservatism of the South

But not the racism; that’s Dem turf.  Nice cherry-pick, racist.


Media uncovers more Palin stories in one weekend than Obama stories in two years. Still no bias detected

Obama: more experienced than Bristol Palin

robert108 on April 7, 2008 at 06:30 pm

By the way, Strom was probably the only US Senator to be elected on a write-in after the Democrats refused to let him run on their ticket. —robert108, did you know that?!

Yes, Strom has been unfairly demonized by the lying lefties, precisely because he renounced their racist policies.

Chief: On the other hand, when the black guy called the gay guy a “faggot” on the set of “Grey’s Anatomy”, the black guy got fired, so go figure.


Media uncovers more Palin stories in one weekend than Obama stories in two years. Still no bias detected

Obama: more experienced than Bristol Palin

robert108 on April 7, 2008 at 06:33 pm

More important would be who said it, RBB.  I believe it was Mark Levin.  So which do you think trumps?  Race or Gender?  We chuckled in “diversity class” as the hosts danced around as we asked more and more pointed questions:  How about a handicapped black woman vs. a gay fat white guy, etc.  The liberals are constantly having to define who holds the trump card ever since the late 60’s/early 70’s.  You should read Bernard Goldberg’s Arrogance sometime.  He worked for one of the big three old TV networks for about 28 years.


Communism is evil

Chief RZ on April 7, 2008 at 06:35 pm

robert108, so homosexuals still hold the trump card?  Well, they do have some money in the entertainment industry.  Remember Andy Warholl?


Communism is evil

Chief RZ on April 7, 2008 at 06:39 pm

When Strom ran for President his slogan was “Segregation Forever”

Strom has been unfairly demonized by the lying lefties, precisely because he renounced their racist policies.

He was a closet miscegenist.

Can’t help themselves.
William Bennett, prominent conservative commentator and former Education Secretary in the Reagan administration

on his “Morning in America” show, “But I do know that it’s true that if you wanted to reduce crime, you could, if that were your sole purpose, you could abort every black baby in this country, and your crime rate would go down”. He added that this would be “an impossible, ridiculous and morally reprehensible thing to do, but your crime rate would go down.”

I don’t care how white your sheets are, nobody, no party, no country is pure.

WOOF on April 7, 2008 at 06:48 pm

RBB:

What station/host were you listening to when you heard that, RZ?

RZ:

More important would be who said it, RBB.

Levin is an automatic disqualification.
Sorry, I don’t make the rules.

But on to your question.
Neither of the two trumps each other.


“If a conservative is still a republican after the last 13 years, he is blind to the fact that his party of choice has failed him utterly.” – Realitybasedbob

realitybasedbob on April 7, 2008 at 06:50 pm

You don’t say Nigger, nigger , Reagan says States Rights.

Except that’s not what he said. He distinquished Reagan from Nixon, and rejected teh idea that racism was part of the southern strategy. And this was in response to a question that was basically “Is this racist?”
While admittedly sloppy, and a little hard to follow, it was not saying that Reagan was a racist. I gave you the good grace once, cause I knew you’d never heard anything more than the one paragraph. Now you have the whole thing, and you’re still a shameless liar. Pathetic.

When Strom ran for President his slogan was “Segregation Forever”

Which he then rejected later.

He was a closet miscegenist.

Proof? None you say? Thought not.

Can’t help themselves.
William Bennett, prominent conservative commentator and former Education Secretary in the Reagan administration

Liberal argument from the book Freakanomics. And if we look at statistics, absolutely true. He also says that doing this would be abhorant. Black people have a higher rate of criminals than any other race in America. That doesn’t make it right to kill all black children. You REALLY are an idiot.

I don’t care how white your sheets are, nobody, no party, no country is pure.

Having the history of being the party that has fought racism at every turn certainly trumps being the party that supported racism at every turn.


Obama/Biden is not change. It’s more of the same.

Kenny on April 7, 2008 at 07:09 pm
Proof
Proof
11127 comments
Send a private message

Sorry, I don’t make the rules.

Or sense, so what else is new?



For any voter trying to choose between the two candidates for commander in chief, there is no better test than this: When American strategy in a critical theater was up for grabs, John McCain proposed a highly unpopular and risky path, which he accurately predicted could lead to success. Barack Obama proposed a popular and politically safe route that would have led to an unnecessary and debilitating American defeat at the hands of al Qaeda.

Frederick W. Kagan

Proof on April 7, 2008 at 07:15 pm

Glad to know there are some disqualifiers.  I have a few myself, but still listen to them.  When they say something without backing it up with The Truth or facts, I then reject their ideas.  A person who rejects out of hand anyone is prejudiced.
Noam Chomsky would be an example of one who’s ideas have been refuted by many, including hooter girls!  Guys, I see what you mean.  I think I now have three people who are just about incapable of an adult conversation.


Communism is evil

Chief RZ on April 7, 2008 at 07:36 pm

Those people wearing white sheets were Dems, and Dem terrorists at that.


Media uncovers more Palin stories in one weekend than Obama stories in two years. Still no bias detected

Obama: more experienced than Bristol Palin

robert108 on April 7, 2008 at 08:23 pm

More important would be who said it, RBB.

Nope.  The only thing that’s important is whether or not it’s true.


Media uncovers more Palin stories in one weekend than Obama stories in two years. Still no bias detected

Obama: more experienced than Bristol Palin

robert108 on April 7, 2008 at 08:24 pm

Kenny:

Having the history of being the party that has fought racism at every turn certainly trumps being the party that supported racism at every turn.

Including now.  WOOF is still using racism to try and further his party’s cause.

Good job, racist.

Carrick on April 7, 2008 at 08:31 pm

Once again, Daniel Patrick Moynihan is proven correct.  Racism in America is not so serious a problem in this country that it requires a national “conversation” to address the issue.


“Poverty of goods is easily cured; poverty of the mind is irreparable.”

Bat One on April 7, 2008 at 08:50 pm

My bad!  Apologies for the redundancy.


“Poverty of goods is easily cured; poverty of the mind is irreparable.”

Bat One on April 7, 2008 at 09:03 pm

Re: Uncle Tom
2137030570103314901S200x200Q85.jpg
The Left reserve a special kind of hatred for Blacks who leave the plantation and go Republican.


...for great justice

egpzpj.jpg

Move_Zig on April 8, 2008 at 08:51 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses. Confirm your email address here.