Part II-Barak, Michelle & Jerry Wright- Embittered Marxists
Tie the two together: CRT [Critical Racial Marxist Theory] & BLT [Black Liberation pretend Theology that’s really Racial Marxism], and you’ve got a recipe for disater in the U.S. if this Barak shyster actually gets elected.
Obama pledges racial harmony, and almost everyone in America of course agrees, and who cares about the few who don’t? But he also spent 20 years imbibing the Jeremiah Wright gospel that Black problems are White folks’ fault and then preaching that we need to spend billions more on what billions have already proven doesn’t work. Which makes his Bill Cosby conversion suspect at least.
who could disagree…..?
2) Hyscience
The Marxist Roots of Black Liberation Theology goes a long way toward explaining why B. Hussein Obama and his victim-wallowing wife Michelle have the far-left, Marxist, views that we see more and more everyday as BHO’s facade is gradually pulled back on the campaign trail.
Reading the following excerpts gives us an Aha.. moment, saying to ourselves, “So that’s why he expresses such a Marxist ideology in his political views and that’s what he learned in the 20 years he sat in Jeremiah Wright’s pews:
Black Liberation Theology.
who could disagree….?
The Marxist Roots of Black Liberation Theology
by Anthony B. Bradley
[...] Black Liberation Theology actually encourages a victim mentality among blacks.
John McWhorters’ book Losing the Race, will be helpful here. Victimology, says McWhorter, is the adoption of victimhood as the core of one’s identity—for example, like one who suffers through living in “a country and who lived in a culture controlled by rich white people.”
It is a subconscious, culturally inherited affirmation that life for blacks in America has been in the past and will be in the future a life of being victimized by the oppression of whites.
In today’s terms, it is the conviction that, 40 years after the Civil Rights Act, conditions for blacks have not substantially changed. As Wright intimates, for example, scores of black men regularly get passed over by cab drivers.
Reducing black identity to “victimhood” distorts the reality of true progress. For example, was Obama a victim of widespread racial oppression at the hand of “rich white people” before graduating from Columbia University, Harvard Law School magna cum laude, or after he acquired his estimated net worth of $1.3 million?
How did “rich white people” keep Obama from succeeding? If Obama is the model of an oppressed black man, I want to be oppressed next! With my graduate school debt my net worth is literally negative $52,659.
[...] McWhorter articulates three main objections to victimology: First, victimology condones weakness in failure. Victimology tacitly stamps approval on failure, lack of effort, and criminality.
Behaviors and patterns that are self-destructive are often approved of as cultural or presented as unpreventable consequences from previous systemic patterns.
Black Liberation theologians are clear on this point: “People are poor because they are victims of others,” says Dr. Dwight Hopkins, a Black Liberation theologian teaching at the University of Chicago Divinity School.
Second, victimology hampers progress because, from the outset, it focuses attention on obstacles.
For example, in Black liberation Theology, the focus is on the impediment of black freedom in light of the Goliath of white racism.
Third, victimology keeps racism alive because many whites are constantly painted as racist with no evidence provided.
Racism charges create a context for backlash and resentment fueling new attitudes among whites not previously held or articulated, and creates “separatism”—a suspension of moral judgment in the name of racial solidarity.
Does Jeremiah Wright foster separatism or racial unity and reconciliation?
[...[ One of the pillars of Obama’s home church, Trinity United Church of Christ, is “economic parity.”
On the website, Trinity claims that God is not pleased with “America’s economic mal-distribution.” Among all of controversial comments by Jeremiah Wright, the idea of massive wealth redistribution is the most alarming.
The code language “economic parity” and references to “mal-distribution” is nothing more than channeling the twisted economic views of Karl Marx.
Black Liberation theologians have explicitly stated a preference for Marxism as an ethical framework for the black church because Marxist thought is predicated on a system of oppressor class (whites) versus victim class (blacks).
Black Liberation theologians James Cone and Cornel West have worked diligently to embed Marxist thought into the black church since the 1970s.
For Cone, Marxism best addressed remedies to the condition of blacks as victims of white oppression.
In For My People, Cone explains that “the Christian faith does not possess in its nature the means for analyzing the structure of capitalism.
Marxism as a tool of social analysis can disclose the gap between appearance and reality, and thereby help Christians to see how things really are.”
In God of the Oppressed, Cone said that Marx’s chief contribution is “his disclosure of the ideological character of bourgeois thought, indicating the connections between the ‘ruling material force of society’ and the ‘ruling intellectual’ force.”
Marx’s thought is useful and attractive to Cone because it allows black theologians to critique racism in America on the basis of power and revolution.
[...] Perhaps it is the Marxism imbedded in Obama’s attendance at Trinity Church that should raise red flags. “Economic parity”
and “distribution” language implies things like government-coerced wealth redistribution, perpetual minimum wage increases, government subsidized health care for all, and the like.
One of the priorities listed on Obama’s campaign website reads, “Obama will protect tax cuts for poor and middle class families, but he will reverse most of the Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest taxpayers.”
Black Liberation Theology, originally intended to help the black community, may have actually hurt many blacks by promoting racial tension, victimology, and Marxism which ultimately leads to more oppression.
As the failed “War on Poverty” has exposed, the best way to keep the blacks perpetually enslaved to government as “daddy” is to preach victimology, Marxism, and to seduce blacks into thinking that upward mobility is someone else’s responsibility in a free society.
Read it all - here….
