Home Mobile Authors Say Anything Register Login

Sunday, October 22, 2006

NY Times Admits They Should Have Not Told the Terroists About the Terrorist Financial Tracking

Well, it seems a bit late since you torpedoed a successful, legal and secret program.  I’m sure that the Terrorists networks changed their procedures know that the Terrorist Times did their research for them.
Michelle Malkin (Blogger-Babe)

Since the job of public editor requires me to probe and question the published work and wisdom of Times journalists, there’s a special responsibility for me to acknowledge my own flawed assessments.

My July 2 column strongly supported The Times’s decision to publish its June 23 article on a once-secret banking-data surveillance program. After pondering for several months, I have decided I was off base. There were reasons to publish the controversial article, but they were slightly outweighed by two factors to which I gave too little emphasis. While it’s a close call now, as it was then, I don’t think the article should have been published.

I’m on record that although the Times ran with this story for treasonous reason I don’t think we should challenge their First Amendment protection.  (Or mine as a citizen and Blogger.) However that protection does not apply to the Times source who should be punished for Treason!  Anyone know what the Constitution provides for that crime?

Comments

Rob
Rob
17485 comments
Send a private message

I’m not sure that leaking details about an anti-terror program to the American press meets the definitions for treason.  But certainly it was an illegal leak, and the perpetrator (though not the journalists as you point out) should be punished.

Though, if it takes putting a reporter or two in jail until they ‘fess up on their sources I’m all in favor of that.


When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on October 22, 2006 at 10:17 am

Though, if it takes putting a reporter or two in jail until they ‘fess up on their sources I’m all in favor of that.

^
No. This type of behavior inhibits a reporters ability to do their job and inform the public. When we inhibit the publics ability to be informed, we are inhibiting democracy because for democracy to function, the people must be informed. For example, it doesn’t matter if everyone in the country supports going to Iraq if the case is made entirely with lies. That is a failure of democracy.


rasberry

Sparkie Arbuckle on October 22, 2006 at 10:26 am
Rob
Rob
17485 comments
Send a private message

This type of behavior inhibits a reporters ability to do their job and inform the public. When we inhibit the publics ability to be informed, we are inhibiting democracy because for democracy to function, the people must be informed.

We don’t elect reporters to make decisions about what sort of national security information should and should not be made public. 

It’s just not their responsibility.


When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on October 22, 2006 at 10:28 am

Rob...What does the Constitution provide for treason?

Zsa Zsa on October 22, 2006 at 10:36 am

That’s why the issue is with the leakers. I just disagree that reporters should be thrown in jail. they are doing their job, namely, reporting.


rasberry

Sparkie Arbuckle on October 22, 2006 at 10:36 am
Avatar for muniz

For the second time in 24 hours I will tell you what the constitution says about treason, because apparently you love to throw the word around.

Article 3, Section 3 of the Constitution defines treason.

Section 3: Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

The Congress shall have power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.

So first, other than the reporter, it is doubtful that a second witness to the act could be found.  Secondly, it would be quite a legal stretch to equate leaking classified material to the American press with colluding with the enemy.  Granted, through the most elementary of intelligence means (like reading the paper), the enemy has gained that classified knowledge, but it was not with direct communication or collusion. 

Simply put, once again, the charge of treason has absolutely no bearing in this conversation whatsoever.

muniz on October 22, 2006 at 10:46 am
Rob
Rob
17485 comments
Send a private message

I just disagree that reporters should be thrown in jail. they are doing their job, namely, reporting.

I only think we should throw them in jail if they refuse to cooperate with court orders and subpoenas requiring them to identify their sources.


When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on October 22, 2006 at 10:48 am
Avatar for muniz

I only think we should throw them in jail if they refuse to cooperate with court orders and subpoenas requiring them to identify their sources.

I totally agree.  And, typically, anyone who refuses to cooperate with court orders and subpoenas is thrown in jail.  Even reporters.  The problem here is the sometimes questionable nature of those court orders and subpoenas.  More often than not, however, they are indeed warranted.  Also more often than not, those reporters are willing to go to jail to protect their sources.  That’s part of the ideology they follow when making the decision to become a reporter in the first place.

muniz on October 22, 2006 at 10:59 am

They can print the story.  That’s freedom of the press.  Their protection does not extend to the leaker.  Reporters have no right to cover up a crime.  If they do they should sit in jail until.....


What’s going to happen to US industry when the global warming extremists like John McCain double the price of electricity?  I would think all these factories will close and set up in countries where they aren’t scared of technology.


The Whistler's signature
The Whistler on October 22, 2006 at 11:24 am

Wiki:

Therefore the United States Code at 18 U.S.C. § 2381 states “whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.”

Emphasis Mine.

In my opinion the leaker of the program likely committed treason, although I now realize that it would be tough to prove.  I’m sure there’s easier laws to prosecute the leaker that should be used.


What’s going to happen to US industry when the global warming extremists like John McCain double the price of electricity?  I would think all these factories will close and set up in countries where they aren’t scared of technology.


The Whistler's signature
The Whistler on October 22, 2006 at 03:42 pm

Reporters are NOT outside the law. Yes, they have a journalistic responsibility, but becoming employed by the media does not exempt them from the law. It should be a tightrope act to distinguish responsible journalism from ethical or legal violations. Instead of a tightrope it’s become a trampoline with reporters bouncing all over and disregarding any boundaries.


Election ‘08 - We Are So Screwed

Pilgrim on October 23, 2006 at 06:14 am

And, yes, whoever leaked this should be found and prosecuted. I don’t understand why the Justice Department isn’t doing just that.


Election ‘08 - We Are So Screwed

Pilgrim on October 23, 2006 at 06:15 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses. Confirm your email address here.