Home (Post) Mobile Authors Say Anything Register Login

Friday, June 01, 2007

Global warming: The new Golden Idol*

There’s a new “controversy” brewing over NASA Administrator Michael Griffin’s comments about global warming in an interview on NRP yesterday.

NASA Chief Questions Urgency of Global Warming. I listened to this interview yesterday and again today. The exchange about global warming was only a part of the interview aired but this is the only text up on the NPR website. You can still click on the listen link to hear the whole broadcast of the interview. Here’s a part of the NPR text:

Do you have any doubt that this is a problem that mankind has to wrestle with?

I have no doubt that … a trend of global warming exists. I am not sure that it is fair to say that it is a problem we must wrestle with. To assume that it is a problem is to assume that the state of Earth’s climate today is the optimal climate, the best climate that we could have or ever have had and that we need to take steps to make sure that it doesn’t change. First of all, I don’t think it’s within the power of human beings to assure that the climate does not change, as millions of years of history have shown. And second of all, I guess I would ask which human beings — where and when — are to be accorded the privilege of deciding that this particular climate that we have right here today, right now is the best climate for all other human beings. I think that’s a rather arrogant position for people to take.

That seems like a reasonable response to me but at least one scientist is calling for him to resign because of his responses to the questions about global warming.

NASA Administrator Assailed for Climate Comments
Policymakers and scientists are strongly criticizing comments by Michael Griffin, the head of NASA, who has said he didn’t think global warming was something necessary to wrestle with. He made the comments on Thursday’s Morning Edition, saying that it’s arrogant to assume that the climate we have today is the best climate for all people.

You can just imagine people carrying on this way when scientists started theorizing that the world wasn’t flat or that the earth wasn’t the center of the solar system or that our solar system wasn’t the center of the universe. They were wildly out of step with the mainstream scientific views of their time too.

These scientist all sound scared that they might be found out for not believing in global warming, particularly the more outrageous claims such as sea levels rising by hundreds of feet (someone actually mentions this in the story above), hook, line, and sinker. They seem quite willing to throw Griffin into the firey furnace for his transgressions.

This all started with an interview with Greg Easterbrook where he criticized NASA for just about everything under the sun (pun intended).

Does NASA Still Have the Right Stuff?
NASA wants to build a new base on the Moon, but some argue it is costly and unnecessary venture. Spending taxpayer dollars on programs that are of little tangible value only hurts the agency in the long run.

Gregg Easterbrook, a contributing writer for WIRED magazine speaks to Steve Inskeep.

Somewhere in there he complained about NASA not doing enough to battle global warming which set us on the road to this current “controversy.”

*No I’m not talking about American Idol. I’m referencing the story of Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego from the Old Testament. Their colleagues were none to pleased that they wouldn’t go along to get along either.

Comments

Samantha, I’ll just point out that NPR has changed their name to “National Pacifica Radio”.  That should explain a lot about their current ultra-liberal bias.

Griffin raised some pretty tough questions for the global-warming jihadists to address.  As is typical for these anti-intellectual psuedo-scientists, their standard response when questioned is to attack and try and destroy the messenger.

Carrick on June 2, 2007 at 09:11 pm

NPR has changed their name to “National Pacifica Radio”

Is that a joke? Cause this is the only NPR I’ve ever known about.

I don’t know if I would go so far as to call them jihadists. They haven’t killed anyone yet as far as I know, a few careers maybe, but not actual people. However, their credibility takes a nose dive whenever they respond like this to anyone who doesn’t agree with them.

Samantha on June 3, 2007 at 12:42 pm

Samantha that is a joke.  Pacifica Radio is as left-leaning as it gets.  NPR still means National Public Radio, which unfortunately has gone completely and unabashedly to a far left perspective.  (I still listen to them, when I can find their broadcasts.)

“jihadists” in the sense i use it just means people fanatically devoted to a cause.  And many of them, including some of the fine people on realclimate.org have long ago left their credibility behind with their unflinching loyalty to a particular viewpoint on global warming.

Carrick on June 3, 2007 at 06:54 pm

btw I meant I still listen to Pacifica Radio when i can find their broadcasts.  They don’t pretend that they are anything other than a progressive network.

Carrick on June 3, 2007 at 06:56 pm
Proof
Proof
12801 comments
Send a private message

National Public Radio

My favorite program is “Morning Sedition”!


Barack Obama: All hat and no cattle since 1997!


Proof on June 3, 2007 at 07:03 pm

Calling them jihadists just seems too much like the behaviour we are criticizing these people for. Use the term as you wish but I prefer to save it for those who threaten to slit women’s throats for not covering up and the like.

I think listening to NPR helps one develop a well rounded view of the world but the spin can be rather obvious. Morning Sedition indeed.

Samantha on June 3, 2007 at 07:11 pm
Rob
Rob
19169 comments
Send a private message

btw I meant I still listen to Pacifica Radio when i can find their broadcasts.  They don’t pretend that they are anything other than a progressive network.

I actually think the MSM would be a lot less aggravating if reporters just announced their political inclinations and got it over with.

Bias is one thing, but bias masquerading as objective journalism is quite another.


When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on June 3, 2007 at 07:24 pm

Exactly correct, Rob.  As long as they’re intellectual honest I can deal with them, and even find their viewpoint interesting and engaging while at the same time strongly disagreeing with it.

Carrick on June 4, 2007 at 05:39 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses. Confirm your email address here.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.