Home (Post) ND News Mobile Say Anything Forum Contact Register Login

Thursday, November 20, 2008


SCOTUS To Review Lord Obama’s Citizenship

A case that challenges President-elect Barack Obama’s name on the 2008 election ballot citing questions over his citizenship has been scheduled for a “conference” at the U.S. Supreme Court.

Conferences are private meetings of the justices at which they review cases and decide which ones to accept for formal review. This case is set for a conference Dec. 5, just 10 days before the Electoral College is scheduled to meet to make formal the election of Obama as the nation’s next president.

The Supreme Court’s website listed the date for the case brought by Leo C. Donofrio against Nina Wells, the secretary of state in New Jersey, over not only Obama’s name on the 2008 election ballot but those of two others, Sen. John McCain and Roger Calero.

The disputes all cite “natural-born citizen” requirement set by the U.S. Constitution.

The biggest question is why Obama, if a Hawaii birth certificate exists as his campaign has stated, simply hasn’t ordered it made available to settle the rumors.

The governor’s office in Hawaii said there is a valid certificate but rejected requests for access and left ambiguous its origin: Does the certificate on file with the Department of Health indicate a Hawaii birth or was it generated after the Obama family registered a Kenyan birth in Hawaii?

Obama’s half-sister, Maya Soetoro, has named two different Hawaii hospitals where Obama could have been born. There have been other allegations that Obama actually was born in Kenya during a time when his father was a British subject.

“Should Senator Obama be discovered, after he takes office, to be ineligible for the Office of President of the United States of America and, thereby, his election declared void, Petitioners, as well as other Americans, will suffer irreparable harm in that (a) usurper will be sitting as the President of the United States, and none of the treaties, laws, or executive orders signed by him will be valid or legal,” the action challenges.

The California case states, “There is a reasonable and common expectation by the voters that to qualify for the ballot, the individuals running for office must meet minimum qualifications as outlined in the federal and state Constitutions and statutes, and that compliance with those minimum qualifications has been confirmed by the officials overseeing the election process,” the complaint said, when in fact the only documentation currently required is a signed statement from the candidate attesting to those qualifications.

“Since [the secretary of state] has, as its core, the mission of certifying and establishing the validity of the election process, this writ seeks a Court Order barring SOS from certifying the California Electors until documentary proof that Senator Obama is a ‘natural born’ citizen of the United States of America is received by her,”

I said from the first that I was concerned about the “IF” of this matter, which is why I felt it should have been settled long ago, which Lord Obama could have done easily, but so far has refused. Despite some here at SAB thinking it is too late or worrying about riots, I am concerned about a little, often hated document called the Constitution. Oh well, who cares anything about that, right?

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=81484

Does this tick you off? Click here to email your elected representatives right here on Say Anything, or comment below.

Comments

Avatar for HG

Wow.  Very interesting.  That SCOTUS would consider this lends some credibility to the action.

HG on November 20, 2008 at 11:26 am

This used to be a country based on the rule of law and following The Constitution of The United States of America, not mob rule.


Communism is evil

Chief RZ on November 20, 2008 at 11:34 am

ChiefRZ: Boy are you out of touch, mob rule is the order of the day. Juts look at the homosexual marriage mess, they are going to bully the state supreme court to reverse the will of the people, with the help of our Attorney General, as a result of verbal terrorism by homosexuals. Question Obama’s citizenship and they will threaten race riots to try and stop any legal action to find out the truth. Hell, the will of the people is even hated by Obama.


In keeping silent about evil, in burying it deep within us, so that it appears nowhere on the surface, we are implanting it, and it will rise up a thousandfold in the future.
Alexander Solzhenitsyn. The Gulag Archipelago

Neiman on November 20, 2008 at 11:42 am

Thank God Obama will bring back the rule of law.


Telling one lie or even consistently lying about one subject…doesn’t make you a liar…

robert108 on May 18, 2009 at 03:23 pm

“You have absolutely no reason, none, to trust our word or our actions at this point.”

Titular gop Head Mr. Steele


realitybasedbob's signature
realitybasedbob on November 20, 2008 at 11:44 am

Thank God Obama will bring back the rule of law.

If you realy believe that, then my prior assessment of you being a low grade moron vastly overestimated your intelligence and was a terrible insult to morons everywhere.


In keeping silent about evil, in burying it deep within us, so that it appears nowhere on the surface, we are implanting it, and it will rise up a thousandfold in the future.
Alexander Solzhenitsyn. The Gulag Archipelago

Neiman on November 20, 2008 at 11:50 am

When you engage in childish name calling it hardly gives anyone any confidence in your intellect!

Neiman on February 18, 2008 at 04:47 pm


Telling one lie or even consistently lying about one subject…doesn’t make you a liar…

robert108 on May 18, 2009 at 03:23 pm

“You have absolutely no reason, none, to trust our word or our actions at this point.”

Titular gop Head Mr. Steele


realitybasedbob's signature
realitybasedbob on November 20, 2008 at 12:04 pm

Excuse me, you were saying?

His name calling wasn’t childish, it was done soberly and thoughtfully. 

I still think Obama is yanking the chain of nutters and he’s got nothing to hide (in this particular respect.)

FlyOnTheWall on November 20, 2008 at 12:10 pm

You might be right. His name calling is boorish.

Kudos on your chain yanking stance.


Telling one lie or even consistently lying about one subject…doesn’t make you a liar…

robert108 on May 18, 2009 at 03:23 pm

“You have absolutely no reason, none, to trust our word or our actions at this point.”

Titular gop Head Mr. Steele


realitybasedbob's signature
realitybasedbob on November 20, 2008 at 12:26 pm

You might be right. His name calling is boorish.

Kudos on your chain yanking stance.


Telling one lie or even consistently lying about one subject…doesn’t make you a liar…

robert108 on May 18, 2009 at 03:23 pm

“You have absolutely no reason, none, to trust our word or our actions at this point.”

Titular gop Head Mr. Steele


realitybasedbob's signature
realitybasedbob on November 20, 2008 at 12:26 pm

You might be right. His name calling is boorish.

Kudos on your chain yanking stance.


Telling one lie or even consistently lying about one subject…doesn’t make you a liar…

robert108 on May 18, 2009 at 03:23 pm

“You have absolutely no reason, none, to trust our word or our actions at this point.”

Titular gop Head Mr. Steele


realitybasedbob's signature
realitybasedbob on November 20, 2008 at 12:26 pm

Wow, never press enter with a broken thumb.


Telling one lie or even consistently lying about one subject…doesn’t make you a liar…

robert108 on May 18, 2009 at 03:23 pm

“You have absolutely no reason, none, to trust our word or our actions at this point.”

Titular gop Head Mr. Steele


realitybasedbob's signature
realitybasedbob on November 20, 2008 at 12:27 pm

Wow.  Very interesting.  That SCOTUS would consider this lends some credibility to the action.

They might just be doing this to stop any further law suits…


Check out:
Goon’s North Dakota Red Neck
Goon’s World

goon on November 20, 2008 at 01:27 pm
Avatar for Ted

You gotta hear this 90 minute blogradio on why the media has a blackout of the looming Obama Birth Certificate Constitutional Crisis:

http://politicalpistachio.blogspot.com/2008/11/why-is-obamas-birth-certificate-still.html

Ted on November 20, 2008 at 07:35 pm

We have been trying to get this story out, but the MSM continually ignores anything that makes Obama look bad.

There is a big difference between the Donofrio and the Berg cases, both of which are at the Supreme Court.

Berg is trying to prove Obama was either not born in the U.S. or lost his U.S. Citizenship.  http://www.obamacrimes.com

With Donofrio’s case it doesn’t matter where Obama was born.  It just matters that his biological father was a British citizen at the time of his birth and under the rules of Britain, Obama became a British citizen when he was born.  Therefore Obama was born with foreign and or dual citizenship.  Under the Constitution if a person’s American citizship is encumbered by another citizenship he is NOT a natural born citizen.  A natural born citizen only can have allegiance to the U.S.

Obama admits that he was born with British citizenship.  See his website and factcheck.org.

See these two articles that support the Donofrio case and see his website, he explains the lawsuit very well.

http://www.blogtext.org/naturalborncitizen/

http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/07/25/divided-loyalties-pt-1/

http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/07/25/divided-loyalties-pt-2/

barnieca on November 20, 2008 at 11:01 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

If you want to ignore a fellow commenter, download this

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses. Confirm your email address here.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.