Home Mobile Authors Say Anything Register Login

Friday, October 20, 2006

Iraq is not Vietnam

One of my favorite war historians, John Keegan has an interesting analysis published in the Torygraph. He is responding to press reports of the President admitting a comparison between ‘nam and Iraq.

It’s a great read, but this is my favorite part:

Vietnam was one of the largest and costliest wars in history. The insurgency in Iraq resembles one of the colonial disturbances of imperial history.

There is a good reason for the difference. The Vietnamese communists had organised and operated a countryside politico-military organisation with branches in almost every village. The North Vietnamese People’s Army resembled that of an organised Western state. It conscripted recruits throughout the country, trained, organised and equipped them.

The Iraqi insurgency, by contrast, is an informal undertaking by a coalition of religious and ex-Ba’athist groups. It has no high command or bureaucracy resembling the disciplined Marxist structures of North Vietnam. It has some support from like-minded groups in neighbouring countries, but nothing to compare with the North Vietnamese international network, which was supported by China and the Soviet Union and imported arms and munitions from both those countries on a large scale.

North Vietnam was, moreover, a sovereign state, supported explicitly by all other communist countries and by many sympathetic regimes in the Third World. The Iraqi insurgency has sympathisers, but they enjoy no organised system of support and are actively opposed by many of their neighbours and Muslim co-religionists.

The recent upsurge of violence in Iraq in no way resembles the Tet offensive. At Tet, the Vietnamese new year, the North Vietnamese People’s Army simultaneously attacked 40 cities and towns in South Vietnam, using 84,000 troops. Of those, the communists lost 45,000 killed. No such losses have been recorded in Iraq at any place or any time. The Tet offensive proved to be a military disaster for the Vietnamese communists. It left them scarcely able to keep up their long-running, low-level war against the South Vietnamese government and the American army.

Comments

Rob
Rob
17374 comments
Send a private message

The Tet offensive proved to be a military disaster for the Vietnamese communists

A tactical military disaster, but a propaganda win thanks to our media.


Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on October 20, 2006 at 01:34 pm

Glad to see Sir John is still smacking leftards around. I have several of his published works and several co-authored books and papers of his. Very insightful gentleman, for a civ.


Una Salus Victus Nullam Sperare Salutem

2Hotel9 on October 21, 2006 at 03:08 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses. Confirm your email address here.