Home (Post) Mobile Authors Say Anything Register Login

Wednesday, April 18, 2007

Good News: The Rich Are Getting Richer… And there’s a Lot More of Them, Too

A recently announced survey of affluent households by The Spectrem Group, a Chicago-based financial services market research firm, found that the number of affluent households in the US has increased dramatically in the past 10 years.  There are now record numbers of affluent Americans.

Spectrem listed several categories of such households, starting with those with a net worth of $500,000 NIPR (not including primary residence), up to those with a net worth of $5 million NIPR and above.  The number of households in each category of “affluence” reached an all-time record high in 2006.

Those of us who are fervent believers in free market capitalism understand that this dramatic rise in American affluence is directly tied to the Bush administration’s economic policies, including specifically the Bush tax cuts.  In the last 100 years, 5 US presidents’ economic policies have included cuts in tax rates, and in every instance the US economy has increased its rate of growth, creating more wealth for more people while generating more tax revenues in the process.

Those on the Left will see these survey results differently, as proof that the evil rich are getting richer, justifying their call for raising taxes.  Whether from ignorance or sheer partisan stupidity, liberals mistakenly see economic activity as a zero-sum endeavor, that is, that one individual’s success and affluence is always achieved at the expense of another.  This explains why those on the left are so cognitively oblivious when the subject at hand is economic growth and expansion.

The idea that some people can increase their own affluence without diminishing the economic status of others is simply beyond the comprehension of those on the Left, despite all the available evidence.  Zero-sum class warfare is the doctrinal opiate of the liberal masses, a creed as dear to those on the Left as the Nicene Creed is to those of the Catholic faith.

Our next president will face an array of daunting economic policy questions while in office.  What we need are policies that promote more economic growth, more success, and more affluence, not less.  We need more people getting rich, not fewer.

Comments

Your analysis is right on.  While this article shows how well the economy has been for individuals, the left fraudulently uses such info for their class war.  Bush Derangement Syndrome only increases their lack of understanding.

electnixon on April 18, 2007 at 10:33 am

Whether they admit it or not… indeed, whether they are even aware enough… the guiding principle of liberal economic policy is to penalize success rather than encourage more of it.  Rather than promoting affluence and success, liberals favor policies which erect barriers to success and punish affluence.

Yet the very same hypocrites of the Left who disparage free market economic incentives pander shamelessly to their assorted groups of special interests and victims, thus effectively creating (Gasp!) incentives for the support of their anti-incentive economic policies.

I have yet to see any liberal who can effectively defend tax increases as the basis for sound, continued economic growth.


“Poverty of goods is easily cured; poverty of the mind is irreparable.”

Bat One on April 18, 2007 at 11:30 am

The idea that some people can increase their own affluence without diminishing the economic status of others is simply beyond the comprehension of those on the Left, despite all the available evidence. 

It is the very nature of an expanding economy that there are opportunities.  When the economy contracts or is stagnant, there is significantly less class mobility.

I want a country of class mobility and opportunity, not one of class warfare and stagnation.

Justin B. on April 18, 2007 at 05:14 pm

There is no free market in the US, nor free trade. Just look at ag subsidies and tax breaks for companies (another form of subsidies). The US had to implement the highest tariffs in the world to become an economic power. Japan had superior electronic products in the 80’s and what does free market champion Reagan do? tariffs.

Graeme on April 19, 2007 at 11:56 am

The US had to implement the highest tariffs in the world

Had to? Oh. Highest in the world? Oh. Right.


Yun Chu said, “You must strictly not express in words what is very significant. Both dragon and snake are killed in one blow.”

Sparkie Arbuckle on April 19, 2007 at 12:00 pm
Rob
Rob
19516 comments
Send a private message

There is no free market in the US, nor free trade. Just look at ag subsidies

Exactly right.  That’s why free trade people like me are against subsidies.

Did you not get that, Graeme, or are you just pretending to be dumb?

and tax breaks for companies (another form of subsidies)

Letting people keep more of their own money is hardly a subsidy, dipshit.

The government doesn’t “subsidize” you by allowing you to keep the 60% or so of your income they don’t take.  That’s money you earned.  Just as the profits the companies earn are theirs.

The US had to implement the highest tariffs in the world to become an economic power.

We became an economic power despite those tariffs, which artificially inflate prices for goods/services, not because of them.

Seriously, did you flunk economics in school?


When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on April 19, 2007 at 12:25 pm

Graeme,

The thrust of your argument, such as it is, seems to be that because we have at times failed to live up to our stated principles, we ought to abandon the principles.  I don’t think you’ll find many people stupid enough to agree.


“Poverty of goods is easily cured; poverty of the mind is irreparable.”

Bat One on April 19, 2007 at 12:32 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses. Confirm your email address here.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.