Home (Post) Mobile Authors Say Anything Register Login

Thursday, May 15, 2008

Democrats veto Iraq spending

BBC

Those pesky varmints have been at it again with the Democrat controlled House of Representatives voting to reject further military funding for the two fronts - in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The bill would have provided the Pentagon with $162.5bn to keep the two wars going but included add-ons wanted by the Democrats.

Republicans withheld their votes in protest, allowing the war funding bill to be defeated by 149-141…

...The House did pass two components of the bill that call for extended education benefits for returning soldiers and for President George W Bush to begin withdrawing troops from Iraq within 30 days of the bill becoming law.

The Senate will be debating the bill shortly.

If we consider that Bush will veto any bills which are set to hamper US efforts in Iraq or Afghanistan, this can simply be seen as shameless politicking with the lives of US service personnel.

Attempts to withdraw funding for this military action are ignorant of the fact that we have a moral obligation to see this through until Iraq and Afghanistan are stable, secure and able to stand alone. Cutting and running will create such a power vacuum that the region could be plunged into an even worse situation that it is in now and would inevitably alienate yet more people, making the world an even more dangerous place for Westerners.

Comments

Republicans killed the troop funding bill .
Republicans could have easily passed the bill, instead 132 voted “present”.

WOOF on May 15, 2008 at 06:09 pm

I’d agree with you WOOF if you’re willing to pay my share of the bill that your buddies in congress added that wasn’t intended to pay for overseas operations. The 132 you’re referring to aren’t so blind they can’t see, however, you appear to be.


"we should select our leaders on principle first, electability second.”

A young man whose wisdom far exceeds his years

Spartacus on May 15, 2008 at 06:22 pm

John Culberson (R-TX):  ...it contains provisions that have nothing to do with our troop’s survival and safety in the field.  To burden our troops with pork, with tax increases, with special provisions that have nothing to do with the war, adds to, I think, the obvious misuse of the process and I urge members to vote against the pork and support our troops.

Obey:  I yield myself 30 seconds...I’d like the gentleman from Texas to point out a single piece of member pork in this bill.

Culberson:  Does the gentleman yield?

Obey:  Yes.

Culberson:  Mr., Mr. Chairman, there’s a number of un-un-unnecessary provisions in this…

Obey:  Name one.

WOOF on May 15, 2008 at 06:36 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses. Confirm your email address here.