NY Times Admits They Should Have Not Told the Terroists About the Terrorist Financial Tracking
Well, it seems a bit late since you torpedoed a successful, legal and secret program. I’m sure that the Terrorists networks changed their procedures know that the Terrorist Times did their research for them.
Michelle Malkin (Blogger-Babe)
Since the job of public editor requires me to probe and question the published work and wisdom of Times journalists, there’s a special responsibility for me to acknowledge my own flawed assessments.
My July 2 column strongly supported The Times’s decision to publish its June 23 article on a once-secret banking-data surveillance program. After pondering for several months, I have decided I was off base. There were reasons to publish the controversial article, but they were slightly outweighed by two factors to which I gave too little emphasis. While it’s a close call now, as it was then, I don’t think the article should have been published.
I’m on record that although the Times ran with this story for treasonous reason I don’t think we should challenge their First Amendment protection. (Or mine as a citizen and Blogger.) However that protection does not apply to the Times source who should be punished for Treason! Anyone know what the Constitution provides for that crime?
