Home (Post) Mobile Authors Say Anything Register Login

Friday, March 07, 2008

Study: Daylight Saving Time Actually Raises Utility Bills

From Yahoo Tech:

It’s official: Daylight Saving Time is a bust. Designed (and recently extended) as a measure to save energy in a period of inflated electricity prices, an in-depth University of California study has now shown that DST doesn’t save anyone any money at all. In fact, it’s costing consumers extra, to the tune of $3.19 in extra utility bills per year.

The study was made possible because of the peculiarities of the state of Indiana, which was only partially on DST until 2006. When the whole state finally went DST (to sync with the national business day), some comparisons vs. the prior method were made apparent. The study calculated that the shift costs Indiana residents an extra $8.6 million in electricity bills in total.

Why? Shouldn’t they be, well, saving daylight—and burning fewer light bulbs?

They are, said the study. But while lighting bills were reduced, air-conditioning units had to run more often, because people were home on hot afternoons when they’d otherwise be still at the office. Heaters had to be run on cool mornings, too, when people got up and it was still dark outside.

Professor Matthew Kotchen, who pioneered the study, noted, “I’ve never had a paper with such a clear and unambiguous finding as this.”

This isn’t the first time the energy-saving rationale of Daylight Saving Time has been attacked. The first was in 1976, three years after DST went into effect, when the National Bureau of Standards found that there was no significant energy savings after the switch. The recent expansion of DST to a few extra weeks was also revealed to have saved no energy during its run. And yet here we are…

In related news, it was also revealed that Daylight Saving Time actually creates no additional daylight.

Now that we know, can we finally get rid of this nonsense? It steals an hour of evening light during the winter, doesn’t reduce energy costs, and actually costs the US more! What kind of sense does that make?

Comments

It steals an hour of evening light during the winter, doesn’t reduce energy costs, and actually costs the US more!

Stealing an hour of evening light in the winter is moving from Daylight Savings time to Standard time.

On the other hand DST would get you home with more evening light but very well could cause more energy costs.

My preference would be to stay on DST all year so that we have more light on winter afternoons.


What’s going to happen to US industry when the global warming extremists like John McCain double the price of electricity?  I would think all these factories will close and set up in countries where they aren’t scared of technology.


The Whistler's signature
The Whistler on March 7, 2008 at 12:11 pm

Ah, I guess I had where the light went backwards.  Even so, it just doesn’t make sense to keep going back and forth twice a year.  Let’s just choose one and stay with it.  Personally, I like having it light longer in the evening than earlier in the morning, but I suppose that would be a source of debate if they actually decided to get rid of it.

Paul on March 7, 2008 at 03:13 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses. Confirm your email address here.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.