Home (Post) Mobile Authors Say Anything Register Login

Thursday, April 17, 2008

Ex-marshal: Air marshal training ‘a national disgrace’

SAN DIEGO, California (CNN)—Their mission is to protect airline passengers from acts of terror on U.S. flights. But in a special investigation, former and current air marshals told CNN that the number of marshals assigned to police flights is so low that the federal agency overseeing them has drastically lowered its firearms and psychological testing standards just so it can qualify new hires.

More than a dozen current and former marshals said that so many federal air marshals have resigned and are not being replaced, airport screeners are being employed to fill the dwindling ranks.

But the Transportation Security Administration says that’s not true and that the rate of those leaving has remained at 6.5 percent a year since 2001.

A former federal air marshal and weapons trainer who left the agency in 2006 after four years of service said the situation was so bad that managers at his office fudged the numbers by assigning marshals to short, no-risk flights.

The former marshal said that was done to make it appear that the percentage of manned flights was higher than it really was.

Comments

The federal government is messing it all up, huh?

And you and your party wish to give these same people control of our health care.

Do you think much?

(Don’t answer. It was rhetorical.)

likwidshoe on April 18, 2008 at 02:17 am

Well said, Lik.  However, I am always reluctant to accept the testimony of anonymous witnesses, and that’s what this consists of.

You would think that men willing to face down multiple armed criminals with a carry pistol would be willing to provide their name with allegations and stand before Congress in doing so.  Evidently not, however.  How sad.

Bike Bubba on April 18, 2008 at 07:45 am

Professional blow back perhaps?

The current administration is famous for firing people who blow whistles.


Excuse me, you were saying?


realitybasedbob's signature
realitybasedbob on April 18, 2008 at 08:11 am

Exactly who has been fired for this?  Come in, RCB, it’s at the very least counter-intuitive that a President that would keep people like Tenet and Mineta from the Clinton administration would be vindictive like this.  Provide some examples, or admit that you’re wrong.

Bike Bubba on April 18, 2008 at 09:19 am

Richard S. Foster (Medicare actuary) testified as such
Bunnatine Greenhouse
Generals have be force into early retirement
There were 8 USA’s fired for not towing the line
Sara Taylor is being investigated for inappropriate firing
Dr. Jonathan Fishbein
Sibel Edmonds

Really, it’s everywhere if you want to see it.


Excuse me, you were saying?


realitybasedbob's signature
realitybasedbob on April 18, 2008 at 09:45 am

Um, looking things up, a number of those you cite do not appear to actually be whistleblowers fired for that cause.

Nice try.  Even if whistleblowers are routinely fired, however, the bios of these people do not indicate that they’re having trouble gaining employment. 

Anonymity should be reserved for cases where grievous bodily harm or death to the individual or family members/friends is likely, not just firing or shunning.  If that’s not the case, and anonymity is still granted by the press, the reporter is suggesting that his source does not have the courage of his convictions.

Bike Bubba on April 18, 2008 at 10:01 am

Here’s are two points: The job excludes almost all retired police oficers because of the mandatory federal age limit.

Point one: If YOU have a business and refuse to hire someone because of their age YOU can face legal action. Not the federal government.

Point two: Many retired police officers are still actve and very, very experienced, with proven judgement and courage.

I dunno, (and I certainly don’t want the job because when I retire I want to sit on the back porch nekkid smokin’ dope) but it seems to me that the feds are missing out on the best possible pool of candidates for air security.


The future ain’t what it used to be.....

Pilgrim on April 18, 2008 at 07:32 pm

Good point, Pilgrim; to add one thing, I would guess that older officers would have more of a very priceless commodity called “patience” that would be needed for a job where nothing happens (thank God) 99.9% of the time.

Bike Bubba on April 21, 2008 at 07:34 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses. Confirm your email address here.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.