Home (Post) Mobile Authors Say Anything Register Login

Wednesday, September 12, 2007

Iraq as Qaeda Bait

James Lewis

For the yapping dogs of defeat:

The Left thinks Iraq is a killing field for Americans. Actually, it is a killing field for our enemies, at a very great but vitally important sacrifice. That reflects a grand strategy, tailored to the peculiar nature of the global terror threat.

You don’t shoot poisonous fire-ants with a BB gun; you just set an ant trap. Ant colonies are highly “distributed” biological societies, much like the world-wide web. They can’t be killed with a BB or a pressure hose; even pouring flaming gasoline on an ant hill won’t work.

Instead, you destroy ant colonies by attracting hungry ants to a chemical bait, and then kill them all in one small place. Ant traps work. 

That’s the Bush strategy in Iraq. Al Qaeda isn’t centralized, with big cities or steel industries like Nazi Germany. So you can’t destroy the enemy by hunting them one by one.  Rather, you bait a trap—provoke them to come to you, and make sure they don’t get out alive.

Iraq is a trap for Al Qaeda. Our mere presence in the heart of the Osama’s Caliphate-To-Be draws them like ants to sugar. General Petraeus just reported that

“...in the past 8 months, we have considerably reduced the areas in which Al Qaeda enjoyed sanctuary. We have also neutralized 5 media cells, detained the senior Iraqi leader of Al Qaeda-Iraq, and killed or captured nearly 100 other key leaders and some 2,500 rank-and-file fighters. Al Qaeda is certainly not defeated; however, it is off balance and we are pursuing its leaders and operators aggressively.”

Most of the Qaeda fighters come from Saudi Arabia and other breeding grounds. Now that the Sunni tribes are turning against them, they are more exposed and hunted than ever before. Wars are fluid and unpredictable, but no one can imagine that Al Qaeda is happy with its victories since 9/11.

[...]

The fact is that we are drastically weakening or destroying our terror-supporting enemies: Saddam is dead, Al Qaeda is being degraded, the Taliban are hemorrhaging, and the Mullahs are surrounded.

Yet all the know-nothings think there is no strategy for Iraq.

There’s even a clever ironic twist in terms of domestic politics, because our liberals are constantly screaming Defeat! Defeat! Defeat!  That message of weakness and vulnerability inspires more and more of our enemies to come to Iraq and join in the bloody slaughter of Americans.

But when they get there, they discover they’ve been suckered. It’s not the Americans who are taking a beating, but the jihadis who fell for the headlines and who listen to the American Left. So even our malicious liberals end up encouraging the enemy to go to Iraq to die.

As President Harry Truman did, George W. Bush recognized the stakes, set in place the right strategy, and was vilified by critics as stupid. But good poker players like Harry S. Truman and George W. Bush know that you don’t show your cards too soon, just to make people think you’re smart.

Read the whole thing.

Of course, this is the real reason the lefties want us to cut and run from Iraq.

Comments

While I completely agree with the article and killing as many low-life terrorists as possible in Iraq, such a policy would likely be met with violence from the far-left.  Leftist extremists and liberal ideolouges hate all war no matter the necessity. The idea that we have a policy design to attract, isolate, and blow holes in terrorists, thier supporter, and sympathizers would ruffle thier feathers to the point of some cowardly act of violence IMO.

Rush said it well yesterday.  We have to win this war without democrats while simultaneously fighting the anti-American forces and propoganda at home.


“Like a lot of my Democratic colleagues I was too slow to appreciate the recklessness of Fannie and Freddie. I defended their efforts to encourage affordable homeownership when in retrospect I should have heeded the concerns raised by their regulator in 2004. Frankly, I wish my Democratic colleagues would admit when it comes to Fannie and Freddie, we were wrong. By the way, I wish my Republican colleagues would admit that they missed the early warning signs, that Wall Street deregulation was overheating the securities market and promoting dangerously lax lending practices. When it comes to the debacle in our capital markets, there is much blame to go around for both sides.”
-Congressman Artur Davis

HG on September 12, 2007 at 09:28 am

HG: There was unity against the terrorists for maybe two weeks after 9/11, then the MSM/Dem jihad against the President started, and has been going on ever since.  The MSM/Dems are desperate to deny any positive information about the war to the American public, but in spite of their unrelenting propaganda, the majority of the American people want to win the war against the terrorists.  It is interesting to speculate how many fewer casualties we might have had in Iraq had the Dems put aside their lust for political power and had pulled together as Americans to win.


Save America; boycott the MSM.

robert108 on September 12, 2007 at 10:33 am

r108
do you think its just the slightest bit unethical to engage in this type of a proxy battle IN IRAQ? or in any other country? the complaints related to Iraq have to do with ethics, justification, and original intentions. in claiming that we are merely engagin al Qeada over there, you give these ethical complaints weight. why the iraqi people? what have they done to get to host this proxy war? is this not a violation of the kantian maxim ‘treat people as ends in themselves and not means to an end?’


Yun Chu said, “You must strictly not express in words what is very significant. Both dragon and snake are killed in one blow.”

Sparkie Arbuckle on September 12, 2007 at 06:00 pm

do you think its just the slightest bit unethical to engage in this type of a proxy battle IN IRAQ?

No.  This is a war, not a philosophical discussion.


Save America; boycott the MSM.

robert108 on September 12, 2007 at 06:10 pm

Sparkie: The only “ethical” question in war is answered by the winner.  The world of academe only encompasses a tiny sliver of the real world, despite the inflated egos of academics like yourself.


Save America; boycott the MSM.

robert108 on September 12, 2007 at 06:12 pm

What if russia was taking out al Qaeda in the USA? How the fuck would you feel about that, not being an academic and all. BTW I assume you think people who draft constitutions, for example, are not academics? uneducated?


Yun Chu said, “You must strictly not express in words what is very significant. Both dragon and snake are killed in one blow.”

Sparkie Arbuckle on September 12, 2007 at 06:22 pm

Sparkie: Your hypothetical is ridiculous.  I should have said “ivory tower intellectuals” instead of “academics”.  Sorry I confused you.
You share the egotistical view of most ivory tower intellectuals that everyone else but them is uneducated.  In fact, it is they who are uneducated in the ways of the real world, which is why they stay in their metaphorical ivory towers.


Save America; boycott the MSM.

robert108 on September 12, 2007 at 06:28 pm

you dodged my question because your stance is shit and fighting 3rd parties in 2nd party countries is outrageously stupid. no matter, its just one last ineffective, retroactive justification for a war that will be remembered as a botched, expensive joke. why, if we are after al Qaeda, do we support the KLA, who provide $, logistics, and arms to al Qaeda? Why don’t we lock up the gunrunners who are selling them arms? It don’t add up. You don’t care though. You believe things on dogmatic justifications and think math is for academics! carry on sir!


Yun Chu said, “You must strictly not express in words what is very significant. Both dragon and snake are killed in one blow.”

Sparkie Arbuckle on September 12, 2007 at 06:34 pm

You believe things on dogmatic justifications and think math is for academics! carry on sir!

Another lie from you, Sparkie; you just make things up.
I answered your question; you just didn’t like the answer.  You tried to lay your philosophical discussion template over something in the real world: war, which has nothing whatsoever to do with ethics.  Your question is empty of meaning.


Save America; boycott the MSM.

robert108 on September 12, 2007 at 06:51 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses. Confirm your email address here.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.