Home (Post) Mobile Authors Say Anything Register Login

Tuesday, September 04, 2007

National Health Care - the British Model

For those American conservatives still reeling from the socialist tinge of the Bush administration’s “compassionate conservatism”, and those who are aghast at the prospect of surrendering our individual liberties under the assorted nationalized health care plans offered by collectivist Democrats, this report from across the pond ought to reinforce your determination to fight on.

Patients who refuse to change their unhealthy lifestyles should not be treated by the NHS, the Conservatives said today.

In a bid to ease spiralling levels of obesity and other health concerns, a Tory panel said certain treatments should be denied to patients who refuse to co-operate with health professionals and live healthier lifestyles.

And those who do manage to improve their general health by losing weight and quitting smoking, for example, would receive “Health Miles” cards.
Points earned could then be used to pay for health-related products such as gym membership and fresh vegetables.

This well-intended idiocy, by Conservative Tories, no less, is what happens when government assumes responsibility for areas more properly left to individual decision making and a truly free market.  In essence, they are suggesting, as did John Edwards just this past week, that all health care decisions should be made by the government, and if the government disapproves of your lifestyle choices, you will have no access to any sort of health care.

“It is inconsistent with the concept of the responsible citizen to imagine that it is realistic for citizens, having paid their taxes, to expect that the state will underwrite the health implications of any lifestyle decision they choose to make,” the report states.

Gee… I wonder what legal sanctions would be considered appropriate if someone who is HIV-positive is found to be having sexual relations.  Take away some of those fresh vegetables, maybe?

There is no suggestion in the report that those who smoke, don’t exercise, or eat at McDonalds 4 times a week, would be entitled to a refund on their income tax forms, of course.

Comments

Proof
Proof
12866 comments
Send a private message

“It is inconsistent with the concept of the responsible citizen to imagine that it is realistic for citizens, having paid their taxes, to expect that the state will underwrite the health implications of any lifestyle decision they choose to make,” the report states.

Exactly! If the State is responsible for your health care, then the State should be able to dictate to you how you live your life!
The way to maintain individual freedom is for individuals to take responsibility for themselves.
At which point the liberal chorus chimes in with the exceptions to the rule: What about the poor, the differently abled, yada, yada, yada! 
We are a compassionate society. We can make exceptions to the rules for hard cases. (The saying holds true: Hard cases make bad law.)



Better to have it and not need it than need it and not have it.
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Proof on September 5, 2007 at 06:04 am

"He who has the gold, makes the rules,” is aways counted as a crass bit of rightwing insensitivity by Democrats and the leftist press… unless its the government with all the money and all the rules.  Then, of course, there is always plenty of rationalization for limiting our freedom to facilitate yet another “entitlement” program for the benefit of those who can’t be bothered to take care of themselves and their families, preferring to live off the efforts of those who can.

The problem with national universal health care coverage is that it is universal… everyone is forced to participate.  The result is that the government becomes the sole authority for everything related to health care.

My reading of the Constitution and the Federalist Papers is that the purpose was to limit the scope of government, not search out excuses for more of it.  We’re moving in the wrong direction.


“Poverty of goods is easily cured; poverty of the mind is irreparable.”

Bat One on September 5, 2007 at 06:24 am
Proof
Proof
12866 comments
Send a private message

The problem with national universal health care coverage is that it is universal… everyone is forced to participate.

Actually, I’d say the problem with national universal health care coverage is that it is NOT universal… everyone is forced to participate, with the exception of the Ruling Classes.
Tell me when the Clintons, Edwards, Kerry-Heinz, & the Kennedys are in the queue waiting to see a doctor or get a test and I’ll believe it’s good for everybody!



Better to have it and not need it than need it and not have it.
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Proof on September 5, 2007 at 07:08 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses. Confirm your email address here.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.