Home (Post) Mobile Authors Say Anything Register Login

Sunday, November 18, 2007

Shattering Conventional Wisdom About Saddam’s WMD’s

John Loftus

Finally, there are some definitive answers to the mystery of the missing WMD. Civilian volunteers, mostly retired intelligence officers belonging to the non-partisan IntelligenceSummit.org, have been poring over the secret archives captured from Saddam Hussein. The inescapable conclusion is this: Saddam really did have WMD after all, but not in the way the Bush administration believed. A 9,000 word research paper with citations to each captured document has been posted online at LoftusReport.com, along with translations of the captured Iraqi documents, courtesy of Mr. Ryan Mauro and his friends.

This Iraqi document research has been supplemented with satellite photographs and dozens of interviews, among them David Gaubatz who risked radiation exposure to locate Saddam’s underwater WMD warehouses , and John Shaw, whose brilliant detective work solved the puzzle of where the WMD went. Both have contributed substantially to solving one of the most difficult mysteries of our decade.

The absolutists on either side of the WMD debate will be more than a bit chagrinned at these disclosures. The documents show a much more complex history than previously suspected. The “Bush lied, people died” chorus has insisted that Saddam had no WMD whatsoever after 1991 - and thus that WMD was no good reason for the war. The Neocon diehards insist that, as in Raiders of the Lost Ark, the treasure-trove is still out there somewhere, buried under the sand dunes of Iraq. Each side is more than a little bit wrong about Saddam’s WMD, and each side is only a little bit right about what happened to it.

The gist of the new evidence is this: roughly one quarter of Saddam’s WMD was destroyed under UN pressure during the early to mid 1990’s. Saddam sold approximately another quarter of his weapons stockpile to his Arab neighbors during the mid to late 1990’s. The Russians insisted on removing another quarter in the last few months before the war. The last remaining WMD, the contents of Saddam’s nuclear weapons labs, were still inside Iraq on the day when the coalition forces arrived in 2003. His nuclear weapons equipment was hidden in enormous underwater warehouses beneath the Euphrates River. Saddam’s entire nuclear inventory was later stolen from these warehouses right out from under the Americans’ noses. The theft of the unguarded Iraqi nuclear stockpile is perhaps, the worst scandal of the war, suggesting a level of extreme incompetence and gross dereliction of duty that makes the Hurricane Katrina debacle look like a model of efficiency.

Without pointing fingers at the Americans, the Israeli government now believes that Saddam Hussein’s nuclear stockpiles have ended up in weapons dumps in Syria. Debkafile, a somewhat reliable private Israeli intelligence service, has recently published a report claiming that the Syrians were importing North Korean plutonium to be mixed with Saddam’s enriched uranium. Allegedly, the Syrians were close to completing a warhead factory next to Saddam’s WMD dump in Deir al Zour, Syria to produce hundreds, if not thousands, of super toxic “dirty bombs” that would pollute wherever they landed in Israel for the next several thousands of years. Debka alleged that it was this combination factory/WMD dump site which was the target of the recent Israeli air strike in Deir al Zour province..

[...]

Saddam’s nuclear documents compel any reasonable person to the conclusion that, more probably than not, there were in fact nuclear WMD sites, components, and programs hidden inside Iraq at the time the Coalition forces invaded. In view of these newly discovered documents, it can be concluded, more probably than not, that Saddam did have a nuclear weapons program in 2001-2002, and that it is reasonably certain that he would have continued his efforts towards making a nuclear bomb in 2003 had he not been stopped by the Coalition forces. Four years after the war began, we still do not have all the answers, but we have many of them. Ninety percent of the Saddam files have never been read, let alone translated. It is time to utterly reject the conventional wisdom that there were no WMD in Iraq and look to the best evidence: Saddam’s own files on WMD. The truth is what it is, the documents speak for themselves.

An interesting read.  The good news is that Saddam really did have the WMD; the bad news is that the Administration didn’t have it exactly right, which gives the opposition plenty of room to lie and spin the information to give a negative impression, which is all they care about.

Comments

show the WMD or shut the eff up. we do not believe privately affiliatd ‘retired intelligence officers’. nice post, btw.


Yun Chu said, “You must strictly not express in words what is very significant. Both dragon and snake are killed in one blow.”

Sparkie Arbuckle on November 19, 2007 at 05:32 am

Three words, dual use technology.

Yes, you are absolutely right! Ignore the thousands of binary artillery and rocket rounds, the hundreds of aerial dispersal tank systems, the thousands upon thousands of drums of chem agent ingredients stored hundreds of miles away from industrial and water treatment plants. Yea, all that means nothing.

And the nuclear program in Iran is for power generation, even though there are no transmission lines running from it. Keep telling yourself whatever you need to make it through the night, babe.


Una Salus Victus Nullam Sperare Salutem

2Hotel9 on November 19, 2007 at 06:06 am

Had I been President, I would have made translating the Saddam documents first priority, but then I have no doubts about the dangers of Islamic terrorism, and haven’t since 1972.


"Give the lefties a pile of money, and they’ll spend it buying votes.” - Rush Limbaugh on the “bailout”.

robert108 on November 19, 2007 at 08:17 am

Saddam didn’t need WMD’s. He was enough of a WMD himself. If you don’t believe this report there is no denying Saddam was a threat to anyone near him.
Robert108… Liberals will deny and slam the USA for it’s decision to invade Iraq no matter what evidence is presented. They might as well go join the taliban. The liberal Congress is a terrorist’s greatest hope and dream!

Zsa Zsa on November 19, 2007 at 08:30 am

ZZ: Well said!


"Give the lefties a pile of money, and they’ll spend it buying votes.” - Rush Limbaugh on the “bailout”.

robert108 on November 19, 2007 at 08:44 am

Robert108… What is sad is that anyone would ever have to say that. BUT it is true. When I see individuals bash the USA and then say they “SUPPORT the Troops” it makes me ill. They really mean the Taliban troops.

Zsa Zsa on November 19, 2007 at 09:03 am

Actually, they are just lying.


"Give the lefties a pile of money, and they’ll spend it buying votes.” - Rush Limbaugh on the “bailout”.

robert108 on November 19, 2007 at 09:12 am

IRAQ WAR FAUCETS

On the pretense of a nuclear threat, President Bush illegally turned on two faucets - full force: out of one flows the American People’s precious tax revenues, and out of the other flows their priceless blood.

This is a black mark on his name that can never be erased – to damn him in history.

Jeugenen on November 19, 2007 at 11:15 am

Jeugenen - are you a real person or are you an automated spam bot?

Let’s see if you respond.

likwidshoe on November 19, 2007 at 11:43 am

Lik: I never thought I would suggest it about anyone, but I wish these people posting these Paulite political speeches could be blocked. I don’t want to ever chill free speech or stopr even good or even angry arguments, but this is really getting annoying and I know others here are getting tired of it. Quite frankly, I am very unhappy about how people can misuse the internet like this to cause problems for other people, or to add spyware, addware or viruses, they must have diseased minds, some criminal minds.


No matter the age or state of health, for a military man it is always glorious to tilt at windmills, rescue a fair Dulcinea and be a gallant knight in armor in a glorious cause.

Neiman on November 19, 2007 at 11:49 am

Nman, it is only free speech when it is an actual person doing it. This “jeugenen” is not. It has been dropping these incoherent turds into threads here and else where, and gives zero responsive comments. I thought one Saturday was a real comment, then saw the exact same one elsewhere. I believe it has been smacked over in the Rot’s kingdom and Ace’s AO in the last few days. I’ll ask the SargentMajor about it if I see him active in threads.


Una Salus Victus Nullam Sperare Salutem

2Hotel9 on November 19, 2007 at 03:20 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses. Confirm your email address here.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.