Say Anything Blog

Eeeeeeeeeeeoooooooouw! Yuck! He is so disgusting on so many levels.

Mr. Flynt may find out that there are enough men in this country who abhor this kind of thing to make his little stunt incredibly counterproductive.  If I were Mr. Obama, I’d have sent a little note telling him “Stop it, and get off my side!”.

What a capitalist! Tell me a whole shitload of biblebelters wont be “rubbin’ one out” to that film. We all know who buys the porn in this country. Flynt is just meeting a demand.

Let the market do its magic, no?

Yun Chu said, “You must strictly not express in words what is very significant. Both dragon and snake are killed in one blow.”

Why is this scum bag still in business?

Depending on the circumstances, the act of intercourse can be either a defilement of the body and soul through lust and indulgence of the senses, or it can be a celebration of God-given sexuality that uplifts the bodies and spirits of both partners. Likewise, pornography could be either degrading and sinful (as it almost always is), or it could depict acts that, when viewed appropriately, could enhance the sexual and sensual relationships of believers.

Yun Chu said, “You must strictly not express in words what is very significant. Both dragon and snake are killed in one blow.”

Why is this scum bag still in business?

Larry Flint has a right to make the movie, you have the right to not watch it or buy it. If there is anything illegal about what he is doing he will be sued in civil court by those who feel he is somehow violating their rights. Palin, as a public figure has little recourse. Larry Flint has been sued countless times and has yet to lose any of those battles.
Why wouldnt he still be in business? He will make alot of money from this movie. Nieman, you dont get to pick and choose who is allowed to be in business and who isnt. He is an American with all the same rights you have. If you dont like it, dont buy it.

Mr. Flynt may find out that there are enough men in this country who abhor this kind of thing to make his little stunt incredibly counterproductive.  If I were Mr. Obama, I’d have sent a little note telling him “Stop it, and get off my side!”.

I will bet on Larry Flynt making money.

Dragon Poker and Sparkie: I don’t know which one of you are winning the idiocy race, becasue it is so close.

(A) I Never suggested your idol Larry does not have the Constitutional right to make this crap!~ Now did I?
(B) I never suggested I have the right to pick and choose who is allowed to be in business, now did I?
(C) I asked “Why is this scum bag still in business?” It was a simple question and based on the idea that I find it incredible there are so many morally bankrupt people out there, well like you two, that are willing to buy his magazine and keep him in business.
(D) Sparkless a thoroughly debauched person, only slightly removed from the lower order of animals suggested “pornography . . . could be either degrading and sinful (as it almost always is), or it could depict acts that, when viewed appropriately, could enhance the sexual and sensual relationships of believers.” Any pornography is sinful, period. It involves people viewing other people in the act of sexual intercoures and stimulates unnatural desires. Unless you can show wherein Jesus approved of pornography or can honestly envision the Holy Son of God viewing such filth, then you are wrong - it is sinful.

No matter the age or state of health, for a military man it is always glorious to tilt at windmills, rescue a fair Dulcinea and be a gallant knight in armor in a glorious cause.

Neiman: Two things; first no one “wins” the idiocy race.
Second, lefties confuse “a right” with entitlement and license.
Since the lack knowledge of the Creator, they are not able to appreciate the reality of human rights, and confuse them with impulse.

"Give the lefties a pile of money, and they’ll spend it buying votes.” - Rush Limbaugh on the “bailout”.

Hey wierd jesus freaks,
jesus loves you, but everyone else thinks your an asshole. Go fuck yourselves and have a great weekend.

Dragon Poker: That is not like you! Calm down! You are much more reasonable and rational!

No matter the age or state of health, for a military man it is always glorious to tilt at windmills, rescue a fair Dulcinea and be a gallant knight in armor in a glorious cause.

Neiman.
Thanks for advertising for Flynt. A+. He’s grateful. Its free.

Yun Chu said, “You must strictly not express in words what is very significant. Both dragon and snake are killed in one blow.”

It involves people viewing other people in the act of sexual intercoures and stimulates unnatural desires.

Actually, they are natural desires.

It involves people viewing other people in the act of sexual intercoures and stimulates unnatural desires.

Actually, they are natural desires.

Yes! In a bizzaro, liberal, sodomy promoting world; but not among normal, moral and decent people.

The fact is, there is no sense discussing why these movies are evil, as in my many discussions with you, you have such a strong, visceral, hate filled reaction to moral absolutes and the Church that it blinds you to rationally discussing the issue. However, for others here: Sexual intercourse among the lower order of animals, living beings operating in every sphere of their lives out of lust, is simply about physical satisfaction, following inbred sexual desires; but among human beings it is about, or at least should be about physical intimacy among married people (man + woman) and the sexual desire is a gift of God to stimulate reprodution of the human species, for the future and to develop strong family bonds. Among such people, despite our often failure to adhere to these higher moral standards of sexuality, sexual desires are controlled and restricted to their lifetime mate, otherwise we are no better than thoughtless, rutting (male animals in a state of sexual arousal) pigs.

No matter the age or state of health, for a military man it is always glorious to tilt at windmills, rescue a fair Dulcinea and be a gallant knight in armor in a glorious cause.

Actually, they are natural desires.
Lestat on October 4, 2008 at 09:59 am

Hey wierd jesus freaks,
jesus loves you, but everyone else thinks your an asshole. Go fuck yourselves and have a great weekend.
dragon poker on October 3, 2008 at 06:38 pm

Hey you sick bastards, you have just given us another insight into your morbid and unhealthy beliefs and have demonstrated what diseased principles you uphold…

Megan’s Law
New York State adopted a law in the 1990s that requires the state to create a registry of convicted “sex offenders,” or people convicted of various degrees of rape, sodomy, kidnapping, patronizing a prostitute or promoting prostitution, disseminating indecent material to minors, using a child in a sexual performance, promoting or possessing a sexual performance of a child. Most states have adopted similar laws.

Are you listed on that registry, Lestat? Dragon Poker?

Dragon Poker: That is not like you! Calm down! You are much more reasonable and rational!

You are absolutely right neiman. I did what I generally dont do, and that is over react in an aggressive and unintellectual way to an unworthy response.
I should have said: nieman, let the market work. If Larry Flint can make $$ without your patronage in his product, so be it. If the public wants to see a Palin look-a-like doin the nasty with 6 or 8 BBC’s then thats ok with me. Your constant biblical excuses for judging and trying to conrtol everything you dislike is tiresome and invalid for the vast majority of those who vote and live in the U.S.
Sorry for the low value of my last post to you neiman.

Are you listed on that registry, Lestat? Dragon Poker?

No, I am not. Are you? Do you really think that to believe in freedom of expression and freedom of thought constitutes a crime worthy of being “listed”? Sounds like fascism to me.
I know a bit about Larry Flint, and none of this

Megan’s Law
New York State adopted a law in the 1990s that requires the state to create a registry of convicted “sex offenders,” or people convicted of various degrees of rape, sodomy, kidnapping, patronizing a prostitute or promoting prostitution, disseminating indecent material to minors, using a child in a sexual performance, promoting or possessing a sexual performance of a child. Most states have adopted similar laws.

aplies to Larry Flint in any way. So sorry your so reactive and emotional. Try reading the bill of rights sometime, and quit pretending you understand what freedom of speech means. Also, you walk perilously close to slander. Please refrain from your roundabout accuasations, as they can be turned against you pretty easily.

Also, you walk perilously close to slander.

Let me try to get even closer...You’re a perverted asshole.

It’s people like you who enable sex offenders with your red herring argument..and it’s got nothing “nothing” to do with freedom of speech...that’s liberal bullshit…

If the public wants to see a Palin look-a-like doin the nasty with 6 or 8 BBC’s then thats ok with me.

You’re sick....find a good shrink to help you overcome your addiction. The first step would be to cancel your NAMBLA membership.

Also, here’s an interesting point. While he berates me [mistakenly] for not knowing the Bill Of Rights and for not knowing what freedom of speech means, he then tries to silence me and suppress my own freedom of speech on a blog with a feeble, punk-ass,veiled threat about “coming close to slander.”

Funny how that works.

quit pretending you understand what freedom of speech means. Also, you walk perilously close to slander. Please refrain from your roundabout accuasations, as they can be turned against you pretty easily.
Dragon Poker

Simply put, there seem to be neither boundries nor taboos anymore when it comes to sex.

Anything goes- sex has become a ubiquitous, cheap, meaningless quest for for ever-greater thrills.

And with the evolution of online pornography, every type of perverted sexual experience has literally been shoved under the noses of millions of Americans [and American children] against their will.  It’s reached epidemic proportions.

There are no bounds-no lower limits. Whatever people can imagine, even for a second in the darkest recesses of their mind, there is someone, somewhere doing it, praising it, and drawing others to it via the internet.

Strangest of all is the fact that any behavior, any belief-no matter how obviously insane- is rationalized so it sounds reasonable, even spiritual.
i.e. Dragon Poker extolling perversion in lofty terms like “freedom of expression” and “freedom of thought.”

Poker says:
If the public wants to see a Palin look-a-like doin the nasty with 6 or 8 BBC’s then thats ok with me.

Would it still be acceptable to you if the Palin look-a-like was your daughter?

Joel,
You prove you dont like prom. Thats loud and clear. I get it. You prove nothing wise except personal viewpoint. Hyperbole and personal bias doesnt change the fact of freedom of speech, nor does it show any understanding of the world you live in. Your very words show a lack of knowledge and a lack of appreciation for personal freedoms. Appently, you think personal freedom is whatever you want it to be.  You think that you know whats best for everyone, and since societies standards dont meet your expectations, you wish for the power to make it what you want it to be, regardless of what others want or what others with your same rights see as acceptable. You make accusations you have no idea about. You react emotionally and expect others to dance down the yellow brick road with you. Sorry asshole, it dont work that way, no matter how much you wish it did. Thats too bad for you.
Oh.....
Would it still be acceptable to you if the Palin look-a-like was your daughter?
If my daughter were of legal age and responsible for herself, I would have no control over what she did, nor should I. I could try to advise her not to do something like that, but in the end we all make our own desicions.I might not like it, but I recognize that adults have the right to live life as they see fit, within the bound of the LAW.  What you want is for everyone to live under the bounds of YOUR PREFERENCES. You dont get to make those for others adults idiot. Your emotional and ineffective and ignorant.

If my daughter were of legal age and responsible for herself, I would have no control over what she did, nor should I.

Non-responsive.  The question was whether or not you would find it acceptable; your leftie moral relativist bullshit is noted.

I pity any child of such a spineless parent.

"Give the lefties a pile of money, and they’ll spend it buying votes.” - Rush Limbaugh on the “bailout”.

I pity any child of such a spineless parent.

My accepting or not accepting makes no difference in someone elses life. If you daughter were to do something like this, or want to do something like this, your adult free daughter, what would you do? Certainly you would voice your displeasure, surly you would use whatever “leverage” you think you might have to stop the stiuation, but other than that, you would be powerless, unless you were willing to commit a federal crime and imprison your adult daughter against her will. Would you do that? Once again, you talk out yer ass. Thats all you seem to be able to do bobert.

More idiotic bullshit from you.  I would not find it acceptable, and my daughter would know that her whole life.  I’m not a moral relativist; I know right from wrong.  That is one of the most valuable things one can pass on to a child.
If your daughter ends up doing porn, it will be because of the way you brought her up, the values you instilled, and the friends you allowed her to hang out with.

"Give the lefties a pile of money, and they’ll spend it buying votes.” - Rush Limbaugh on the “bailout”.

bobert, you didnt answer the question.

I did answer the question; you didn’t answer it.  Would you find it acceptable for your daughter to do porn?  That was the question.  You tried to distract from your inability to answer it.  I cut through your avalanche of bullshit, as usual.

"Give the lefties a pile of money, and they’ll spend it buying votes.” - Rush Limbaugh on the “bailout”.

Dragon Poker, sorry, but you did give quite the namby-pamby response to 108’s question, and reality is that when you do so, you tell those with whom you’re dealing that it’s at least “not condemnable.”

And that’s almost precisely what Obama does--saying that if his daughters make a mistake, he doesn’t want them “punished” with a baby.  And then he wonders why so many people in his neighborhood in South Chicago have “baby daddies” instead of “husbands.”

Sorry, but one can be (and should be ) a little bit more judgmental about such things.  One can clearly express condemnation for an act without committing a federal crime, don’t ya think?  Something like letting the young one know that if that’s the career she chooses (or he for that matter), they can kiss any inheritance or college help good-bye, and have fun making your car payment on your own!

And yeah, that $3000 payment that apparently was offered will go a real long way towards the drugs needed to numb the pain of being in porn.  Think about it; financial incentives WORK.  Societal condemnation WORKS.  Let’s give it a try instead of voicing vague disapproval, K?

Sorry, but one can be (and should be ) a little bit more judgmental about such things.  One can clearly express condemnation for an act without committing a federal crime, don’t ya think? 

Yes, I do. I agree that raising a child the right way helps keep the possibility of somehting like this taking place in a family. No argument at all. What I am saying is that we only have a certain amount of control over those around us, even our offspring. They are free to do as they wish at a certain point. I could condemn the actions of my daughter, or yours. I can threaten and persuade. I can cut off contact, or I can use whatever mean I have at hand to stop what I see as inappropriate behavior. It makes no difference. In the end, that person will do what they want to do. I cannot and should not force my standards onto other adults, even if what they do hurts me personally, as long as they are acting in a legal manner and I am not personally threatened. My belief that we are all responsible for ourselves, and that each one of us must make our own lives what we will of them, includes offspring. It might hurt me personally, but only arrogance would make me think that I have the RIGHT to stop a free adult from doing what they think they need to do in thier life. I belive in personal responsibility, even when it comes to those I love. Its not my job or my right to enforce morality on other adults. Period.

Is it really not our job to enforce the morality of others?  When someone steals from us, do we hesitate to report the embezzlement or fraud to the DA, or do we hesitate to sue for that fraud & theft?  When someone damages our property, do we hesitate to ask for compensation?  If someone assaults us, or someone we love, do we hesitate to stop the assault or call the police?

Not if we value our property and safety. 

Same basic principle for 108’s situation.  You’re saying some of the same things I or 108 are saying, to be sure, but it’s couched in nonjudgemental language that really defeats your purpose.  You’re not valuing your (real or hypothetical) daughter with such Obama-esque rhetoric.

Again, I pity the child or children of such a spineless and ineffectual parent.

"Give the lefties a pile of money, and they’ll spend it buying votes.” - Rush Limbaugh on the “bailout”.