Home Mobile Authors Say Anything Register Login

Wednesday, October 18, 2006

NYT makes pre-emptive worst-case strike

If the Dems fail to retake one or both sides of Congress next month, the New York Times has the early meme locked and loaded.

Via Drudge

With an unusually large number of tight races and dozens of states shifting to new electronic voting systems, election officials across the country are bracing for long lines and heightened confusion at the polls on Election Day, Nov. 7, the NEW YORK TIMES will front on Thursday.


Got it? If the Dems fail in their quest to retake Congress, it’s the fault of electronic voting machines, long lines and confusion.

A.K.A. - Karl Rove!

Update: The NYT article here.

I've cut the whole flash post below the fold because Drudge only uses his flash pages for a short time.

NYT: BE PREPARED FOR CHAOS ON ELECTION DAY; NEW MACHINES, LINES, CONFUSION
Wed Oct 18 2006 19:12:07 ET

With an unusually large number of tight races and dozens of states shifting to new electronic voting systems, election officials across the country are bracing for long lines and heightened confusion at the polls on Election Day, Nov. 7, the NEW YORK TIMES will front on Thursday.

"North Carolina, Ohio, Indiana, Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Mississippi and Missouri are among the states considered most likely to experience difficulties, according to voting experts who have been tracking the new technology and other election changes.

Developing...

Comments

Rob
Rob
17485 comments
Send a private message

Wonderful how they’re setting it up.

If Demcorats win it’s because Americans came to their senses and sent the conservatives (or, at least, the people who called themselves conservatives) packing.

If Republicans win it’s because they cheated.


When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on October 18, 2006 at 07:19 pm
Avatar for electnixon

It’s not any different than the same crap we’ve put up with all along.
‘disenfranchised’
‘disenfranchised’
‘disenfranchised’
I wonder what the new buzz word will be this year.

electnixon on October 19, 2006 at 07:43 am

Rob writes:

Wonderful how they’re setting it up. If Demcorats win it’s because Americans came to their senses and sent the conservatives (or, at least, the people who called themselves conservatives) packing. If Republicans win it’s because they cheated.

Your comment is a great example of my conjecture that 99% of “media bias” claims are the product solely of the viewer’s (or reader’s) imagination.

Dave_Comet on October 19, 2006 at 09:21 pm
Avatar for muniz

There wasn’t anything at all in that article that said anything about either side placing the blame on the machines.  Your argument could just as well be made with the republicans and demoncrats flipped. 

What the article said is that there will most likely be errors and confusion.  Regardless of victory, either side has a right to question the results of an election of those results are indeed questionable.  Duh.

muniz on October 21, 2006 at 02:29 pm
Avatar for JR Ewing

Also, be ready for discussion of Katrina victims not being able to vote.  That is going to be used a lot, accusing Bush (he’s one busy guy) of keeping evacuees from being able to vote.  Even if NO votes in only Democrats but the Republicans keep control of Congress they’ll use it as an excuse.

Remember - it doesn’t have to make sense, as long as it’s in an article.

JR Ewing on November 2, 2006 at 10:56 am
Avatar for JR Ewing

...and in response to the last two posts I just read by Dave and muniz… are you questioning that there is political bias in a majority of the media?  I can find you article after article that is written with obvious spin against Republicans or from a liberal point of view.  There are not many written from a conservative point of view. I’m not talking editorials, but articles that are represented as reporting unbiased facts and news.

One example is an article I read about an hour ago that discuss Republicans attempting to “cling to control of Congress”, while Democrats are “striving to win it back.” This portrays the author’s opinion that the Republicans are on the ropes “clinging” to hope, while the Democrats are marching victoriously. Again this wasn’t an editorial, it was “the news”.  You won’t find many, if any at all, articles that say that same something like “the Republicans look to continue their domination of Congress, while Democrats desperately scrap to gain what control they can.” If articles were written like that - for the past decade - then liberals would be saying the same things conservatives are now.

JR Ewing on November 2, 2006 at 11:31 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses. Confirm your email address here.