Home Mobile Authors Say Anything Register Login

Wednesday, November 29, 2006

Nothing Like Empowering People You Don’t Believe In

Text of classified administration memo

The New York Times today published a classified, five-page memo written by National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley assessing the situation in Iraq. This is the published text:

"We returned from Iraq convinced we need to determine if Prime Minister Maliki is both willing and able to rise above the sectarian agendas being promoted by others. Do we and Prime Minister Maliki share the same vision for Iraq? If so, is he able to curb those who seek Shia hegemony or the reassertion of Sunni power? The answers to these questions are key in determining whether we have the right strategy in Iraq. Maliki reiterated a vision of Shia, Sunni, and Kurdish partnership, and in my one-on-one meeting with him, he impressed me as a leader who wanted to be strong but was having difficulty figuring out how to do so.

“Maliki pointed to incidents, such as the use of Iraqi forces in Shia Karbala, to demonstrate his even hand. Perhaps because he is frustrated over his limited ability to command Iraqi forces against terrorists and insurgents, Maliki has been trying to show strength by standing up to the coalition. Hence the public spats with us over benchmarks and the Sadr City roadblocks.

“Despite Maliki’s reassuring words, repeated reports from our commanders on the ground contributed to our concerns about Maliki’s government. Reports of nondelivery of services to Sunni areas, intervention by the prime minister’s office to stop military action against Shia targets and to encourage them against Sunni ones, removal of Iraq’s most effective commanders on a sectarian basis and efforts to ensure Shia majorities in all ministries—when combined with the escalation of Jaish al-Mahdi’s (JAM) [the Arabic name for the Mahdi Army] killings—all suggest a campaign to consolidate Shia power in Baghdad.

“While there does seem to be an aggressive push to consolidate Shia power and influence, it is less clear whether Maliki is a witting participant. The information he receives is undoubtedly skewed by his small circle of Dawa advisers, coloring his actions and interpretation of reality. His intentions seem good when he talks with Americans, and sensitive reporting suggests he is trying to stand up to the Shia hierarchy and force positive change. But the reality on the streets of Baghdad suggests Maliki is either ignorant of what is going on, misrepresenting his intentions, or that his capabilities are not yet sufficient to turn his good intentions into action.

“Steps Maliki Could Take

“There is a range of actions that Maliki could take to improve the information he receives, demonstrate his intentions to build an Iraq for all Iraqis and increase his capabilities. The actions listed below are in order of escalating difficulty and, at some point, may require additional political and security resources to execute, as described on Page 3 of this memo. Maliki should:

“Compel his ministers to take small steps—such as providing health services and opening bank branches in Sunni neighborhoods—to demonstrate that his government serves all ethnic communities.

“Bring his political strategy with Moktada al-Sadr to closure and bring to justice any JAM actors that do not eschew violence.

“Shake up his cabinet by appointing nonsectarian, capable technocrats in key service (and security) ministries.

“Announce an overhaul of his own personal staff so that “it reflects the face of Iraq.

“Demand that all government workers (in ministries, the Council of Representatives and his own offices) publicly renounce all violence for the pursuit of political goals as a condition for keeping their positions.

“Declare that Iraq will support the renewal of the U.N. mandate for multinational forces and will seek, as appropriate, to address bilateral issues with the United States through a SOFA [status of forces agreement] to be negotiated over the next year.

“Take one or more immediate steps to inject momentum back into the reconciliation process, such as a suspension of de-Baathification measures and the submission to the Parliament or “Council of Representatives” of a draft piece of legislation for a more judicial approach.

“Announce plans to expand the Iraqi Army over the next nine months; and

Declare the immediate suspension of suspect Iraqi police units and a robust program of embedding coalition forces into MOI [Ministry of the Interior] units while the MOI is revetted and retrained.

“What We Can Do to Help Maliki

“If Maliki is willing to move decisively on the actions above, we can help him in a variety of ways. We should be willing to:

“Continue to target al-Qaeda and insurgent strongholds in Baghdad to demonstrate the Shia do not need the JAM to protect their families—and that we are a reliable partner;

“Encourage Zal [Zalmay Khalilzad, the American ambassador] to move into the background and let Maliki take more credit for positive developments. (We want Maliki to exert his authority—and demonstrate to Iraqis that he is a strong leader—by taking action against extremists, not by pushing back on the United States and the Coalition.);

“Continue our diplomatic efforts to keep the Sunnis in the political process by pushing for the negotiation of a national compact and by talking up provincial council elections next spring/summer as a mechanism for Sunni empowerment;

“Support his announcement to expand the Iraqi Army and reform the MOI more aggressively;

“Seek ways to strengthen Maliki immediately by giving him additional control over Iraqi forces, although we must recognize that in the immediate time frame, we would likely be able to give him more authority over existing forces, not more forces;

“Continue to pressure Iran and Syria to end their interference in Iraq, in part by hitting back at Iranian proxies in Iraq and by Secretary Rice holding an Iraq-plus-neighbors meeting in the region in early December; and

“Step up our efforts to get Saudi Arabia to take a leadership role in supporting Iraq by using its influence to move Sunni populations in Iraq out of violence into politics, to cut off any public or private funding provided to the insurgents or death squads from the region and to lean on Syria to terminate its support for Baathists and insurgent leaders.

Augmenting Maliki’s Political and Security Capabilities

“The above approach may prove difficult to execute even if Maliki has the right intentions. He may simply not have the political or security capabilities to take such steps, which risk alienating his narrow Sadrist political base and require a greater number of more reliable forces. Pushing Maliki to take these steps without augmenting his capabilities could force him to failure—if the Parliament removes him from office with a majority vote or if action against the Mahdi militia (JAM) causes elements of the Iraqi Security Forces to fracture and leads to major Shia disturbances in southern Iraq. We must also be mindful of Maliki’s personal history as a figure in the Dawa Party—an underground conspiratorial movement—during Saddam’s rule. Maliki and those around him are naturally inclined to distrust new actors, and it may take strong assurances from the United States ultimately to convince him to expand his circle of advisers or take action against the interests of his own Shia coalition and for the benefit of Iraq as a whole.

“If it is Maliki’s assessment that he does not have the capability—politically or militarily—to take the steps outlined above, we will need to work with him to augment his capabilities. We could do so in two ways. First, we could help him form a new political base among moderate politicians from Sunni, Shia, Kurdish and other communities. Ideally, this base would constitute a new parliamentary bloc that would free Maliki from his current narrow reliance on Shia actors. (This bloc would not require a new election, but would rather involve a realignment of political actors within the Parliament). In its creation, Maliki would need to be willing to risk alienating some of his Shia political base and may need to get the approval of Ayatollah Sistani for actions that could split the Shia politically. Second, we need to provide Maliki with additional forces of some kind.

“This approach would require that we take steps beyond those laid out above, to include:

“Actively support Maliki in helping him develop an alternative political base. We would likely need to use our own political capital to press moderates to align themselves with Maliki’s new political bloc;

“Consider monetary support to moderate groups that have been seeking to break with larger, more sectarian parties, as well as to support Maliki himself as he declares himself the leader of his bloc and risks his position within Dawa and the Sadrists; and

“Provide Maliki with more resources to help build a nonsectarian national movement.

# If we expect him to adopt a nonsectarian security agenda, we must ensure he has reasonably nonsectarian security institutions to execute it—such as through a more robust embedding program.

# We might also need to fill the current four-brigade gap in Baghdad with coalition forces if reliable Iraqi forces are not identified.

“Moving Ahead

“We should waste no time in our efforts to determine Maliki’s intentions and, if necessary, to augment his capabilities. We might take the following steps immediately:

“Convince Maliki to deliver on key actions that might reassure Sunnis (open banks and direct electricity rebuilding in Sunni areas, depoliticize hospitals);

“Tell Maliki that we understand that he is working his own strategy for dealing with the Sadrists and that:

# You have asked General Casey to support Maliki in this effort

# It is important that we see some tangible results in this strategy soon;

“Send your personal representative to Baghdad to discuss this strategy with Maliki and to press other leaders to work with him, especially if he determines that he must build an alternative political base;

“Ask Casey to develop a plan to empower Maliki, including:

# Formation of National Strike Forces

# Dramatic increase in National Police embedding

# More forces under Maliki command and control

“Ask Secretary of Defense and General Casey to make a recommendation about whether more forces are need in Baghdad;

“Ask Secretary of Defense and General Casey to devise a more robust embedding plan and a plan to resource it;

“Direct your cabinet to begin an intensive press on Saudi Arabia to play a leadership role on Iraq, connecting this role with other areas in which Saudi Arabia wants to see U.S. action;

“If Maliki seeks to build an alternative political base:

# Press Sunni and other Iraqi leaders (especially Hakim) [Abdul Aziz al-Hakim, the leader of the Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq, a Maliki rival] to support Maliki

# Engage Sistani to reassure and seek his support for a new nonsectarian political movement.

Comments

The real news is that New York Times lied as usual.  And your characterization given by your title “Nothing Like Empowering People You Don’t Believe In” is complete and utter horse sh*t.

This memo is very constructive and contains a number of very good ideas.  You need to start reading these sorts of documents more carefully, and with an open mind.

Carrick on November 29, 2006 at 10:19 am

From the text:  But the reality on the streets of Baghdad suggests Maliki is either ignorant of what is going on, misrepresenting his intentions, or that his capabilities are not yet sufficient to turn his good intentions into action.

Hadley says basicly Maliki is either stupid, lying, or incompentent.

Doesn’t sound like there is much faith.

freerepublicans.com on November 29, 2006 at 10:48 am

What does this mean to you “… or that his capabilities are not yet sufficient to turn his good intentions into action”? 

The other two are possibilities also, but it is most likely that he simply lacks the capability to act.  But that is not the same thing as incompetence, merely a statement that he currently lacks the tools to effectively change the “reality on the streets”

The point of the memo is to provide a plan for how to empower him so that he can effect changes, assuming that he is acting in the best of intentions.  It’s simply realistic to enumerate the possibilities for why Maliki has failed to act, going into a meeting like this.

If Maliki is disinterested in doing what needs to be done, then perhaps it’s time to cut our losses.  Given an Iraqi government that is unwilling to curb sectarian violence, I see little reason to continue to support them.  But I really don’t think that’s what’s happening right now.

Carrick on November 29, 2006 at 11:16 am

What does this mean to you “… or that his capabilities are not yet sufficient to turn his good intentions into action”?

That he’s incompetent.

The other two are possibilities also, but it is most likely that he simply lacks the capability to act.

Then he is incompentent and not qualified to lead his nation.

freerepublicans.com on November 29, 2006 at 11:19 am

Me:

What does this mean to you “… or that his capabilities are not yet sufficient to turn his good intentions into action”?

Freep:

That he’s incompetent.

Then you need to learn to read.

Carrick on November 29, 2006 at 01:43 pm

"his capabilities are not yet sufficient” literally means “he’s incapable of doing the job.”

If your going to tell me that incapable and incompetent have different meanings you are just douche.

freerepublicans.com on November 29, 2006 at 02:59 pm

If your going to tell me that incapable and incompetent have different meanings you are just douche.

If you’re going to insult somebody’s English, it’s customary to get your own grammar and spelling correct.  That’s “If you’re going” and “you are just a douche.” Other wise you just look stupid.

Bu the words do have different meanings:

Incompetent (n): lacking the ability to adequately perform a task.

Incapable (n): lacking the means or resources to perform a task.

I could be competent with respect to writing a program to solve a parital differential equation numerically.  But if I lack the proper resources ... in this case a fast enough super computer, I would be incapable of doing so regardless of my competency.

Really, Freep… why do you suppose we have two words if they mean the same thing?

LOL

Carrick on November 29, 2006 at 04:08 pm

why do you suppose we have two words if they mean the same thing?

Why do flammable and inflamable mean the same thing?

Why do you think proper english must be used on a blog?

freerepublicans.com on November 29, 2006 at 04:24 pm

Flammable and inflamable are in fact variations on the same root word.  Incompetent and incapable have separate root words and separate meanings.  You disagree with me, Einstein?  Then go out and find dictionary definitions which prove that in common usage they have the same meaning.

De facto, the two words mean different things, and it is important in this context because it vastly changes the meaning of the document.... what I meant by “learning to read”.

Furthermore, in arriving at your contorted interpretation of the memo, you had to (a) cherry pick that sentence, and (b) not look at it in context of the rest of the document.  When reading documents of this sort, it is customary to test our interpretation of a particular sentence or paragraph by reading it in context to the remainder of the document.

That’s what I mean by “learning to read”.

In this case, it’s even simpler...you’ve simply misinterpreted the meaning of one word (the ultimate cherry pick) and used that to contort the entire memo into a new meaning....which is what I meant when I said contorted.

Why do you think proper english must be used on a blog?

I don’t.  I just was pointing out that it makes you look like a dumbass if you’re going to name call in the disagreement over the interpretation of two words, but can’t even construct a grammatically correct sentence at a ninth grade level.  Just saying…

Carrick on November 29, 2006 at 04:39 pm
Avatar for aNONOMISLY

One of the worst part of the memo:

Despite Maliki’s reassuring words, repeated reports from our commanders on the ground contributed to our concerns about Maliki’s government. Reports of nondelivery of services to Sunni areas, intervention by the prime minister’s office to stop military action against Shia targets and to encourage them against Sunni ones, removal of Iraq’s most effective commanders on a sectarian basis and efforts to ensure Shia majorities in all ministries—when combined with the escalation of Jaish al-Mahdi’s (JAM) [the Arabic name for the Mahdi Army] killings—all suggest a campaign to consolidate Shia power in Baghdad

sounds like al-Maliki is practically making himself into a secterian leader. ..we have gone with many of his desires, and in doing so have unwittingly picked a side (the Shias) in the current civil war taking place in Iraq. ..I don’t think that’s very healthy.

aNONOMISLY on November 29, 2006 at 06:37 pm

This “memo” is just too convenient and too “well-timed” to be true.  With all the lying that has been recently revealed, why should we believe anything the MSM puts out?


If you don’t know by now, don’t mess with it.

robert108 on November 29, 2006 at 06:42 pm
Avatar for aNONOMISLY

This “memo” is just too convenient and too “well-timed” to be true.  With all the lying that has been recently revealed, why should we believe anything the MSM puts out?

gee, wouldn’t the White House would have told us already if it wasn’t written by Hadley.  ..or are you saying if was written by Hadley for the stratigic purpuse of leaking it?

____________________

some general thoughts not directed at the quote above:
The Iraqi government under al-Maliki is a Banana Republic government at its worst. It seems not to be much in the business of serving the people, as it is viewed as an asset to be looted by too many in power (i.e. you take the police force and I take the hospitals and health ministry).

It may be that despite his best intentions, al-Maliki is just simply inscapable of doing much else. ..but that make much conforting, though.

aNONOMISLY on November 29, 2006 at 07:36 pm

gee, wouldn’t the White House would have told us already if it wasn’t written by Hadley

Absence of denial is not proof of truthfulness.  You should know that much.


If you don’t know by now, don’t mess with it.

robert108 on November 29, 2006 at 08:47 pm
Avatar for Bat One

Why do you think proper english (sic) must be used on a blog?

Freep,

Proper English should be used everywhere, if only for the sake of those to whom you are trying to communicate.  To paraphrase a correspondent of the great critic, John Simon, language is one of the few wealths available to us all.  And the returns far, far outweigh the modest investment necessary.

Bat One on November 29, 2006 at 08:58 pm
Avatar for Bat One

Freep,

By the way, douche is not an adjective.

Bat One on November 29, 2006 at 09:01 pm
Avatar for aNONOMISLY

Absence of denial is not proof of truthfulness.  You should know that much.

If it wasn’t written by Haley, then the immediete thing for the White House to do would be to condemn it, and point said fact.  That is hasn’t argued against the validity of the memo if an enormous suggestion the ‘memo’ is in fact valid.

aNONOMISLY on November 29, 2006 at 09:15 pm
Avatar for aNONOMISLY

i.e. Absence of denial suggests truth, in this case.

aNONOMISLY on November 29, 2006 at 09:21 pm

Absence of denial suggests truth, in this case.

That “suggestion” exists only in your mind, in this case.  You are already on record many times as believing this about Maliki, so it reinforces your view.  Nothing more.


If you don’t know by now, don’t mess with it.

robert108 on November 29, 2006 at 10:15 pm

By the way, douche is not an adjective.

Actually, I believe he intended the noun form, which would be douchebag, I believe.  It’s just pathetic when someone tries to be so cool, then blows the insult with bad English.  Very funny.


If you don’t know by now, don’t mess with it.

robert108 on November 29, 2006 at 10:19 pm
Avatar for aNONOMISLY

rob, so you don’t believe or have strong suspicion the memo wasn’t written by a senior White House official?

____

expanding on my comment on the current Iraqi government been set up much as the worst banana republic’s government, ..

In government, [Muqtada al-Sadr] controls key ministries such as health and education, allowing him to build his base and his militia by channeling vital services and jobs to his supporters.

the health ministry runs most of the hospitals, which happen to be public hospitals.

aNONOMISLY on November 29, 2006 at 10:34 pm
Avatar for aNONOMISLY

]rob108, you’re wrong; it’s not only in my mind, lol.

here’s what rob (the senior one , lol) said:

That [New York Times] has published yet another classified document, this one written by National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley and detailing a lack of confidence in Iraqi Prime Minister al-Maliki.

aNONOMISLY on November 29, 2006 at 10:38 pm

rob, so you don’t believe or have strong suspicion the memo wasn’t written by a senior White House official?

I don’t know if it was completely faked, a’la Dan Rather, or just cherry-picked and quoted partially out of context, but I do know that releasing it was yet another attempt by the NYT to undermine this President and the effort to establish a modern state in Iraq.  Even if it’s 100% true and accurate and true in and of itself, are there other supportive documents that they chose not to print?  Were they even interested in finding all the relevant material, or were they looking for just this sort of thing?
Who was served by releasing this material, be it true or untrue?  Certainly not the security interests either of this country or of the peaceful future of Iraq.  Think about it, when you get over the ego rush.


If you don’t know by now, don’t mess with it.

robert108 on November 29, 2006 at 10:40 pm

]rob108, you’re wrong; it’s not only in my mind, lol.

Weight of opinion doesn’t demonstrate truth, either.
Columbus was not in the majority when he suggested that he could go East by sailing West, but he was right, and the weight of opinion was wrong.


If you don’t know by now, don’t mess with it.

robert108 on November 29, 2006 at 10:43 pm

Weight of opinion doesn’t demonstrate truth, either.
Columbus was not in the majority when he suggested that he could go East by sailing West, but he was right, and the weight of opinion was wrong.

cool

anonomisly on November 29, 2006 at 10:57 pm

rob, what’s your take on al-Maliki?

anonomisly on November 29, 2006 at 11:04 pm

rob, here’s your truth, ..

Senior Administration Official:

SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: I’d just add that I think a little bit of getting beyond just the headline of the story and taking it in complete context and tenor of the memo demonstrates that important questions and obvious points of assessment are being made by the administration. But the broad conclusion, as identified in that very memo is that the big deficiency is capability. That’s something that Prime Minister Maliki has discussed publicly, as well as privately, with us; it’s something that we have acknowledged. One of the central tenets of this meeting is, how do we increase his capability to turn his good intentions, as described in this memo, into concrete action.

And everybody recognizes it, and those who understand the command and control issues, when it comes to Iraqi security forces, they come under MNFI authority and command. What he is looking for and what he is hoping to demonstrate is more direct effect on the security situation, particularly the sectarian violence. He believes he needs greater autonomy and control over certain aspects of his security forces in order to accomplish that. A lot of the work that has been done in the last month is to determine how best to do that, and that’s what the two leaders are going to be spending a lot of time tonight and tomorrow morning on.

SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Let me just say that while we’re discussing the memo I want this to be ON BACKGROUND. We can try to sort out things beyond this.

Q Were those last comments on the record?

SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: No, those are background comments. We said any comments about this was on background.

SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: If you ask about the memo, it’s going to be on background.

..so it seems part of that capability gap can be shortened by perhaps by having al-Maliki have more direct command and control of the Iraqi Army, ...but that’s where competance comes in.

anonomisly on November 29, 2006 at 11:27 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses. Confirm your email address here.