Home Mobile Authors Say Anything Register Login

Friday, April 18, 2008

Michelle Obama’s Racist Views

FYI: I have not verified all of this, but I think it is worthy of your attention.

In her senior thesis at Princeton, Michele Obama, the wife of Barack Obama stated that America was a nation founded on “crime and hatred”. Moreover, she stated that whites in America were “ineradicably racist”.

The 1985 thesis, titled “Princeton-Educated Blacks and the Black Community” was written under her maiden name, Michelle LaVaughn Robinson. Michelle Obama stated in her thesis that to “Whites at Princeton, it often seems as if, to them, she will always be Black first” However, it was reported by a fellow black classmate, “If those “Whites at Princeton “ really saw Michelle as one who always would “be Black first,” it seems that she gave them that impression”.

Most alarming is Michele Obama’s use of the terms “separationist” and “integrationist” when describing the views of black people. Mrs. Obama clearly identifies herself with a “separationist” view of race. “By actually working with the Black lower class or within their communities as a result of their ideologies, a separationist may better understand the desperation of their situation and feel more hopeless about a resolution as opposed to an integrationist who is ignorant to their plight.”

Obama writes that the path she chose by attending Princeton would likely lead to her “further integration and/or assimilation into a white cultural and social structure that will only allow me to remain on the periphery of society; never becoming a full participant.” Michele Obama clearly has a chip on her shoulder. Not only does she see separate black and white societies in America, but she elevates black over white in her world.

Here is another passage that is uncomfortable and ominous in meaning: “There was no doubt in my mind that as a member of the black community, I am obligated to this community and will utilize all of my present and future resources to benefit the black community first and foremost.” What is Michelle Obama planning to do with her future resources if she’s first lady that will elevate black over white in America?

The following passage appears to be a call to arms for affirmative action policies that could be the hallmark of an Obama administration.
“Predominately white universities like Princeton are socially and academically designed to cater to the needs of the white students comprising the bulk of their enrollments.”

The conclusion of her thesis is alarming. Michelle Obama’s poll of black alumni concludes that other black students at Princeton do not share her obsession with blackness. But rather than celebrate, she is horrified that black alumni identify with our common American culture more than they value the color of their skin. “I hoped that these findings would help me conclude that despite the high degree of identification with whites as a result of the educational and occupational path that black Princeton alumni follow, the alumni would still maintain a certain level of identification with the black community. However, these findings do not support this possibility.”

Is it no wonder that most black alumni ignored her racist questionnaire? Only 89 students responded out of 400 who were asked for input.
Michelle Obama does not look into a crowd of Obama supporters and see Americans. She sees black people and white people eternally conflicted with one another. The thesis provides a trove of Mrs. Obama’s thoughts and world view seen through a race-based prism. This is a very divisive view for a potential first lady that would do untold damage to race relations in this country in a Barack Obama administration.

Michelle Obama’s intellectually refined racism should give all Americans pause for deep concern. Now maybe she’s changed, but she sure sounds like someone with an axe to grind with America. Will the press let Michelle get a free pass over her obviously racist comment about American whites? I am sure that it will.  But it shouldn’t.
.

In her senior thesis at Princeton, Michele Obama, the wife of Barack Obama stated that America was a nation founded on “crime and hatred”. Moreover, she stated that whites in America were “ineradicably racist”.  The 1985 thesis, titled “Princeton-Educated Blacks and the Black Community” was written under her maiden name, Michelle LaVaughn Robinson.
Michelle Obama stated in her thesis that to “Whites at Princeton , it often seems as if, to them, she will always be Black first...” However, it was reported by a fellow black classmate, “If those “Whites at Princeton “ really saw Michelle as one who always would “be Black first,” it seems that she gave them that impression”.
Most alarming is Michele Obama’s use of the terms “separationist” and “integrationist” when describing the views of black people.
Mrs. Obama clearly identifies herself with a “separationist” view of race.
“By actually working with the Black lower class or within their communities as a result of their ideologies, a separationist may better understand the desperation of their situation and feel more hopeless about a resolution as opposed to an integrationist who is ignorant to their plight.”
Obama writes that the path she chose by attending Princeton would likely lead to her “further integration and/or assimilation into a white cultural and social structure that will only allow me to remain on the periphery of society; never becoming a full participant.”
Michele Obama clearly has a chip on her shoulder.
Not only does she see separate black and white societies in America , but she elevates black over white in her world.

Here is another passage that is uncomfortable and ominous in meaning:
“There was no doubt in my mind that as a member of the black community, I am obligated to this community and will utilize all of my present and future resources to benefit the black community first and foremost. “
What is Michelle Obama planning to do with her future resources if she’s first lady that will elevate black over white in America ?
The following passage appears to be a call to arms for affirmative action policies that could be the hallmark of an Obama administration.
“Predominately white universities like Princeton are socially and academically designed to cater to the needs of the white students comprising the bulk of their enrollments.”

The conclusion of her thesis is alarming. Michelle Obama’s poll of black alumni concludes that other black students at Princeton do not share her obsession with blackness. But rather than celebrate, she is horrified that black alumni identify with our common American culture more than they value the color of their skin. “I hoped that these findings would help me conclude that despite the high degree of identification with whites as a result of the educational and occupational path that black Princeton alumni follow, the alumni would still maintain a certain level of identification with the black community. However, these findings do not support this possibility.”

Is it no wonder that most black alumni ignored her racist questionnaire? Only 89 students responded out of 400 who were asked for input.
Michelle Obama does not look into a crowd of Obama supporters and see Americans. She sees black people and white people eternally conflicted with one another. The thesis provides a trove of Mrs. Obama’s thoughts and world view seen through a race-based prism. This is a very divisive view for a potential first lady that would do untold damage to race relations in this country in a Barack Obama administration.

Michelle Obama’s intellectually refined racism should give all Americans pause for deep concern. Now maybe she’s changed, but she sure sounds like someone with an axe to grind with America. Will the press let Michelle get a free pass over her obviously racist comment about American whites?  I am sure that it will.  But it shouldn’t.

PS: We paid for her scholarship

Comments

interesting and provocative post, Neiman.


"Here lies, in honored glory, an American soldier, known but to God.”

The stakes are high. Whether the issue is the economy, or energy, or the federal courts or national security, the right answers are coming not from the Democrats, but from the Republicans. The surge of operations that began a year ago is succeeding. The only way to lose this fight is to quit. Richard M. Cheney, Vice President, 30 May, 2008

pparets on April 18, 2008 at 08:42 pm
Avatar for Lestat

WHITE POWER!!!!

Lestat on April 18, 2008 at 10:22 pm

Lawdie Lawd, Neiman shonuf gunna hav hisself some hardtimes ifen a colored boy done gits de votes teh be de prezdent. Lawd hav mersee.

An a colored woman gonna be de furst lady…Oh Lawd some chainges a comin


“If a conservative is still a republican after the last 13 years, he is blind to the fact that his party of choice has failed him utterly.” – Realitybasedbob

realitybasedbob on April 19, 2008 at 07:29 am

rbb what that a personal attack?


“If a conservative is still a republican after the last 13 years, he is blind to the fact that his party of choice has failed him utterly.” – Realitybasedbob

realitybasedbob on April 19, 2008 at 07:30 am

ya know, it just might have been…


“If a conservative is still a republican after the last 13 years, he is blind to the fact that his party of choice has failed him utterly.” – Realitybasedbob

realitybasedbob on April 19, 2008 at 07:30 am

The trolls are talking to themselves again!



A troll is someone who only wants to stir up trouble, not have an honest debate.  Some signs that a poster is a troll:
* Dodges questions from other posters * Refuses to give sources
* When one of its arguments is shown to be false, either ignores the proof or moves the goalposts.  Heh. (From the LGF faq)

Proof on April 19, 2008 at 07:43 am

Even with the MSM coverup, Barack and Michelle stand out as separatist, skin color racists, with no good intentions for what they regard as “White America”.  Why would we want to elect a President who we know, going in, has no intention of representing all Americans?


If you don’t know by now, don’t mess with it.

robert108 on April 19, 2008 at 08:30 am

ummm....  because some here think it might be better than electing John McCain?


"Here lies, in honored glory, an American soldier, known but to God.”

The stakes are high. Whether the issue is the economy, or energy, or the federal courts or national security, the right answers are coming not from the Democrats, but from the Republicans. The surge of operations that began a year ago is succeeding. The only way to lose this fight is to quit. Richard M. Cheney, Vice President, 30 May, 2008

pparets on April 19, 2008 at 08:37 am

ummm....  because some here think it might be better than electing John McCain?


"Here lies, in honored glory, an American soldier, known but to God.”

The stakes are high. Whether the issue is the economy, or energy, or the federal courts or national security, the right answers are coming not from the Democrats, but from the Republicans. The surge of operations that began a year ago is succeeding. The only way to lose this fight is to quit. Richard M. Cheney, Vice President, 30 May, 2008

pparets on April 19, 2008 at 08:38 am

Wow. You really get a sense of where one of our resident troll’s mind is at reading that garbage. It’s a window into the way he thinks and a response that betrays the fact that he can’t engage with the points that Neiman’s post brought up.

This one fancies himself a “liberal”.

likwidshoe on April 19, 2008 at 08:45 am

I would rather have a good candidate to vote for, rather than a choice between varying degrees of liberalism.  I’ve said this a few times before, but I guess it needs repeating.


If you don’t know by now, don’t mess with it.

robert108 on April 19, 2008 at 08:55 am

Wow, such harsh criticism from a drug addicted raver.

r-108 are you a LaRouche man?


“If a conservative is still a republican after the last 13 years, he is blind to the fact that his party of choice has failed him utterly.” – Realitybasedbob

realitybasedbob on April 19, 2008 at 09:21 am

robert108: 

I’ve said this a few times before, but I guess it needs repeating.

And that would be… why?

Because if you say it once, the rest of us should quickly fall in line?

We are errant students in need of your constant tutorials?

Disagreeing with any of your overblown pronouncements requires that we be punished by hearing them again and again?

Methinks you take yourself way too seriously.


"Here lies, in honored glory, an American soldier, known but to God.”

The stakes are high. Whether the issue is the economy, or energy, or the federal courts or national security, the right answers are coming not from the Democrats, but from the Republicans. The surge of operations that began a year ago is succeeding. The only way to lose this fight is to quit. Richard M. Cheney, Vice President, 30 May, 2008

pparets on April 19, 2008 at 09:29 am

robert108: 

I’ve said this a few times before, but I guess it needs repeating.

And that would be… why?

Because if you say it once, the rest of us should quickly fall in line?

We are errant students in need of your constant tutorials?

Disagreeing with any of your overblown pronouncements requires that we be punished by hearing them again and again?

Methinks you take yourself way too seriously.


"Here lies, in honored glory, an American soldier, known but to God.”

The stakes are high. Whether the issue is the economy, or energy, or the federal courts or national security, the right answers are coming not from the Democrats, but from the Republicans. The surge of operations that began a year ago is succeeding. The only way to lose this fight is to quit. Richard M. Cheney, Vice President, 30 May, 2008

pparets on April 19, 2008 at 09:35 am

I would rather have a good candidate to vote for, rather than a choice between varying degrees of liberalism. 

Ain’t nobody perfect, not even you or me.  Anyhow peoples political views change sometimes as the political environment changes.  Certainly the liberalism of today is a far reach from the liberalism 40-50 years ago.  As for myself, I voted for Democrats (JFK, LBJ, etc.) for many years then switched to libertarians because of how the government is eroding our freedoms and then left them to be more or less independant when they (the libertarians) became anti-war, anti-Bush.

Today I will definitely vote for McCain if only because I fear what will happen to our country if Clinton or Obama are elected.


The Supreme Court is a bunch of black robed tyrants

docdave on April 19, 2008 at 10:16 am

Methinks you take yourself way too seriously.

Coming from you, that’s funny!  You get very serious whenever anyone voices any disagreement with McCain.
Attacking me personally won’t make McCain any more attractive to real Republicans.

dd: We’re a very long way from perfection, bud.

Today I will definitely vote for McCain if only because I fear what will happen to our country if Clinton or Obama are elected.

I’ll probably have to settle for that, as well.  A sad commentary.


If you don’t know by now, don’t mess with it.

robert108 on April 19, 2008 at 10:28 am

I’ll probably have to settle for that, as well.  A sad commentary.

Ain’t life a bitch, rbb!!


The Supreme Court is a bunch of black robed tyrants

docdave on April 19, 2008 at 10:33 am

I’m losing it - my last comment should have gone to r108 - duh.


The Supreme Court is a bunch of black robed tyrants

docdave on April 19, 2008 at 10:34 am

"realitybased"bob - why don’t you live up to your namesake? The sad part is that you don’t even attempt to.

Go ahead and lie about me. It does nothing but destroy your credibility.

likwidshoe on April 19, 2008 at 10:38 am

Ain’t life a bitch?  I guess you can look at the situation that way, which is, IMO, the road to hopelessness and defeat.  No one succeeds by giving up, so we conservatives need to keep after McCain to at least try to live up to his bullshit claim to be “a proud Reagan conservative”.  Without constant pressure, he will default to his usual condition of pandering to the Dems.


If you don’t know by now, don’t mess with it.

robert108 on April 19, 2008 at 10:41 am

pp are your internets slow today too?


“If a conservative is still a republican after the last 13 years, he is blind to the fact that his party of choice has failed him utterly.” – Realitybasedbob

realitybasedbob on April 19, 2008 at 11:07 am

Wow, such harsh criticism from a drug addicted raver.

Go ahead and lie about me. It does nothing but destroy your credibility.

Deny if you want,lik, but it would only take a few minutes to look back to find your comments about being a raver.

Not that I care about that, I just want you to know that I know you are being less than truthful.


“If a conservative is still a republican after the last 13 years, he is blind to the fact that his party of choice has failed him utterly.” – Realitybasedbob

realitybasedbob on April 19, 2008 at 11:25 am

I wouldn’t call six experiences over a year ago as “addicted”, but whatever. As for my raver days, that ended seven years ago.

Not that I care about that, I just want you to know that I know you are being less than truthful.

You’re an idiot just looking for a cheap insult.

What are you, in your early 50’s?

Heh.

likwidshoe on April 19, 2008 at 11:33 am

What are you, in your early 50’s?

At least mentally, rbb is an adolescent.


The Supreme Court is a bunch of black robed tyrants

docdave on April 19, 2008 at 12:14 pm

For anyone interested in the truth about Mrs. Obama’s senior thesis, it is available here in 4 parts as separate .pdf files.

From what I can determine from a merely cursory reading, Neiman’s take is largely correct.

Realtitybasedbob’s attempt at verbal caricature would be insulting on any of several levels, but this is hardly the time to start taking him seriously in any case.


“Poverty of goods is easily cured; poverty of the mind is irreparable.”

Bat One on April 19, 2008 at 01:23 pm

Bat One, Neiman.  One can come to just one conclusion.  She has racist ideas.  The only question is, will she or can she change?  I am so glad that the internet is available so that The Truth can come out!
robert108:  skin color racists ?  If you get a chance elaborate please.

Why would we want to elect a President who we know, going in, has no intention of representing all Americans?

Exactly.


Communism is evil

Chief RZ on April 19, 2008 at 01:40 pm

Realtitybasedbob’s attempt at verbal caricature would be insulting on any of several levels, but this is hardly the time to start taking him seriously in any case.

Heh.



A troll is someone who only wants to stir up trouble, not have an honest debate.  Some signs that a poster is a troll:
* Dodges questions from other posters * Refuses to give sources
* When one of its arguments is shown to be false, either ignores the proof or moves the goalposts.  Heh. (From the LGF faq)

Proof on April 19, 2008 at 01:41 pm

robert108: skin color racists ?

People who judge and generalize based on skin color.  Even in the “black community”, lighter skinned individuals are considered more attractive and more intelligent than darker ones.  Barack is light-skinned, and Michelle is not only light, but has Caucasian facial features.  When you get to Colin Powell, the paradigm really breaks down.


If you don’t know by now, don’t mess with it.

robert108 on April 19, 2008 at 01:50 pm

rbb: 

pp, are your internets slow today too?

Slow!!  Linking to SAB this afternoon was like trying to connect to the mind of a liberal!! smile

Rob really needs to replace that Commodore Computer he uses as a server.


"Here lies, in honored glory, an American soldier, known but to God.”

The stakes are high. Whether the issue is the economy, or energy, or the federal courts or national security, the right answers are coming not from the Democrats, but from the Republicans. The surge of operations that began a year ago is succeeding. The only way to lose this fight is to quit. Richard M. Cheney, Vice President, 30 May, 2008

pparets on April 19, 2008 at 01:50 pm

robert108.  OK.  Good explanation.  I think I remember some discussions on this some decade ago.  I thought it was passe´ but I guess not.  Was that her problem?  What a shame to waste your life on the color of your skin, especially since so many people do not regard it as a problem.  I do think that certain peoples use their skin color as a crutch or an excuse when they do not get a job or a husband that they wanted.  I also think that it is also used like a “get out of jail free card”
I had such optimism for the US back in the 1970s, but I guess all that “equality” stuff that was coming out of the NAACP was a lie.


Communism is evil

Chief RZ on April 19, 2008 at 02:04 pm

but I guess all that “equality” stuff that was coming out of the NAACP was a lie.

yep, all equality stuff from where ever it originates is a lie.  People were created to be unique not equal.  Only identical machines (robots) are equal.


The Supreme Court is a bunch of black robed tyrants

docdave on April 19, 2008 at 02:23 pm

Chief RZ: 

I had such optimism for the US back in the 70’s

Well, we all did.  But the leaders of the black community back then morphed into professional victim advocates because that’s where the [Fed] money was.. and still is!

WE have no one to blame but ourselves because - with the best of intentions - we put those programs in place.

Net result?  Increased hostility. Increased violence. Increased illiteracy. Escalating illigitimate birth-rates. Ghetto public housing destroyed. An anti-white, anti-female, anti-American Hip-Hop culture.

Lesson learned.


"Here lies, in honored glory, an American soldier, known but to God.”

The stakes are high. Whether the issue is the economy, or energy, or the federal courts or national security, the right answers are coming not from the Democrats, but from the Republicans. The surge of operations that began a year ago is succeeding. The only way to lose this fight is to quit. Richard M. Cheney, Vice President, 30 May, 2008

pparets on April 19, 2008 at 02:28 pm

Neiman> If you can’t verify veracity of these statements, why are you putting this smut out there?

watashiwa on April 19, 2008 at 02:56 pm

Neiman> If you can’t verify veracity of these statements, why are you putting this smut out there?

I simply said I could not confirm every word to be exactly accurate, not that I did not rapidly check on the thesis itself, and I just wanted to leave room for any errors in my reading.

This need not require much investigation, Michelle has made it abundantly clear she was never proud of this country until people started voting for her colored husband. Both of them have associated with anti-white racists like Wright all their lives and they appear to have many racist views.


No matter the age or state of health, for a military man it is always glorious to tilt at windmills, rescue a fair Dulcinea and be a gallant knight in armor in a glorious cause.

Neiman on April 19, 2008 at 03:10 pm
Avatar for watashitwad

Yeah, there is NO WAY to confirm she wrote this racist ‘smut’.  Surely not by clicking this link and downloading her actual thesis and reading her racist ‘smut’ for yourself.

watashitwad on April 20, 2008 at 03:24 am
Avatar for Lyn

A good post.  Another glimpse at what the Obamas - both of them - are really like.  And you won’t find it on the front page of a newspaper nor on a big network show.

A couple of things piss me off about this Michelle Obama paper.  First, if her thesis is considered critical writing at Princeton then the White and Asian kids at Princeton need to get their money refunded.  (Blacks like Michelle Obama don’t pay to go to Princeton so they’re not out anything.) Second, this reminds me of the comment she made about 2 months ago - finally she’s not ashamed or embarassed to be American.  Still pissed about that.  Last, Barack and Michelle Obama are anti-White anti-American fanatics and people still don’t see the danger.

Don’t let Barack convince you otherwise.  Twenty years of worshipping with the mullah Rev. Wright under his fanatical mentoring.  And Michelle Obama and her defining thesis - it’s racist how else can you take it? 

These 2 can’t be allowed into the White House.

Lyn on April 21, 2008 at 06:50 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses. Confirm your email address here.