Home (Post) Mobile Authors Say Anything Register Login

Wednesday, February 07, 2007

Some Arguments For Legalizing Marijuana

First off, let me start this by stating a simple fact:

The much touted “war on drugs” isn’t working. Never has. Never will. We spend billions of dollars each year enforcing our drug laws but marijuana still continues to pour across our borders by the truck load. And as we speak it is right now the country’s largest cash crop, easily eclipsing corn or wheat.

We put people in prison at a rate very few countries in the world match and many, many of them are there for simple drug offenses. A sad fact is that I will most likely do less jail time for hitting you in the head with a hammer than I will for selling an ounce of marijuana. Our priorities in things like this have become totally skewed.

And, no, no, I’m not endorsing the dealing of any drug, up to and including marijuana. We’re our own worst enemy when it comes to this, though. By keeping marijuana illegal we empower and enrich the dealers who smuggle and/or grow the stuff. Dealing large quantities of any drug is a high stakes game. Just this week two police stations in Aculpulco, Mexico were raided by dealers and policemen were killed. If profits are threatened in this deadly game somebody gets killed.

We can take that power away from those dealers. How? We have to re-think our strategy. And here is one possible answer.

First off the legalization of marijuana should be a state’s-rights issue. The federal government should butt out and leave it up to individual states whether or not marijuana should be a criminal offense.

Second off posession of a reasonable amount of marijuana should be decriminalized if not legalized. What’s reasonable? Each state could set those parameters by deciding the quantity that can qualify as “personal use”.

Third, it should be legal to cultivate your own marijuana, again with individual quantity limits in mind.

And, fourth, up the penalties for dealing. Make it just not worth it.

Would this not cut the dealers completely out of the loop? With no profit to consider wouldn’t that part of the drug world’s business dry up along with the accompanying violence and death?

Drugs are not going to go away simply because they are illegal. And more draconian laws aren't the answer. In countries such as China drug dealing is a capital offense. They still do it. Like Dennis Miller once said, if all drugs were to disappear people would go outside and spin around and around until they fell down.

We just need to re-think this whole thing, as I said. Is it a perfect answer? Probably not, but something, anything is better than the status quo. I’m tired of all the death and violence and the disruption of lives our “war on drugs” causes. Anybody have any other ideas?

Comments

Pilgrim,

Dennis Miller’s glib repartee is hardly the basis for a serious policy discussion such as you propose here.

That said, I would be willing to entertain your suggested revisions, so long as you would willing to indemnify the taxpayers who have so far borne the burden of most rehabilitation costs.  Remove drug use/misuse and addiction from Social Security, welfare, or federal or state funded rehabilitation programs.  Similarly, remove drugs, including marijuana, from any sort of rehabilitation funding under ADA.

If you are going to de-criminalize the personal use of certain currently illicit substances, then make sure the responsibility, and consequences, rest squarely on the shoulders of those whose decision it is to use those substances in the first place, and not burden the taxpayers with the cost of those consequences.


“Poverty of goods is easily cured; poverty of the mind is irreparable.”

Bat One on February 7, 2007 at 01:16 pm
Rob
Rob
19453 comments
Send a private message

I’m with Bat.  If we are to legalize drugs and spare taxpayers the expense of the endless, futile “war on drugs” then we should also spare taxpayers the expense of caring for people who have allowed their addictions to become a handicap.


When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on February 7, 2007 at 01:27 pm

Bat:

I’m not endorsing the legalization of heroin or cocaine or any of the more devastating drugs. And I agree with you about the relationship between those programs and legalization. That being said, how many people are in alcohol rehab programs? Alcohol, a perfectly legal drug, is very destructive when abused. Yet it’s an accepted part of our culture.

Marijuana is a relatively benign drug when compared to the ones I mentioned above, including alcohol.

Why do we continue to allow people to get rich who deal the stuff on a massive scale when we could take the wind out of their sails so easily?


The future ain’t what it used to be.....

Pilgrim on February 7, 2007 at 01:42 pm

Dennis Miller’s glib repartee is hardly the basis for a serious policy discussion such as you propose here.

The repartee may be glib but the message it sends is true. I just tried to cut into the seriousness of the issue with some applicable humor. I satnd duly chastised.


The future ain’t what it used to be.....

Pilgrim on February 7, 2007 at 01:47 pm

Pilgrim,

I’m not as sanguine as you about the “relatively benign” effects of marijuana, having put a couple kids through high school.  One of the better know effects of pot is symptomatic lethargy, and it is about the last thing kids need to learn, when they should be focused on discovering and harnessing initiative, determination, and the application of sustained effort to achieve their goals.

I don’t disagree that marijuana is most likely less harmful than alcohol, though as you point out, drinking is far more socially acceptable, despite the more harmful long-term effects.

Still, my point was to get the taxpayers off the hook for the results of decisions made by knowing adults.  I should have included alcohol rehab as well.  That my tax dollars, state or federal, should pay for someone else’s rehab program is ridiculous.  The consequences of someone else’s decision to drink (or smoke pot) irresponsibly are not my concern, and I certainly shouldn’t be expected to pay for those consequences.

I’m not opposed to a substantial does of libertarianism now and then.  Just don’t expect to burden me with the consequences of others’ actions.


“Poverty of goods is easily cured; poverty of the mind is irreparable.”

Bat One on February 7, 2007 at 01:59 pm

Bat,

Your point is well taken and valid and well reasoned, as always. My point is that the current method of dealing with the drug situation isn’t working and isn’t likely to, and is causing a disproportionate amount of grief for the relief it brings us.

How else can we fix it, even this small part of it?


The future ain’t what it used to be.....

Pilgrim on February 7, 2007 at 02:06 pm

How else can we fix it, even this small part of it?

Pilgrim,

The short and honest answer is that I haven’t the faintest idea how to fix it.

And it certainly doesn’t help to realize that this is hardly the only societal problem that stems from a combination of a lack of self-discipline and an over-abundance of self-indulgence.

There!  Now, wasn’t that helpful?


“Poverty of goods is easily cured; poverty of the mind is irreparable.”

Bat One on February 7, 2007 at 02:45 pm

Legalize marijuana!

Zsa Zsa on February 7, 2007 at 03:00 pm

I think if marijuana was legalized it would be great for the farmers!

Zsa Zsa on February 7, 2007 at 03:47 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses. Confirm your email address here.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.