Home (Post) Mobile Authors Say Anything Register Login

Wednesday, August 20, 2008

Simply Amazing

From the Associated Press:

VENTURA, Calif. (AP) — The family of a gay teenager who was fatally shot in class blames the school district for allowing their son to wear makeup and feminine clothing to school — factors the family claims led to the death.
The parents and brother of 15-year-old Larry King of Oxnard filed a personal injury claim against the Hueneme school district seeking unspecified damages for not enforcing the dress code.

Chances are if the school had enforced the dress code...they would’ve been sued just like the federal government, the prisons, the army, City Halls, and even Fema.

Even if you do what they want, you can get sued by transsexuals.

It’s very much a damned if you do, damned if you don’t type of thing. If you prevent them from doing what they want, you’re discriminating against them. If they get hurt...well, why didn’t you stop them? It’s ridiculous.

Crossposted at Looking At the Left From the Left

Comments

If the school had resisted then they would have contributed to the hate filled environment that led to his murder.

Certainly we don’t know any details, but it sounds to me like the family wants to profit from their sons death.

Dirtbags.


What’s going to happen to US industry when the global warming extremists like John McCain double the price of electricity?  I would think all these factories will close and set up in countries where they aren’t scared of technology.


The Whistler's signature
The Whistler on August 21, 2008 at 04:00 am

Typical Sheehan Syndrome. Blame everyone except the actual killer


flag002.gif washC.gif Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Anna on August 21, 2008 at 07:46 am

Exactly why is it not the parents’ responsibility to tell their son that he is not going to dress like a girl?

Bike Bubba on August 21, 2008 at 08:00 am

From the Associated Press:

King, an eighth-grader at E.O. Green Junior High School, was shot in February. Classmate Brandon McInerney pleaded not guilty to the shooting last week. He was charged as an adult and also faces a charge of a committing a hate crime.

The family’s claim, filed last week in Ventura County Superior Court, said administrators and teachers failed to enforce the school’s dress code when King wore feminine clothing and makeup to school.

His parents, Dawn and Gregory King, said faculty members knew their son had “unique vulnerabilities” and was subject to abuse because of his sexual orientation.

King was a ward of the court and living at a shelter for abused, neglected and emotionally troubled children at the time of the shooting.

The really sad thing about this whole incident is the fact that the shooter, a 13 year old child, had such hatred ingrained in him against gays, that he felt it necessary to kill King. I wonder about the influences in his life.

ollie-B on August 21, 2008 at 08:41 am

Missed in this also is the question, where the hell did a 13 year old get a gun to bring to school?

sanity on August 21, 2008 at 09:07 am

OK, why is it (again) not the responsibility of the guardians to make sure a child is dressed appropriately to go to school? 

There is also a question of why the child was a “ward of the state.” This could possibly (not definitely, though) indicate that we’re not exactly talking about the Parents of the Year.

For, as sanity notes, either the victim’s parents or the killer’s parents.

Bike Bubba on August 21, 2008 at 09:12 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses. Confirm your email address here.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.