Home (Post) Mobile Authors Say Anything Register Login

Monday, April 21, 2008

‘Hormone-free’ milk spurs labeling debate

Summary of Article:

It looks as though Monsanto corporation is making attempts to prevent the labeling of milk sold to consumers which is produced without recombinant bovine growth hormones (rBGH). Monsanto produces and sells the synthetic hormone under the name Posilac, which is given to lactating cows to increase yields.

Monsanto contends that milk from cows treated with Posilac is safe and no different from milk from cows with naturally occurring hormones. They say labeling claims about hormones mislead consumers into thinking there is a difference in milk quality. Both Europe and Canada have banned the use of synthetic growth hormones, but the U.S. Food and Drug Administration gave it the ok in 1993.

Many consumers appear to favor milk without Posilac, and this year Starbucks, Kraft, and Wal-Mart rolled out rBGH-free milk products. Eric Newman, a representative at Organic Valley, a cooperative that sells milk under the Organic Valley and Stonyfield Farm labels, believes Wal-Mart’s decision to sell rBGH-free milk will be the death knell to synthetic growth hormone.

Look for strong state-level debate over labeling to continue. Pennsylvania, the 5th largest dairy state banned labeling claims in October 2007, but rescinded the ban after considerable consumer backlash.
http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/0421/p13s01-sten.html
‘Hormone-free’ milk spurs labeling debate | csmonitor.com

Comments

Avatar for waterjoe

I can never figure out if companies like Monsanto really believe that the only reason consumers might want rBGH-free milk is because they think it is less safe or if the companies are just using that argument because it works for them.

Certainly, there are other reasons why consumers may want rBGH-free milk.  They may agree with those dairy farmers who feel that it is not in the best interest of the cows.  Or they might think that rBGH, because it increases milk production, eventually lowers the cost of milk and drives small operators out of business, especially if they do not get on the band wagon to use rBGH and expand operations.

What ever their reasons, retailers should have a right to label according to the consumer’s interests.

waterjoe on April 21, 2008 at 09:16 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses. Confirm your email address here.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.