Home (Post) Mobile Authors Say Anything Register Login

Saturday, June 28, 2008

Evolutionary Economics

A short while ago I had the pleasure of attending a lecture titled “The Evolution of Irrationality, Insights from Non-Human Primates” by Dr. Santos from the Comparative Cognition Lab at Yale. She discussed three different studies that she has been working on including this one. Here’s the abstract:

Behavioral economics has demonstrated systematic decision-making biases in both lab and field data. Do these biases extend across contexts, cultures, or even species?
We investigate this question by introducing fiat currency and trade to a colony of capuchin monkeys, and recovering their preferences over a range of goods and gambles. We show that capuchins react rationally to both price and wealth shocks, but display several hallmark biases when faced with gambles, including reference-dependence and
loss-aversion. Given our capuchins’ inexperience with trade and gambles, these results suggest that loss-aversion extends beyond humans, and may be innate rather than learned.

They taught Capuchins to trade, then they compared the risk-taking tendencies of humans to those of the Capuchins and found that, low and behold, they display the same asymmetrical biases we do. Amazing. The implications are that we, as a species, acquired that bias at some point in our evolutionary history roughly 35 million years ago. Soon denying evolution is going to have some serious economic disadvantages. I recommend y’all get in at the ground floor. This is cool stuff. You should have seen the footage of these guys making buys. They trained them will little wallets full of mock currency. Again, amazing. Also, notice that one of the authors of this paper is from the School of Management. Cool stuff.

Comments

This gibberish only shows that you lefties are on the same level on economics as are monkeys.  What a waste of time and money!


Media uncovers more Palin stories in one weekend than Obama stories in two years. Still no bias detected

Obama: more experienced than Bristol Palin

robert108 on June 28, 2008 at 10:55 am

So… how many chimps would it take, banging away at their keyboards 24 hours a day, seven day a week, before one of them managed to write out the complete text of Milton and Rose Friedman’s ”Free To Choose”?

Probably a lot less time than it would take some other chimp to do a NYT OpEd panning the book as neanderthal, neo-con nonsense.

Whoops!  My bad!  Paul Krugman already writes for the NYT.


“Poverty of goods is easily cured; poverty of the mind is irreparable.”

Bat One on June 28, 2008 at 11:18 am

r108
Did you read the linked PDF?
No?
Then STFU.


rasberry

Sparkie Arbuckle on June 28, 2008 at 02:17 pm

Also, I wouldn’t be presumptive about the political commitments of these researchers. It’s unknown to you and the article displays no partisan biases.


rasberry

Sparkie Arbuckle on June 28, 2008 at 02:18 pm

Did you read the linked PDF?
No?
Then STFU.

I’m under no obligation to follow any of your bullshit links; I commented on your ridiculous attempt to make an equivalence between human and animal behavior, especially in the area of economics.


Media uncovers more Palin stories in one weekend than Obama stories in two years. Still no bias detected

Obama: more experienced than Bristol Palin

robert108 on June 28, 2008 at 02:26 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses. Confirm your email address here.