Say Anything Blog

Oh my.

Not content with bundled contributions in a Hsu, the front running democRAT has resorted to a convicted criminal and disbarred lawyer as one of her three primary counselors on foreign affairs:

A Sandy Burglar Comeback?
Jonathan Adler, September 10, 2007 at 9:37pm

In a report on the efforts of Democratic presidential candidates to attract the “best and brightest” policy advisors for their campaigns, Newsweek columnist Michael Hirsh reports that former national security advisor and document pilferer Sandy Berger is one of the three foreign policy experts most relied upon by Senator Hillary Clinton in her White House bid. No word on whether he would have a White House position — or security clearance — in a potential Clinton Administration.

Oh my.

Someone who stole highly classified documents from the National Archives, then destroyed them (as per his own allocution) is one of three primary counselors on foreign affairs and national security to the leading Democratic candidate for the Presidency....

The mind bogles…

Jonathan Adler continues:

Why do I find the report that Hillary Clinton is using Sandy Berger as one of her key foreign policy advisors so unnerving? Because it shows both poor judgment and a lack of regard for Berger’s legal and ethical breaches. I also find it quite surprising. Hillary Clinton has impressed me as a Senator and as a candidate. Whatever her other faults, she is intelligent, savvy, disciplined, and determined; by far the most impressive candidate in the Democratic field. All this makes her apparent inclusion of Berger in her foreign policy “triumverate” all the more difficult to fathom.

For those who forget, Berger repeatedly stole and destroyed classified documents, resulting in the temporary loss of his security clearance. Berger has never provided a plausible explanation for his actions. By voluntarily giving up his law license, he avoided a cross-examination from bar counsel, so we still do not know precisely what he was doing and why. Indeed, the only assurance that Berger did not destroy unique copies of classified national security documents—such as copies of reports containing notations in the margins and the like—comes from Berger himself, something that the 9/11 Commission was not told when it was preparing its report (as I noted here).

As Glenn Reynolds points out: “Maybe she owed him a favor.”