Home (Post) Mobile Authors Say Anything Register Login

Thursday, March 15, 2007

How’d the tour go George?

As US President George W Bush finishes his tour of Latin America, it seems that popular consensus in most countries south of the border is less in favour of Bush and the US than ever. Key in the shagrin felt by many is the building of the wall on the US-Mexican border to keep illegal immigrants out.

In Guatemala, Bush told reporters “It"s very important for the people of South America and Central America to know that the United States cares deeply about the human condition,” whilst in Brazil, he told a press conference “I don"t think America gets enough credit for trying to help improve people’s lives.”
However, the combination of a free reign for US corporations in the region and US subsidies and tariffs to keep out key Latin American export products is widely considered part of the reason why poverty has dramatically increased over the last two decades.

President Hugo Chavez of Venezuala took a parallel tour of South American countries, but claimed there was no intention to counter Bush’s tour with his own.

President George W. Bush promised this week to deliver “social justice” to poor and struggling Latin Americans left behind by the global economy.

Bush’s striking use of the revolutionary language of the left reflected an urgent attempt by the president to stave off the growing regional influence of populist leaders like President Hugo Chávez of Venezuela, who have used the discontent of the poor to promote an anti-American agenda.

Bush’s tour, Latin American analysts say, signified a new phase in a post-Cold War struggle for allegiance in South and Central America — regions that have fallen out of focus in Washington as Bush has pursued two wars and a wider campaign against terrorism.

(From International Herald Tribune here

Comments

He had a great time… signing hippy energy pacts and giving out free healthcare in Guatemala!


Yun Chu said, “You must strictly not express in words what is very significant. Both dragon and snake are killed in one blow.”

Sparkie Arbuckle on March 16, 2007 at 04:32 am

I really think we need freer trade.  Tariffs are just another form of subsidy. 

Subsidies are bad, M-Kay.

Seth Yantiss on March 16, 2007 at 06:18 am

I really think we need freer trade.

Break down the borders. Burn the fed!


Yun Chu said, “You must strictly not express in words what is very significant. Both dragon and snake are killed in one blow.”

Sparkie Arbuckle on March 16, 2007 at 07:05 am

It would certainly help reduce some of the animosity developing nations feel towards the West.


Do not fear to be eccentric in opinion, for every opinion now accepted was once eccentric.

ManofFireandLight on March 16, 2007 at 12:07 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses. Confirm your email address here.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.