Home (Post) Mobile Authors Say Anything Register Login

Monday, September 03, 2007

Is 2007 The Year The Global Warming Hoax Died?

Alan Caruba thinks so..
When did the global warming hoax die? Historians are likely to pinpoint 2007. It will take another decade to insure it cannot be revived, but the avalanche of scientific studies and the cumulative impact of scientists who have publicly joined those who debunked the lies on which it has been based will be noted as the tipping point.

The hoax has mainly been a creation of the United Nations Environmental Program and took off in earnest with the 1992 Earth Summit. It culminated in 1997 with the Kyoto Climate Control Protocol, an agreement to reduce the generation of carbon dioxide, a

“greenhouse” gas (CO2) said to be the cause of an accelerated warming of the earth.

The United States refused to ratify the Kyoto Protocol and, at one point, the U.S. Senate unanimously passed a resolution rejecting it. This has not kept the U.S. from spending billions on so-called “climate research” intended to address climate change with the aim of reducing or capturing CO2 emissions.


Recently we have the debunking of 1998 as the hotest year this century. 
In August, it was revealed that NASA scientists had corrected an error that resulted in 1934 replacing 1998 as the warmest year on record in the U.S. Repeatedly the data put forth to justify the global warming hoax has been debunked.

As Dr. David Wojick recently noted, “The real significance is that such a small correction can make such a big difference. The reason is that the much touted warming of the last three decades is merely a return to earlier warm times, after an equally long period of cooling…There is no way this pattern constitutes a warming trend…In short, there is no evidence for human-induced global warming in the U.S. temperature record.”
There is much more refutation of the global warming hoax in the article.  Read it all.

Comments

It’s about time to remove this welfare program for totalitarians from our country.


If life doesn’t begin at conception, why do they call it birth control?

robert108 on September 3, 2007 at 12:53 pm
Avatar for HG

It is amazing to see the lengths to which “science” will go to advance the agendas, political and otherwise, of many of its scientists.  It seems that a scientist’s political and philosophical perspectives has much to say about one’s approach to the evidence. 

Surely this is not the case with evolution.

HG on September 3, 2007 at 02:10 pm

Surely this is not the case with evolution.

Yeah; what’re the chances?


If life doesn’t begin at conception, why do they call it birth control?

robert108 on September 3, 2007 at 03:23 pm

Surely this is not the case with evolution.


Surely you jest… Of course, there are real scientists, those that pretend to be scientists and those that are totally ignorant of science yet use it to advance their agendas.

You don’t have to be a moron to be a liberal Democrat but it sure helps.

docdave on September 3, 2007 at 04:59 pm

1934 replacing 1998 as the warmest year on record in the U.S.


Do not fear to be eccentric in opinion, for every opinion now accepted was once eccentric.

ManofFireandLight on September 3, 2007 at 05:18 pm
Avatar for HG

Yeah; what’re the chances?

Love the irony.

If it were chance alone it would still be far better odds than evolution supposedly overcame.  However, with the addition of intelligence, its a pretty safe bet.

HG on September 3, 2007 at 06:30 pm

1934 replacing 1998 as the warmest year on record in the U.S.

Manoff, this makes no difference since the global warmists were using this information as their principle evidence for their claim that 1998 was the start of a clatistrophic period of global warming.  When it was convenient to the hoaxers the NASA reports were chapter and verse of their position.  Now that the NASA reports have been debunked, they somehow are not really important. How disengenious of you!!!


You don’t have to be a moron to be a liberal Democrat but it sure helps.

docdave on September 4, 2007 at 06:37 am

1988 is still the warmest year on record worldwide, it is disingenuous of you to postulate that this revised data somehow debunks anthropogenic climate change theory.


Do not fear to be eccentric in opinion, for every opinion now accepted was once eccentric.

ManofFireandLight on September 4, 2007 at 10:37 am

it is disingenuous of you to postulate that this revised data somehow debunks anthropogenic climate change theory.

First, it is not I who debunk your so-called anthropogenic climate change theory, but the scientists in the article I posted.  And if you had bothered to read ALL of it you would know that the debunking of the NASA data was only one small piece of the evidence against anthropogenic (my how you must like that word, you use it so much) climate change theory. Other evidence that wasn’t included in my post but is in the article are:

paleoclimate scientist, Bob Carter, noted in a June 18, 2007 essay that global warming has stopped. There has been little, if any, global warming since 1979, a period over which atmospheric CO2 has increased by 17 percent. Thus, the connection between CO2 and “global warming”, the key to the claims that it is occurring and will increase has been proven wrong.

And

Dr. Roy Spencer, another critic of the global warming hoax, has noted that “At least 80 percent of the Earth’s natural greenhouse effect is due to water vapor and clouds, and those are largely under the control of precipitation systems.” The computer models used by advocates of global warming have been unable to include the actions and impact of clouds, thus rendering them seriously flawed

And

Prior to and during 2007, one research study after another revealed that the central premise of “global warming” lacks any scientific merit. One by Dr. Tim Patterson concluded that, “The earth temperature does respond to the solar cycle as confirmed by numerous studies.” The solar cycle is known to be about eleven years in length and reflects increased or decreased sunspot (magnetic storms) activity. It is the Sun that largely determines the Earth’s temperature, which is never the same throughout the planet, given seasonal and solar changes.

And

In 2007, meteorologist Anthony Watts who led a team of researchers revealed that, “The U.S. National Climate Data Center is in the middle of a scandal. Their global observing network, the heart and soul of surface weather measurement, is a disaster.” It had been discovered that many of the measuring stations were placed in locations such as on hot black asphalt, next to trash burn barrels, beside heat exhaust vents, and even attached to hot chimneys and above outdoor grills!

The whole global warming fiasco is not based on an real scientific data which makes it merely a political hoax.  Only the mentally blind would think otherwise.


You don’t have to be a moron to be a liberal Democrat but it sure helps.

docdave on September 4, 2007 at 11:04 am

DD: WHAM!  BIFF!  POW! SMASH!  I call a knockout.


If life doesn’t begin at conception, why do they call it birth control?

robert108 on September 4, 2007 at 11:10 am

Thanks, robert, but I was only posting the truth.


You don’t have to be a moron to be a liberal Democrat but it sure helps.

docdave on September 4, 2007 at 11:16 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses. Confirm your email address here.