Home Mobile Authors Say Anything Register Login

Monday, April 07, 2008

Former “Republican"James L Bevel Incest Case

Run one single time for one single office as a Republican, yet run 8 years later as an oddball conspiracy theorist Independent for the presidential ticket with Lyndon LaRouche, and when you molest your kids, you are a prominent Republican:

A daughter of a civil rights icon who served as a top lieutenant to Martin Luther King Jr. testified Monday that her father regularly molested her beginning when she was 6 years old.

The Rev. James L. Bevel pleaded not guilty to a charge of incest before jury selection began Monday. Prosecutors have said he had sex with a teenage daughter years ago, and told her the sex was part of religious training.

The daughter testified she grew up in a communal lifestyle in which she regularly saw her father having sex with women and she came to perceive her own molestation as normal…

Bevel, 71, was a leading figure in the civil rights movement and was with King when he was assassinated 40 years ago. He also is credited with helping to conceive and organize the Million Man March.

In the 1980s, Bevel became active in Republican Party politics and unsuccessfully ran for Congress in 1984.

Ran as an independent for the Presidency in 1992 as part of a nutjob conspiracy ticket but because he ran in 1984 as a Republican and molested someone, he was active in Republican politics.  I beat RBB to it.  Surprised that he didn’t see “Republican”, “incest”, and “molest” in some meta search that he does and already post it. 

It appears that the media works about as objectively as RBB.  If you can find a way to call someone a Republican and they commit a crime, do it.

Comments

1998 - 2008

Republican --- commit ---crime, do it.


“If a conservative is still a republican after the last 13 years, he is blind to the fact that his party of choice has failed him utterly.” – Realitybasedbob

realitybasedbob on April 8, 2008 at 06:39 am

My question to you is to what end does it make sense to focus solely on crimes committed by one political party or another?  Isn’t he goal to be to clean up government and “drain the swamp” so to speak?

How is fighting corruption a partisan issue?  The very fact that you spend so much time sniping and attacking one party for crime and not looking at all politicians indicates that you care absolutely nothing about having a fair and honest government and instead are solely concerned about having a government run by Democrats, whether they are corrupt or not.

Sound about right?

Justin B. on April 8, 2008 at 04:29 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses. Confirm your email address here.