Home (Post) Mobile Authors Say Anything Register Login

Sunday, June 10, 2007

Forget Women’s Lib, Let’s All Just Convert to Islam

In the course of Googling what is going on now with the immigration debate, I came across this article in the American Thinker.  It has nothing to do with immigration, but deals with something that the Gray Lady and the rest of our MSM and entertainment media seem to be fairly silent on.

James M. Arlandson, however, did write about, [t]he truth about Muslim-Christian marriages: Some Friendly Advice to Christians.

Having witnessed a trend among European women to gravitate towards Arab men, and American Blacks to gravitate to Islam, I had often wondered what the draw was.

Evidently, this self-proclaimed Religion of Peace has in its provisions a total abrogation of any concept of Women’s Lib and many advantages for menfolk:

Men can marry up to four women (and additional slave girls don’t count) ; divorce is as easy as pointing at your recalcitrant female, (or just overweight and lesser-attractive) and saying I divorce you three times.  There is no Western-style messy child support, child custody or alimony concern, as the woman is simply out in the cold.  I guess this has been the rule from the time Mohammed walked the Earth, right up to the present.

It gets even better, beatings by husbands are freely allowed, but there is no provision for a woman’s use of force in self-defense.  Her testimony is worth only half that of a man, due to the Islamic belief that women suffer from a mental incapacity, and she is only entitled to half the inheritance of her similarly-situated male counterparts.

Rape victims are often stoned to death for their troubles, a strung-out affair, lasting sometimes half an hour.

Even those women who have not run afoul of Islamic law, particularly in Islamic Africa, must undergo infibulation in order to be considered marriageable.

Have I been missing something?  Or has Hollywood not lectured us lately, through the medium of hit movie films, of what life for women is like under Islam?

Have I missed the extensive news reporting about this, or have I just been distracted by the endless reporting of the still-dead Anna Nicole Smith, the missing Natalie Holoway, the tearful incarcerated Paris Hilton and the crotch-flashing party girls Lindsey and Britney?

Top ten rules in the Quran that oppress and insult women

On or around April 7, 2007… Du’a Khalil Aswad, a 17 year old Kurdish girl was murdered by public stoning after running away from home for a so-called honour crime. Du’a was a member of Iraq’s Yezidi religious minority from the village of Bahzan in northern Iraq. She was killed by a group of men and in the presence of a large noisy crowd in the town of Bashika, near the city of Mosul. Some of her relatives may have participated in her stoning.

Amnesty International reported that Du’a Khalil Aswad’s murder is said to have been committed by relatives and other Yezidi men because she had engaged in a relationship with a Sunni Muslim boy and had been absent from her home for one night. Some reports suggested that she had converted to Islam, but others deny this. Initially, she was reportedly given shelter in the house of a Yezidi tribal leader in Bashika, but her killers stormed the house, took her outside and stoned her to death. Her death by stoning, lasted for some 30 minutes.

Stoning to Death in Iran [WARNING: Graphic]

Laws Against Women in Pakistan

14-year old girl sentenced to death by stoning

Two Iranian women facing death by stoning and execution

Personally, I can understand somewhat the exhortations of Saint Bernard, in assisting the founding of the Knights Templar, when he wrote the following:

The knight of Christ, I say, kills with tranquil conscience and dies even more tranquilly. In dying he benefits himself, in killing he benefits Christ. For he bears not a sword without cause; he is the minister of God for the punishment of evil and the exaltation of good. When he kills a malefactor, it is not homicide but, so to say, “malecide”; and he is clearly considered the avenger of Christ in the case of those who do evil, and the defender of Christians.

-- Saint Bernard of Clairvaux, De laude novae militiae, in Migne, (1128-1131)
Patrologia Latina, vol. 182, col. 924.

Comments

Excellent critique Zigs.... “infibulation”..ouch!

Joel on June 11, 2007 at 03:40 am

Having witnessed a trend among European women to gravitate towards Arab men, and American Blacks to gravitate to Islam, I had often wondered what the draw was.
Zigs

“Know thy self, know thy enemy. A thousand battles, a thousand victories.” -Sun Tzu

Joel on June 11, 2007 at 03:49 am

YIKES! I guess if you are into that kind of thing??? BUT for the life of me I will never uderstand the appeal...No thank you!

Zsa Zsa on June 11, 2007 at 03:58 am

Zigs, very few people are examining why inner city blacks increasingly gravitate toward Islam.

Terrorism experts and some columnists have been warning of the “Islamic threat” in the American underclass, and alerting the public that the ghetto and the prison system could very well provide a fifth column for Osama bin Laden and his ilk.

Saudi money has been funneled into the American Muslim Foundation, which supports prison programs,
reiterating that America’s “alienated,” disenfranchised people [blacks] are prime targets for radical Islamists who preach a religion of violence, of overcoming oppression by jihad.

Joel on June 11, 2007 at 04:15 am

and the prison system could very well provide a fifth column for Osama bin Laden and his ilk.

NEW YORK — Inmates at the federal prison camp in Otisville, N.Y., were stunned by what they saw at the chapel library on Memorial Day — hundreds of books had disappeared from the shelves.

The removal of the books is occurring nationwide, part of a long-delayed, post-Sept. 11 federal directive intended to prevent radical religious texts, specifically Islamic ones, from falling into the hands of violent inmates.

It’s about damned time!

Joel on June 11, 2007 at 05:23 am

Thanks Joel,

Certainly ‘know your enemy’ and our media, who are supposed to take pride in keeping the public informed, have only given us a white-washed version of what the Middle East is all about, such as having Omar Sharif depicting in a dignified manner an Arab hetman with all the identifying marks and features of what would really happen nicely excised from the film Hildago; Sean Connery’s low rumbling brougue as a bedouin chieftian in The Wind and the Lion; dating back to the days of silent screen’s Valentino in The Sheik.

Why those articles came as a shock to me is because the beastiality of that so-called culture, religion, what-have-you, has been handled with kidd gloves in school history books, the press and the media.  How was I, or anyone else for that matter, to know better?

The news plays hands-off in acknowledging that the the Middle East has, as Trey Parker put in in Team America .. declared jihad on yer a$$. By that, meaning on us.

The news and media establishment are, at the very least, doing the West a massive disserve in failing to let us know what the stakes are in this kind of war.  Our fight has been made all the more difficult to wage when their drumbeat is that there IS no war, and that by simply pulling the troops back, we will be at peace.

You know and I know that we are better served in only playing away games, and that 9/11 has already happened on our soil.  Better yet, that since we have kept the enemy off-balance by being in their front yard and collecting heads from the playing deck of Saddam’s regime, the bad guys have not had a successful follow-up to 9/11.

Perhaps we could cure our ills with the MoveOn.org types, all in one fell swoop, by shipping them off to the Middle East sans U.S. military protection.

Let the Leftist males be welcomed the way the Muslim has historically welcomed the unarmed infidel* , and let the Leftist females feel the backhands of their Arab masters, and perhaps the slice needed to turn them into marriageable wives.

Ya think we might win over some converts?

Thomas Jefferson and John Adams, then serving as American ambassadors to France and Britain, respectively, met in 1786 in London with the Tripolitan Ambassador to Britain, Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja. These future American presidents were attempting to negotiate a peace treaty which would spare the United States the ravages of jihad piracy—murder, enslavement (with ransoming for redemption), and expropriation of valuable commercial assets—emanating from the Barbary states (modern Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, and Libya, known collectively in Arabic as the Maghrib). During their discussions, they questioned Ambassador Adja as to the source of the unprovoked animus directed at the nascent United States republic. Jefferson and Adams, in their subsequent report to the Continental Congress, recorded the Tripolitan Ambassador’s justification:

… *that it was founded on the Laws of their Prophet, that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as Prisoners, and that every Musselman who should be slain in Battle was sure to go to Paradise.


...for great justice

Move_Zig on June 11, 2007 at 07:43 am

I wouldn’t be suprised if the Supreme court and the Harry Reids of the world would make sure those prisoners were supplied with all the violent Islamic literature possible.

Zsa Zsa on June 11, 2007 at 08:07 am

Zigs

What the hell are you trying to do ? Use"the truth” and historical facts to try to persuade or convince these leftists morons?

To them, chicken-hearted milquetoast one and all, there is no truth [and no historical fact], only perceptions and “feelings.”
Ah..such a wicked web they weave....

Joel on June 11, 2007 at 08:33 am

Good post, Zig....

The silence of NOW and other lib organizations about the absolutely abhorrent lives women live under Islam is amazing to me.

Beating, mutilation, horrible deaths by stoning, are all ignored by our kinder and gentler liberal friends. Mind you, these are the same people who scream that Wal-Mart doesn’t pay enough and that women don’t get equal pay, etc…

makes you wonder, doesn’t it/


The future ain’t what it used to be.....

Pilgrim on June 11, 2007 at 09:10 am

To augment Zigs historical tangent, I give you:

Alexis de Tocqueville On Islam-April 16, 1849

* I studied the Quran a great deal. I came away from that study with the conviction that by and large there have been few religions in the world as deadly to men as that of Muhammad. As far as I can see, it is the principal cause of the decadence so visible today in the Muslim world and, though less absurd
than the polytheism of old, its social and political tendencies are in my opinion more to be feared, and I therefore regard it as a form of decadence rather than a form of progress in relation to paganism itself.

* Mahommed professed to derive from Heaven, and he has inserted in the Koran, not only a body of religious doctrines, but political maxims, civil and criminal laws, and theories of science. The gospel, on the contrary, only speaks of the general relations of men to God and to each other - beyond which it inculcates and imposes no point of faith. This alone, besides a thousand other reasons, would suffice to prove that the former of these religions will never long predominate in a cultivated and democratic age, whilst the latter is destined to retain its sway at these as at all other periods.

Joel on June 11, 2007 at 09:28 am

I am taking a wild guess and say Mohammad was not terribly fond of women. HA! What a man. Whip me! Beat me! I’m trash! Ahhhh! ...

Zsa Zsa on June 11, 2007 at 09:39 am

Thanks Pilg,

ZZ—I dunno, Mohammed maybe hated females, judging by the malevolent Dear Abby advice he gave to others, which later became the basis of their religion, but he had no qualms about taking a 6 year-old-girl as a wife, and then consummating it when she reached the ripe old age of 9.

There was a recent news-item which seems straight out of News of the Weird: Islamic women are not supposed to mix in public with unrelated men.  The new, Western-style workplace creates a challenge in this regard, so they posed the question to the Islamic courts for a work-around and they came up with this as a solution --- that breast-feeding indicates a familial tie, so therefore, if a woman breast-feeds her male co-workers they take on the semblance of familial ties and would therefore be permitted under Sharia law.

Dang—we are soooo far behind the Arabs when it comes to pesky workplace seckshul harrassment laws…


...for great justice

Move_Zig on June 11, 2007 at 04:30 pm

MZ...That explains alot about Mohhamad. What a creep! AND Yep, Those Arabs have cracked the sexual harrassment problems in the work place. BUT they may not have that problem too much anyway??? It sounds like they may not be too attracted to anyone other than children…

Zsa Zsa on June 12, 2007 at 02:33 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses. Confirm your email address here.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.